1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Chinese compound word production in typing-to-dictation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Chinese morphemes typically correspond to one character and one syllable. This one-to-one alignment makes Chinese a critical contrast to languages with more complex morpho-phonological structures for investigating the universality of morpheme activation in compound production. This study measures interkeystroke intervals (IKIs), the latencies between consecutive keystrokes, in Pinyin typing (Romanization input method), to clarify the timing of compound production. Gallant et al. (2026) found longer IKIs at character boundaries when participants typed Pinyin to transcribe visually presented two-character Chinese words. The present study used the same stimuli in the auditory modality, ensuring that characters were neither seen nor produced. We replicated the character-boundary IKI lengthening and the interaction between initial-character frequency and morphological type, demonstrating that the effects in Gallant et al. (2026) cannot be attributed solely to visual segmentation cues and providing converging evidence that characters function as cross-modal planning units in Pinyin typing. Crucially, we report a new pattern in which IKIs at character boundaries are shorter in compounds than in monomorphemic words, suggesting that morpheme activation can modulate motor execution even in a language where morphemes and syllables overlap closely. These findings further support Pinyin typing as a sensitive paradigm for investigating Chinese compound production.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25019.li
2026-08-27
2026-09-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.25019.li
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J.
    (2019) Constituent frequency effects in the written production of Spanish compound words. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/s13421‑019‑00933‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00933-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alzahrani, A.
    (2025) The acceptability and validity of AI-generated psycholinguistic stimuli. Heliyon, (), e42083. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42083
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42083 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, H., Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R.
    (2010) Frequency effects in compound processing. InS. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.311.20baa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.20baa [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, H., & Schreuder, R.
    (1999) War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1006/brln.1999.2069
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2069 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R.
    (2000) Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2681 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertram, R., Tønnessen, F. E., Strömqvist, S., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P.
    (2015) Cascaded processing in written compound word production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 207 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00207. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00207
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00207 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2005) Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (), –. 10.1073/pnas.0508431102
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508431102 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2025) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4.46, retrieved20 October 2025fromhttps://praat.org.
  10. Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B.
    (2007) Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology, (), –. 10.1007/s11525‑008‑9119‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9119-0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, J.-Y., & Chen, T.-M.
    (2007) Form encoding in Chinese word production does not involve morphemes. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960701190249
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701190249 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, T.-M., & Chen, J.-Y.
    (2006) Morphological encoding in the production of compound words in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui, L., Drieghe, D., Yan, G., Bai, X., Chi, H., & Liversedge, S. P.
    (2013) Parafoveal processing across different lexical constituents in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2012.720265
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.720265 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cui, L., Häikiö, T., Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., & Hyönä, J.
    (2017) Reading monomorphemic and compound words in Chinese. Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.12.1.01cui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.12.1.01cui [Google Scholar]
  15. Cui, L., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Cong, F., Zhang, W., & Hyönä, J.
    (2021) Compound word frequency modifies the effect of character frequency in reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/1747021820973661
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820973661 [Google Scholar]
  16. DeFrancis, J.
    (1984) The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824840303
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824840303 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dressler, W. U.
    (2006) Compound types. InG. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Duanmu, S.
    (2007) The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
    (2014) Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound processing. Lingue e Linguaggio, , –. CitetononCRdoi:10.1418/78409
     https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.1418/78409 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2016) Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/xlm0000258
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000258 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallant, J., Chen, Y., & Li, S.
    (2026) Understanding the processing of Chinese compounds: Insights from Pinyin typing. InH. Winskel & H. K. Pae (Eds.), Handbook of nonlinear writing systems (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑032‑01973‑8_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01973-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gallant, J., & Libben, G.
    (2019) No lab, no problem: Designing lexical comprehension and production experiments using PsychoPy3. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.00002.gal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00002.gal [Google Scholar]
  23. Gallant, J., Feldman, L. B., & Libben, G.
    (under review). Constituent family effects in typed compound word production.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hsieh, C.-Y., Marelli, M., & Rastle, K.
    (2024) Beyond quantity of experience: Exploring the role of semantic consistency in Chinese character knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/xlm0001294
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001294 [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang, H.-W., Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-L., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L.
    (2006) Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words. NeuroReport, (), –. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000224761.77206.1d
     https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000224761.77206.1d [Google Scholar]
  26. Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A.
    (2008) A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960802250900
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802250900 [Google Scholar]
  27. Janssen, N., Pajtas, P. E., & Caramazza, A.
    (2014) Task influences on the production and comprehension of compound words. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/s13421‑014‑0396‑z
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0396-z [Google Scholar]
  28. Jarema, G.
    (2006) Compound representation and processing: A cross-language perspective. InG. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kandel, S.
    (2023) Written production: The APOMI model of word writing: Anticipatory processing of orthographic and motor information. InR. J. Hartsuiker & K. Strijkers (Eds.), Language production (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003145790‑9
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003145790-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Grosjacques, G., & Fayol, M.
    (2011) For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: Testing the syllable-bigram controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/a0023094
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023094 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2009) Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/a0013484
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013484 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lenth, R. V.
    (2025) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (R package version 1.11.2–8). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans10.32614/CRAN.package.emmeans
     https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.emmeans [Google Scholar]
  34. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, M.-F., Lin, W.-C., Chou, T.-L., Yang, F.-L., & Wu, J.-T.
    (2015) The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9340‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Q.-L., Bi, H.-Y., Wei, T.-Q., & Chen, B.-G.
    (2011) Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica, (), –. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Diao, J., Cheng, Q., Gao, R., & Mo, L.
    (2023) Study of the orthographic neighborhood frequency effect on Chinese compound characters. Reading and Writing, (), –. 10.1007/s11145‑022‑10392‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10392-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Libben, G., & Jarema, G.
    (2004) Conceptions and questions concerning morphological processing. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Libben, G., & Weber, S.
    (2014) Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. InF. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. C. Luschützky, & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Morphology and meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012 (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.327.14lib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.14lib [Google Scholar]
  40. Lorenz, A., & Zwitserlood, P.
    (2016) Semantically transparent and opaque compounds in German noun-phrase production: Evidence for morphemes in speaking. Frontiers in Psychology, 1943 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01943. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01943
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01943 [Google Scholar]
  41. Milne, A. E., Bianco, R., Poole, K. C., Zhao, S., Oxenham, A. J., Billig, A. J., & Chait, M.
    (2021) An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑020‑01514‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
    Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2013) 通用规范汉字表 [List of Commonly Used Standard Chinese Characters]. www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/ziliao/A19/201306/t20130601_186002.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2004) Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared with Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.30.6.1271
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1271 [Google Scholar]
  44. Moskovitz, C., Hall, S., & Pemberton, M.
    (2023) Common misconceptions about text recycling in scientific writing. BioScience, (), –. 10.1093/biosci/biac090
     https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac090 [Google Scholar]
  45. Myers, J.
    (2010) Chinese as a natural experiment. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye [Google Scholar]
  46. Nozari, N., Pinet, S., & Muylle, M.
    (2026) What can typing tell us about language production?Annual Review of Linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑041824‑034740
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-041824-034740 [Google Scholar]
  47. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K.
    (2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑01193‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y [Google Scholar]
  48. Pinet, S.
    (2025) The missing link between response selection and execution in language production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, , . 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101246
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101246 [Google Scholar]
  49. Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F.
    (2019) Orthographic effects in Mandarin spoken language production. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/s13421‑018‑0868‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0868-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S.
    (2014) Representation of orthographic knowledge. InM. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.026
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.026 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
    (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960802069730
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03196742
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  54. Roelofs, A.
    (1996) Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1996.0044
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0044 [Google Scholar]
  55. Scaltritti, M., Arfé, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F.
    (2016) Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (1997) How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sun, C. C., Hendrix, P., Ma, J., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2018) Chinese lexical database (CLD). Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1038‑3
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1038-3 [Google Scholar]
  58. Taft, M., & Zhu, X.
    (1995) The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. InL. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Taikh, A., Gagné, C., & Spalding, T.
    (2023) Accessing the semantic and lexical information of constituents while typing compounds. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.21005.tai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21005.tai [Google Scholar]
  60. Tse, C.-S., Chan, Y.-L., Yap, M. J., & Tsang, H. C.
    (2023) The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑022‑02022‑z
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02022-z [Google Scholar]
  61. Tse, C.-S., Yap, M. J., & Chan, Y.-L.
    (2024) Neighborhood in Chinese lexicon: A megastudy analysis of lexical decision and naming of two-character Chinese words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/xlm0001357
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001357 [Google Scholar]
  62. van Galen, G. P.
    (1991) Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, (), –. 10.1016/0167‑9457(91)90003‑G
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang, J., Schiller, N. O., & Verdonschot, R. G.
    (2024) Word and morpheme frequency effects in naming Mandarin Chinese compounds: More than a replication. Brain and Language, , . 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105496
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105496 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang, M., Shao, Z., Verdonschot, R. G., Chen, Y., & Schiller, N. O.
    (2023) Orthography influences spoken word production in blocked cyclic naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑022‑02123‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02123-y [Google Scholar]
  65. Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U.
    (2004) Morphemes, syllables and graphemes in written word production. InT. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110894028.529
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894028.529 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., … Yutani, H.
    (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.01686
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 [Google Scholar]
  67. Will, U., Nottbusch, G., & Weingarten, R.
    (2006) Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay. Written Language & Literacy, (), –. 10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil [Google Scholar]
  68. Xiao, R., McEnery, T., & Rayson, P.
    (2009) A frequency dictionary of Mandarin Chinese: Core vocabulary for learners. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203883075
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883075 [Google Scholar]
  69. Xing, J. Z.
    (2006) Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: A pedagogical grammar. Hong Kong University Press. 10.5790/hongkong/9789622097629.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622097629.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  70. Yousefzadeh, B., Libben, G., & Segalowitz, S. J.
    (2024) Persian compounds in the mental lexicon. Frontiers in Communication, , 1293401. 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1293401
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1293401 [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, Q., Wu, J., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X.
    (2026) What roles do constituents play in the identification of Chinese compound words? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2026.104743
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2026.104743 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (1994) Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690969408402125
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402125 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zwitserlood, P.
    (1994) The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690969408402123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402123 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25019.li
Loading
Chinese compound word production in typing-to-dictation
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.25019.li
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25019.li
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25019.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: compound processing ; typed production ; Chinese compounds ; Chinese writing system ; Pinyin typing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error