1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. The Mental Lexicon
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Effects of vocabulary size on the perception of L2 phonological categories
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

For decades, bilingualism has been a topic of interest in speech perception research. Published studies aim to explain whether and how one can acquire phonological categories from an additional language that are not present in the first one. There is also an ongoing hypothesis that the size of second-language vocabulary contributes to the effective acquisition of L2 phonological categories. However, few studies have investigated this issue in foreign language learning (i.e., when a language is learned in a context where it is not widely spoken in the surrounding community). This is what the present study aims to investigate. An experiment consisting of an auditory AX categorization task and a vocabulary size test was conducted with 27 Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The results indicate a potential association between a more extensive second-language vocabulary and the ability to contrast L1 and L2 sounds more effectively.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
2026-07-31
2026-08-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balas, A.
    (2018) English vowel perception by Polish advanced learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, (), –. 10.1017/cnj.2018.5
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2018.5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Best, Catherine
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. Inbook: Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues (pp.171–204)Publisher: Timonium: New York Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Best, C., & Tyler, M.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    (2025) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4.46, retrieved20 October 2025fromhttps://praat.org
  6. Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke & Best, Catherine & Tyler, Michael
    (2011) Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716410000287
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000287 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., Kroos, C., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2012) Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716411000518
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000518 [Google Scholar]
  8. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2020) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available atwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
  9. Cochrane, R. M.
    (1980) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese children and adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.1980.9994031
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1980.9994031 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dai, H., Versfeld, N. J., & Green, D. M.
    (1996) The optimum decision rules in the same-different paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, (), –. 10.3758/BF03205469
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205469 [Google Scholar]
  11. Escudero, P., Boersma, P., Rauber, A. S., Bion, R. A. H.
    (2009) A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.3180321
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321 [Google Scholar]
  12. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, –. Timonium, MD: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (2003) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. InN. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, –. Berlin; New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN3-11-089509-9. 10.1515/9783110895094.319
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895094.319 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L.
    (2008) Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.) [hardcover]. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN978-0-8058-5497-8. 10.4324/9780203932841
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932841 [Google Scholar]
  15. Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N. V., & Tenizi, M.
    (2020) Vocabulary Size Leads to Better Attunement to L2 Phonetic Differences: Clues from Russian Learners of English. Language Learning and Development, (), –. 10.1080/15475441.2020.1814779
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1814779 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hautus, M. J.
    Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, – (1995) 10.3758/BF03203619
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203619 [Google Scholar]
  17. John Fox
    John Fox (2003) Effect Displays in R for Generalized Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v008.i15
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i15 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kingston, J., & Macmillan, N. A.
    (1995) Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.412169
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412169 [Google Scholar]
  19. Knoblauch, K.
    (2023) psyphy: Functions for Analyzing Psychophysical. Data in R. 〈10.32614/CRAN.package.psyphy〉, R package version 0.3, 〈https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psyphy〉.
     https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.psyphy [Google Scholar]
  20. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
    (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0146‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Llompart, M.
    (2021) Phonetic categorization ability and vocabulary size contribute to the encoding of difficult second-language phonological contrasts into the lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728920000656
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000656 [Google Scholar]
  22. Macmillan, N. A.
    (2002) Signal detection theory. In: Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. 3rd ed.Hal Pashler, editor-in-chief. Volume 4: Methodology in experimental psychology, p.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., & Creelman, C. D.
    (1977) The psychophysics of categorical perception. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.5.452
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.452 [Google Scholar]
  24. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D.
    (1990) Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and “nonparametric” indexes. Psychological bulletin, (), . 10.1037/0033‑2909.107.3.401
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.401 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rauber, Andreia & Escudero, Paola & Bion, Ricardo & Baptista, Barbara
    (2005) The interrelation between the perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of Interspeech, –. 10.21437/Interspeech.2005‑769
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-769 [Google Scholar]
  26. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Schouten, M. E. H., & Van Hessen, A. J.
    (1992) Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.403841
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.403841 [Google Scholar]
  28. Song, J. Y., & Eckman, F.
    (2024) The relationship between L2 learners’ production and perception of English vowels: The role of native-speaker acoustic patterns in production. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/02676583241240868 (Original work published 2025)
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583241240868 [Google Scholar]
  29. Souza, H. K.
    (2017) Brazilian EFL learners’ awareness about L2 phones: Is mall pronounced as ‘mal’?Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, (), –. 10.1590/010318135071200021
     https://doi.org/10.1590/010318135071200021 [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Hessen, A. J., & Schouten, M. E. H.
    (1992) Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.403842
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.403842 [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Leussen, J.-W., & Escudero, P.
    (2015) Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: the L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., and Escudero, P.
    (2023) Feature-driven new sound category formation: computational implementation with the L2LP model and beyond. Front. Lang. Sci. :. 10.3389/flang.2023.1303511
     https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2023.1303511 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yazawa, K.
    (2024) NEW sounds can be easier to learn than SIMILAR sounds, but only when acoustic cues are FAMILIAR. Tsukuba English Studies, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    (2022) Praat: doing phonetics by computer ƐComputer program]. Version 6.2.18, retrieved2 September 2022fromwww.praat.org/
  35. Lehiste, Ilse
    (1970) Suprasegmentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
Loading
Effects of vocabulary size on the perception of L2 phonological categories
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
/content/journals/10.1075/ml.25026.luc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: first language ; speech perception ; phonological acquisition ; second language ; vocabulary size

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error