1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In most models of psychotherapy metaphor is considered an important aspect of communication. At the same time there is a need for a rationale to tell the clinician with what purpose and how to use metaphor for the benefit of the client. The present article suggests such principles, specifically based on a behavioral approach to human language, relational frame theory (RFT). This approach has co-developed with a specific model of psychotherapy: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and the conclusions in this article are very much in line with that model. Overlap between RFT and a recent linguistic theory of metaphor, the dynamic approach, is also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00004.tor
2020-11-13
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angus, L. E., & Greenberg, L. S.
    (2011) Working with narrative in emotion-focused therapy: Changing stories, healing lives. Washington: American Psy-chological Association. 10.1037/12325‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/12325-000 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1482–1493.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Combs, G., & Freedman, J.
    (1990) Symbol, story and ceremony: Using metaphor in individual and family therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B.
    (eds.) (2001) Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. NewYork: Plenum. 10.1007/b108413
    https://doi.org/10.1007/b108413 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z.
    (1986) Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256. 10.1901/jeab.1986.45‑237
    https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G.
    (2012) Acceptance and commitment therapy. The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K.
    (1996) Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168. 10.1037/0022‑006X.64.6.1152
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152 [Google Scholar]
  8. Horvath, A. O.
    (2018) Research on the alliance: Knowledge in search of a theory, Psychotherapy Research, 28:4, 499–516. 10.1080/10503307.2017.1373204
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1373204 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lord S. P., Sheng, E., Imel Z.E., Baer J. & Atkins, D.C.
    (2015) More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior Therapy. 46:296–303. 10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Luciano, C.
    (2017) The self and responding to your own behavior. Implications of coherence and hierarchical framing. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 17, 267–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Cabello-Luque, F., & Hernández, M.
    (2009) Developing self-directed rules. InR. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (ed.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (p.335–352). Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathieson, F., Jordan, J., Carter, J. & Stubbe, M.
    (2015) Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy1(2), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McHugh, L., Stewart, I. & Almada, P.
    (2019) A contextual behavioral guide to the self. Theory and practice. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McMullen, L. M.
    (2008) Putting it in context: Metaphor and psychotherapy. InR. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (p.397–411). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.024 [Google Scholar]
  17. Müller, C.
    (2008) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and walking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Müller, C., & Cienki, A.
    (2009) Words, gestures and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. InC. J. Forceville & E. Urio-Aparisi (ed.), Multimodal metaphor (p.297–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Needham-Didsbury, I.
    (2014) Metaphor in psychotherapeutic discourse: Implications for utterance interpretation. Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, 50, 75–97. 10.1515/psicl‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Hora, D. & Barnes-Holmes, D.
    (2004) Instructional control: developing a relational frame analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy11, p.263–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ramnerö, J. & Törneke, N.
    (2008) The ABCs of human behavior: Behavioral principles for the practicing clinician. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Semin, G. R. & Cacioppo, J. T.
    (2008) Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, coordination, and co-regulation. InSemin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (ed) Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientic approaches. (p.119–147) New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805837.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805837.006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Skinner, B. F.
    (1966) An operant analysis of problem solving. InB. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp.133–171) NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D.
    (2001) Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective. Behavior Analyst, 24, 191–199. 10.1007/BF03392030
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392030 [Google Scholar]
  25. Steen, G. J.
    (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor–now new and improved. Review of cognitive linguistics, 9:1, 26–64. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
  26. Stine, J. J.
    (2005) The use of metaphors in the service of the therapeutic alliance and therapeutic communication. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry33, 531–545. 10.1521/jaap.2005.33.3.531
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2005.33.3.531 [Google Scholar]
  27. Stott, R., Mansell, W., Salkovskis, P., Lavender, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S.
    (2010) Oxford guide to metaphors in CBT: Building cognitive bridges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/med:psych/9780199207497.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199207497.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tay, D.
    (2013) Metaphor in psychotherapy: A descriptive and prescriptive analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamimins Publishing Co.. 10.1075/milcc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Törneke, N.
    (2017) Metaphor in practice. A professional’s guide to using the science of language in psychotherapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Törneke, N., Luciano, C., & Valdivia Salas, S.
    (2008) Rule-governed behaviour and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Törneke, N., Luciano, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Bond, F.
    (2016) RFT for clinical practice: Three core strategies in understanding and treating human suffering. InR. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & T. Biglan (ed.), Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (p.254–272). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Villatte, M., Villatte, J. L., & Hayes, S. C.
    (2016) Mastering the clinical conver-sation: Language as intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00004.tor
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error