1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In recent years, studies from social/cultural geography and social psychology have shown the importance of the subjective experience of space in anxiety disorders. This study investigates how lived space in anxiety is discursively negotiated in interactional narratives, with a focus on the co-construction of time, physical space and epistemic modality, and the ways in which metaphors contribute to the representation of spatial experience. The data are two case studies taken from television programmes in which a figure in the public eye is being interviewed about their experiences of anxiety. The analysis showcases two distinct kinds of lived space in anxiety, one in which the self is continually moving through a space experienced as too expansive, and another in which other people/entities are moving around the self in a space experienced as too small. Both experiences involve spatial responses that serve to bring some relief from anxiety. The analysis also has methodological implications by exemplifying how metaphors feed into spatial gestalts that are collaboratively constructed as narratives unfold in situated interaction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00005.kna
2020-11-13
2021-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association
    American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. American Psychiatric Association
    American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg, M.
    (2006) Stories: big or small. Why do we care?Narrative Inquiry, 16(1): 139–147. 10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L.
    (2007) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2): 197–222. 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, L. & Deignan, A.
    (2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4): 671–690. 10.1093/applin/aml032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P. & Stanley, N.
    (2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2): 63–89. 10.1080/10926480902830821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cap, P.
    (2014) Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: a proximisation analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics, 70: 16–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton, P.
    (2004) Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2014) Language, Space and Mind: the Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson, J.
    (2000) ‘...the world was getting smaller’: women, agoraphobia and bodily boundaries, Area, 32(1): 31–40. 10.1111/j.1475‑4762.2000.tb00112.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00112.x [Google Scholar]
  11. (2001) Fear and trembling in the mall. Women, agoraphobia, and body boundaries. InI. Dyck, N. Davis Lewis & S. McLafferty (eds.), Geographies of Women’s Health (pp.213–230). London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deignan, A., Littlemore, J. & Semino, E.
    (2013) Figurative Language, Genre and Register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Demmen, J., Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P. & Payne, S.
    (2015) A computer-assisted study of the use of violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2): 205–231. 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.03dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.03dem [Google Scholar]
  14. Etelämäki, M. & Visapää, L.
    (2014) Why blend conversation analysis with cognitive grammar?Pragmatics, 24(3): 477–506. 10.1075/prag.24.3.03ete
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.03ete [Google Scholar]
  15. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. InR. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics (pp.31–59). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2006) Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis, Narrative Inquiry, 16(1): 122–130. 10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo [Google Scholar]
  17. (2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Giaxoglou, K.
    (2015) ‘Everywhere I go, you’re going with me’: Time and space deixis as affective positioning resources in shared moments of digital mourning. Discourse, Context & Media, 9: 55–63. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Giele, C. L., van den Hout, M. A., Engelhard, I. M., Dek, E. C. P., & Klein Hofmeijer, F.
    (2011) Obsessive-compulsive reasoning makes an unlikely catastrophe more credible. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 293–297. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hart, C.
    (2014) Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hartman, J.
    (2019) Conditionals in therapy and counselling sessions: therapists’ and clients’ uses of what-if constructions, Journal of Pragmatics, 140: 112–126. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackendoff, R.
    (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) Transcription notation. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Interaction (pp.ix–xvi). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimmel, M.
    (2005) Culture regained: situated and compound image schemas. InHampe, B. (ed.) From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.285–311). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.4.285
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.4.285 [Google Scholar]
  26. Knapton, O.
    (2016) Dynamic conceptualizations of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Language and Cognition, 8(1): 1–31. 10.1017/langcog.2015.18
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.18 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Langlotz, A.
    (2015) Creating Social Orientation through Language: A Socio-cognitive Theory of Situated Social Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.17 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McGrath, L., Reavey, P., & Brown, S. D.
    (2008) The scenes and spaces of anxiety: embodied expressions of distress in public and private fora. Emotion, Space and Society, 1(1), 56–64. 10.1016/j.emospa.2008.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. McManus, S., Bebbington, P., Jenkins, R., & Brugha, T.
    (eds.) (2016) ‘Mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014’. Leeds: NHS digital.
  32. Ochs, E. & Capps, L.
    (1995) Out of place: narrative insights into agoraphobia. Discourse Processes, 19(3): 407–439. 10.1080/01638539509544925
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544925 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1): 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  34. Riskind, J. H.
    (1997) Looming vulnerability to threat: a cognitive paradigm for anxiety, Behaviour Research & Therapy, 35(8): 685–702. 10.1016/S0005‑7967(97)00011‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00011-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Segal, E. M.
    (1995) Narrative comprehension and role of Deictic Shift Theory. InJ. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective (pp.3–17). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Segrott, J. & Doel, M. A.
    (2004) Disturbing geography: obsessive-compulsive disorder as spatial practice. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 597–614. 10.1080/1464936042000317721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000317721 [Google Scholar]
  37. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A. & Rayson, P.
    (2017) The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care7: 60–66. 10.1136/bmjspcare‑2014‑000785
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stokoe, E. & Edwards, D.
    (2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1): 56–65. 10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
  39. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tolin, D. F., Worhunsky, P., & Maltby, N.
    (2004) Sympathetic magic in contamination- related OCD. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35(2): 193–205. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  41. Verschueren, J.
    (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zima, E. & Brône, G.
    (2015) Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition, 7(4): 485–498. 10.1017/langcog.2015.19
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.19 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00005.kna
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00005.kna
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anxiety , interactional narratives , situated interaction , spatial experience and spatial gestalts
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error