1887
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates the use of friendship metaphors in texts by adult second language writers, in relation to the occurrence and function of metaphor and the writers’ discursive constructions of identity. The texts come from the final assessment in Swedish for Immigrants (SFI), a language program in basic Swedish. The analysis confirmed the initial assumption that the emotional and existentially loaded theme of allows for the use of metaphor. The results also showed that the experience of writers as newcomers in Sweden played out in the metaphors that were used and their contexts.

In order to categorize the found metaphors, a model was developed to show how reflect functions and values related to three thematic categories: , and . For several metaphors, the metaphoricity was created through novel and unidiomatic wording, i.e. a kind of neologism that can be considered a communication strategy.

The importance of using universal and abstract themes in language testing is emphasized, to enable second language writers to express different facets of experience and knowledge through existential thoughts and attitudes – not only as language learners and newcomers, but also as social agents who create and keep transnational relations through friends.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
2021-10-12
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/msw.00019.ahl.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahearn, L.
    (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlgren, K.
    (2014) Narrativa identiteter och levande metaforer i ett andraspråksperspektiv (Narrative identities and living metaphors from a second language perspective) (PhD thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. (2016) Teoretisk utveckling och framtida utmaningar: Nationella prov i svenska för invandrare. Kieli, koulutus ja yhteiskunta – Language, Education and Society, 7(6), 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2020) ”Un voyage sans fin”: expressions métaphoriques et mudes linguistiques de nouveau locuteurs suédois, Language et société, 170(2), 209–128. 10.3917/ls.170.0109
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.170.0109 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahlgren, K. & Rydell, M.
    (2020) Continuity and change: migrants’ experiences of adult language education in Sweden. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 11(3), 399–414. 10.3384/rela.2000‑7426.ojs1680
    https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.ojs1680 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anthias, F.
    (2016) Interconnecting boundaries of identity and belonging and hierarchy-making within transnational mobility studies: Framing inequalities. Current Sociology Monograph, 64, 271–190. 10.1177/0011392115614780
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115614780 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bachman, L. F.
    (1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bachman, L., & Palmer, L.
    (1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdsell, B. J.
    (2018) Creative Metaphor Production in a First and Second Language and the Role of Creativity. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruner, J. S.
    (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2001) Self-making and word-making. InJ. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative and Identity Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture (pp.25–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/sin.1.03bru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.1.03bru [Google Scholar]
  12. Cameron, L.
    (2003) Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2004) Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 107–136. 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2007) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18(2), 179–222. 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2008) Metaphor in the construction of a learning environment. InE. Berendt (Ed.), Metaphors for Learning (pp.159–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.22.12cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.22.12cam [Google Scholar]
  16. Cameron, L. & Besser, S.
    (2004) Writing in English as an Additional Language at Key Stage 2. Leeds: University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
    (2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 63–89. 10.1080/10926480902830821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821 [Google Scholar]
  18. Canale, M., & Swain, M.
    (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Celce-Murcia, M.
    (2007) Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language in language teaching. InE. Alcón & M. P. Safont Jord (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp.41–57). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑5639‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Fina, A.
    (2015) Narrative and identities. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp.351–368). Malden, MA: John Wiley. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deppermann, A.
    (2015) Positioning. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp.369–387). Malden, MA: John Wiley. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ekberg, L.
    (1997) Diskursiva och syntaktiska mönster i återberättelser hos invandrarbarn i Rosengård (Discursive and syntactic patterns in immigrant children’s recounts in Rosengård). InG. Håkansson, L. Lötmarker, L. Santesson & J. Svensson (Eds.), Svenskans beskrivning22. Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2004) Grammatik och lexikon i svenska som andraspråk på nästan infödd nivå. In: Hyltenstam, K. & Lindberg, I. (eds.) Svenska som andraspråk i forskning, utbildning och samhälle (Swedish as a second language in research, education and society). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, R.
    (2002) A metaphorical analysis of learners’ beliefs. InP. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (eds.), An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode (pp.163–197). Triser: Wissenschaftlig Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Golden, A.
    (2017) Emotions negotiated in L2 texts: A corpus study of written production by adult learners on a Norwegian test. InA. Golden, S. Jarvis & K. Tenfjord (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Influence and Distinctive Patterns of Language Learning Findings and Insights from a Learner Corpus (pp.188–230). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098774‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098774-010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.
    (2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hasan, R.
    (2007) Private pleasure, public discourse: reflections on engaging with literature. InD. Miller & M. Turci (Eds.), Language and Verbal Art Revisited. Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature (pp.13–40). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinkel, E.
    (2003) Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 275–301. 10.2307/3588505
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588505 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoang, H.
    (2019) Metaphorical language in second language learners’ texts: Additional baggage of the writing journey? Observing writing. InE. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp.236–257). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004392526_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_012 [Google Scholar]
  30. Holzberg, B., Kolbe, K., & Zaborowski, R.
    (2018) Figures of crisis: The delineation of (un)deserving refugees in the German media. Sociology, 52(3), 534–550. 10.1177/0038038518759460
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518759460 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jörgensen, N. J., Karrebæk, M. S., Madsen, L. M. & Møller, J. S.
    (2011) Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 22–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kövecses, Z.
    (1995) American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2000) Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kristensson Uggla, B.
    (1999) Kommunikation på bristningsgränsen. En studie i Paul Ricœurs projekt (Communication on the breaking point. A study of Paul Ricœur’s project). Stockholm: Brutus Östling.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Littlemore, J.
    (2001) Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style?TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 459–491. 10.2307/3588031
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588031 [Google Scholar]
  37. Littlemore, J., Krennmayer, T., Turen, J., & Turner, S.
    (2014) An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. 10.1093/applin/amt004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Littlemore, J., & Low, G.
    (2006) Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627567
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627567 [Google Scholar]
  39. MacArthur, F.
    (2010) Metaphorical competence in EFL: Where are we and where should we be going? A view from the language classroom. AILA Review, 23(1), 155–173. 10.1075/aila.23.09mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.09mac [Google Scholar]
  40. McNamara, Tim
    2001 Language assessments as social practice: challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349. 10.1177/026553220101800402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800402 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nacey, S.
    (2013) Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. National Agency for Education
    National Agency for Education (2017) Skolverkets föreskrifter för kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (Regulations for municipal adult education in Swedish for immigrants). SKOLFS 2017:91.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. National Agency for Education
    National Agency for Education (2019) Elever och studieresultat i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare år 2018 (Students and study results in municipal adult education in Swedish for immigrants 2018). Stockholm: Skolverket.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pitzl, M-L.
    (2017) Communicative ‘success’, creativity and the need for de-mystifying L1 use: Some thought on EFT and ELT. Lingue e Linguaggi, 24, 37–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2018) Creativity in English as lingua franca: Idiom and metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501510083
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510083 [Google Scholar]
  46. Prentice, J.
    (2010) På rak sak. Om ordförbindelser och konventionaliserade uttryck bland unga språkbrukare i flerspråkiga miljöer (On conventionalized expressions among young language users in multilingual settings) (Ph.D. thesis). Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ricœur, P.
    (1975) La métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rydell, M.
    (2018) Construction of Language Competence. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Assessing Second Language Interaction in Basic Adult Education (PhD thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sabet, M. K. & Tavakoli, M.
    (2016) Metaphorical competence: A neglected component of communicative competence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shohamy, E.
    (2011) Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418–429. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01210.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01210.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Zanotto, M., Cameron, L. & Cavalcanti, M.
    (2008) Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/pbns.173
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error