Review of Pérez-Sobrino, Littlemore & Ford (2021): Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising

References

1. Blomberg, J. & Zlatev, J.
   (2015) Non-actual motion: Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 153–157. 10.1007/s10339‑015‑0689‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0689-6 [Google Scholar]
2. Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C.
   (2011) Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), 149–157. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A.
   (2012) From novel to familiar: tuning the brain for metaphors. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3212–3221. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079 [Google Scholar]
4. Dehay, E. K., & Landwehr, J. R.
   (2019) A MAP for effective advertising: The metaphoric advertising processing model. AMS Review, 1–15. 10.1007/s13162‑018‑0131‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0131-1 [Google Scholar]
5. Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E.
   (2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S.
   (2011) The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2376–2386. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21596
   https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21596 [Google Scholar]
7. Esbrí-Blasco, M.
   (2020) “Cooking in the mind”: a frame-based contrastive study of culinary metaphors in American English and Peninsular Spanish. (Doctoral Dissertation). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I. 10.6035/14110.2020.189904
   https://doi.org/10.6035/14110.2020.189904
8. Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K.
   (2011) Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising a structural, conceptual, and pragmatic investigation. Journal of Advertising, 40(1).103–120.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H., & Spivey, M.
   (2014) Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 410. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410 [Google Scholar]
10. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2013) The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339. 10.1515/ip‑2013‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014 [Google Scholar]
11. Kashanizadeh, Z., & Forceville, C.
    (2020) Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy: A study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7(1) 78–110. 10.1075/cogls.00050.kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00050.kas [Google Scholar]
12. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
13. Kövecses, Z.
    (2008) Universality and variation in the use of metaphor. InN.-L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (eds), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals. Stockholm University: Stockholm, 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics21(4), 663–97. 10.1515/cogl.2010.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.021 [Google Scholar]
15. Kövecses, Z.
    (2015) Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Kövecses, Z.
    (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
17. Littlemore, J.
    (2019) Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241441
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441 [Google Scholar]
18. Pérez Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D.
    (2018) The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 957–991. 10.1093/applin/amy039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy039 [Google Scholar]
19. Pragglejazz Group
    Pragglejazz Group (2007) MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse, Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
20. Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
    (2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
    (2007) High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behaviour. InK. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. InB. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.009 [Google Scholar]
23. Samur, D., Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M.
    (2015) Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 781, 108–114. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.003 [Google Scholar]
24. Šorm, E., & Steen, G.
    (2018) VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor Identification. InSteen, G. (Ed.), Visual metaphor: structure and process (pp.47–88) John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.18.03sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.03sor [Google Scholar]
25. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
26. Van Mulken, M., Le Pair, R., & Forceville, C.
    (2010) The impact of perceived complexity, deviation and comprehension on the appreciation of visual metaphor in advertising across three European countries. Journal of Pragmatics42(12):3418–3430. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.030 [Google Scholar]
27. Yu, N.
    (2008) Metaphor from Body and Culture. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]