Review of Šeškauskienė (2022): Metaphor in Legal Discourse

References

1. Anthony, L.
   (2015) AntConc(Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
   [Google Scholar]
2. Charteris-Black, J.
   (2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Macmillan-Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230000612
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
3. Marín Pérez, M. J., & Rea Rizzo, C.
   (2012) Structure and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): a legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK. Journal of English Studies, 101, 131–145. 10.18172/jes.184
   https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.184 [Google Scholar]
4. Pragglejaz Group
   Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A Method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1). 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
5. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
   (2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/celcr.14
   https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
6. Stefanowitsch, A.
   (2007) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. InA. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries. (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, (pp.63–105). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199895.63
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895.63 [Google Scholar]
7. Wojtczak, S. & Witczak-Plisiecka, I.
   (2019) Metaphors and Legal Language: a Few Comments on Ordinary, Specialised and Legal Meaning. Research in Language, 17 (3), 273–295. 10.18778/1731‑7533.17.3.04
   https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.17.3.04 [Google Scholar]