1887
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article offers my personal assessment of the recent efforts to censor certain metaphors in higher education within the United States. Many universities have created extensive speech codes that censor various metaphorical words and phrases for their potential harm, especially for possibly being offensive to different individuals and marginalized communities. I discuss some of the problems with these efforts and offer a brief defense of the importance of metaphors, good or bad, in our public conversations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00041.gib
2023-12-18
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bleske-Rechek, A., Deaner, R. O., Paulich, K. N., Axelrod, M., Badenhorst, S., Nguyen, K., Seyoum, E., & Lay, P. S.
    (2023) In the eye of the beholder: Situational and dispositional predictors of perceiving harm in others’ words. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 111902. 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111902
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111902 [Google Scholar]
  2. Colston, H., & Gibbs, R.
    (2021) Figurative language communicates directly because it precisely demonstrates what we mean. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 751, 228–233. 10.1037/cep0000254
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000254 [Google Scholar]
  3. Gibbs, R.
    (1992) What do idioms really mean?Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 485–506. 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90025‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90025-S [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibbs, R., Strom, L., & Spivey-Knowlton, M.
    (1997) Conceptual metaphor in mental imagery for proverbs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 211, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jansen, S., & Martin, B.
    (2015) The Streisand effect and censorship backfire. International Journal of Communication, 91, 656–671.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lilienfeld, S. O.
    (2017) Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological science, 121, 138–169. 10.1177/1745691616659391
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616659391 [Google Scholar]
  7. Roemer, E., & Borkovec, T.
    (1994) Effects of suppressing thoughts about emotional material. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1031, 467–474. 10.1037/0021‑843X.103.3.467
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.3.467 [Google Scholar]
  8. Smolla, R.
    (2019) The meaning of the “marketplace of ideas” in First Amendment Law. Communication Law and Policy, 241, 437–475. 10.1080/10811680.2019.1660552
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1660552 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.00041.gib
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): censorship; free speech; literal paraphrases; offensive metaphors; speech codes
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error