Review of Piata (2018): The Poetics of Time — Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature

References

1. Boroditsky, L.
   (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 751, 1–28. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00073‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 [Google Scholar]
2. Charolles, M. & Schnedecker, C.
   (1993) Coréférence et identité. Le problème des référents évolutifs. Langages, 1121, 106–126. 10.3406/lgge.1993.1664
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1993.1664 [Google Scholar]
3. Crisp, P.
   (2008) Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough?Language and Literature, 17(4), 291–308. 10.1177/0963947008095960
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947008095960 [Google Scholar]
4. De Mulder, W. & Schnedecker, C.
   (2001) Les référents évolutifs entre linguistique et philosophie. Paris-Metz, Klincksieck-Université de Metz.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
   (2002) The way we think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Freeman, M. H.
   (2000) Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp.253–281). Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gijssels, T., & Casasanto, D.
   (2017) Conceptualizing time in terms of space: Experimental evidence. InDancygier, B. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.651–668). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.041
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.041 [Google Scholar]
8. Gréa, P.
   (2002) Intégration conceptuelle et métaphore filée. Langue française, 1341, 109–123. 10.3406/lfr.2002.6456
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.2002.6456 [Google Scholar]
9. Gréa, P.
   (2003) Les limites de l’intégration conceptuelle. Languages. La constitution extrinsèque du référent, 1501, 61–74. 10.3406/lgge.2003.915
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2003.915 [Google Scholar]
10. Greimas, A. J.
    (2012) Du sens I. Essais sémiotiques. Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jakobson, R.
    (1987) Language in literature. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kövesces, Ζ.
    (2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. 10.1515/cogl.2010.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.021 [Google Scholar]
13. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vols.1–21). Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Piata, A. & Pagán Cánovas, C.
    (2017) Powerful rhyme and sluttish time: A cross-linguistic study of time personification in poetic discourse. Language and Literature, 26(1), 18–33. 10.1177/0963947016674142
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947016674142 [Google Scholar]
17. Semino, E. & Steen, G.
    (2008) Metaphor in literature. InR. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.232–246). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015 [Google Scholar]
18. Stockwell, P.
    (2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Tsur, R.
    (2008) Toward a theory of cognitive poetics (2nd, expanded and updated ed.). Sussex Academic Press. 10.2307/j.ctv3029jb1
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv3029jb1 [Google Scholar]