1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study aims at exploring the evocative power of metaphor in a number of remarkable American political speeches. The investigation concentrates on the metaphorical framing of political issues in terms of light and darkness. The analysis is carried out on a corpus consisting of the top 100 political speeches in the twentieth century according to a ranking given by American rhetoricians in a national survey (http://www. news.wisc.edu/misc/speeches). Overall, the study shows how the metaphorical uses of the evocative concepts of light and darkness have facilitated the communication of central political ideas, values and beliefs in twentieth century American political rhetoric.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.16025.deg
2018-10-23
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2011) Politician and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chilton, P. A.
    (1996) Security metaphors. Cold War discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockcroft, R., & Cockcroft, S.
    (2014) Persuading people. An introduction to rhetoric (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑05527‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05527-9 [Google Scholar]
  5. Degani, M.
    (2015) Framing the rhetoric of a leader. An analysis of Obama’s election campaign speeches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137471598
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137471598 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deignan, A.
    (2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Edelman, M.
    (1971) Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago, IL: Markham.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1977) Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1988) Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedenberg, R. V.
    (2002) Notable speeches in contemporary presidential campaigns. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heinrichs, J.
    (2010) Winning arguments. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Howe, N.
    (1988) Metaphor in American contemporary political discourse. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3, 87–104. 10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2004) Don’t think of an elephant. Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller, E. F.
    (1979) Metaphor and political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 73(1), 155–170. 10.2307/1954738
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1954738 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mio, J. S.
    (1997) Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(2), 113–133. 10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Musolff, A.
    (2009) Metaphor in the history of ideas and discourses: How can we interpret a medieval version of the body-state analogy?InA. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp.233–247). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230594647_15
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_15 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ortony, A.
    (1975) Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25(1), 45–53. 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.1975.tb00666.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Osborn, M.
    (1967) Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light‐dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53(2), 115–126. 10.1080/00335636709382823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636709382823 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) A practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ritter, K., & Medhurst, M. J.
    (Eds.) (2004) Presidential speechwriting. From the New Deal to the Reagan revolution and beyond. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.16025.deg
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.16025.deg
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error