1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 8, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

When people produce or understand verbal metaphors, and metaphoric gestures, do they do so automatically or with conscious deliberation? Metaphor scholars widely recognize that the answer to this question depends on several factors, including the specific kind of metaphor that was produced or understood. But many scholars assume that the automatic use of metaphor involves the simple retrieval of its figurative meaning, without having to draw any cross-domain mappings. We argue that automaticity in behavior, such as when using verbal metaphors, actually involves many complex embodied and conceptual processes, even if these may operate quickly and without conscious attention. This article reviews the evidence for this claim, and considers other attempts to explore automaticity in metaphoric experiences, such as in 20th-century automatic writing practices. Our argument provides another set of reasons, from cognitive science research, to reject simplistic assumptions that automatic metaphor behavior is necessarily different in kind from more conscious metaphor use and understanding.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.16026.gib
2018-05-07
2024-10-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.16026.gib
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bargh, J.
    (1994) The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. , & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.) (pp.1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bargh, J. , Schwader, K. , Hailey, S. , Dyer, R. , & Boothby, E.
    (2012) Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(12) 593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergen, B.
    (2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Breton, A.
    (1969) Manifestoes of surrealism, R. Seaver & H. Lane , Trans.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.7558
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7558 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carney, D. , Cuddy, A. , & Yap, A.
    (2010) Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays cause changes in neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383437
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437 [Google Scholar]
  6. Casasanto, D.
    (2008) Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?Memory & Cognition, 36, 1047–1056. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1047 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cienki, A.
    (1998) STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cienki, A. , & Müller, C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Conely, K.
    (2003) Robert Desnos, surrealism, and the marvelous in everyday life. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M.
    (1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dijksterhuis, A. , & Nordgren, L.
    (2006) A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 95–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2006.00007.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Epstein-Jannai, M.
    (2010) Some remarks about semi-automatic writing: Between constraints and possibilites in a writing workshop. New Writing, 7, 58–75. doi: 10.1080/14790721003599483
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790721003599483 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibbs, R.
    (1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2011) Are deliberate metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World. 1, 26–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107762350
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibbs, R. , & Colston, H.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibbs, R. , Kushner, J. , & Mills, R.
    (1991) Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 11–30. doi: 10.1007/BF01076917
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076917 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibbs, R. , Beitel, D. , Harrington, M. , & Sanders, P.
    (1994) Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Giora, R.
    (2002) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2008) Is metaphor unique?In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.143–160). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gildea, P. , & Glucksberg, S.
    (1983) On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 577–590. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(83)90355‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Glucksberg, S. , Gildea, P. , & Bookin, H.
    (1982) On understanding nonliteral speech: can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 85–98. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(82)90467‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grice, H.
    (1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Helmholtz, H.
    (1925) Treatise on physiological optics, VolumeII. The Optical Society of America 1925.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. James, W.
    (1890) The principles of psychology. New York: MacMillan. doi: 10.1037/11059‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/11059-000 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kelly, S. , Creigh, P. , & Bartolotti, J.
    (2010) Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop task: Evidence for automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 683–694. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21254
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21254 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kazmerski, V. , Blasko, D. , & Dessalegn, B.
    (2003) ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 31, 673–689. doi: 10.3758/BF03196107
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196107 [Google Scholar]
  30. Keysar, B.
    (1989) On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 375–385. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90017‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90017-X [Google Scholar]
  31. Koutstaal, W.
    (1992) Skirting the abyss: A history of experimental explorations of automatic writing in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 5–27. doi: 10.1002/1520‑6696(199201)28:1<5::AID‑JHBS2300280102>3.0.CO;2‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199201)28:1<5::AID-JHBS2300280102>3.0.CO;2-X [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) The agile mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (Vol.2) (pp.202–251). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lakoff, G. , & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Landau, M. , Robinson, M. , & Meier, B.
    (Eds.) (2014) The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: APA Press. doi: 10.1037/14278‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-000 [Google Scholar]
  37. Langton, S. , & Bruce, V.
    (2007) You must see the point: Automatic processing of curs to the direction of social attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 247–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Müller, C.
    (2007) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamics view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Muldoon, P.
    (2007) The end of the poem: Oxford lectures. London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Murphy, G.
    (1996) On metaphoric representations. Cognition, 60, 173–204. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(96)00711‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1 [Google Scholar]
  41. Obermeier, C. , Holle, H. , & Gunter, T. C.
    (2011) What iconic gesture fragments reveal about gesture-speech integration: When synchrony is lost, memory can help. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1648–1663. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21498
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21498 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pinker, S.
    (2007) The stuff of thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Posner, M. , & Snyder, C.
    (1975) Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. (pp.669–692). New York: Academic Press,
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Restak, R.
    (1983) Is free will a fraud?Science Digest (October): 53–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Searle, J.
    (1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. (pp.92–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.
    (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  47. Solomons, M. , & Stein, G.
    (1896) Normal motor automatism. Psychological Review, 3, 492–512. doi: 10.1037/h0066163
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066163 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stanovich, K.
    (2005) The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Steen, G.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. doi: 10.1080/10926480802426753
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2015) Developing, testing, and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stroop, J. R.
    (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thomas, J.
    (1988) The use of automatic writing in self-analysis: A phenomenological examination (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8902293)
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Trotsky, L.
    (1930/1970) My life. New York: Pathfinder Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Williams, L. , & Bargh, J.
    (2008) Experiencing physical warm influences interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607. doi: 10.1126/science.1162548
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhong, C. , & Liljenquist, K.
    (2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. doi: 10.1126/science.1130726
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.16026.gib
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): automaticity; metaphor; psycholinguistics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error