1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous work has shown that the abstract use of the spatial prepositions and retains spatial meaning, such as containment and support that includes the control relationship between a located object (the figure) and a reference object (the landmark/ground) (Feist & Gentner, 2003Talmy, 1983). We extend these ideas to the case of metaphorical descriptions of emotion in Spanish—some of them featuring the emotion as a located entity in the person’s body, others featuring emotion as the ground in which the person’s body stands. Two rating experiments show that people judge emotions in Spanish as more controllable when they are described as located entities (the figure) than when they are described as grounds. We conclude that functional elements of the spatial meaning of the preposition in Spanish are extended to abstract uses in metaphor, affecting the perceived controllability of emotions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17015.rea
2018-10-23
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bloomfield, L.
    (1933) Language. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boers, F., & Lindstomberg, S.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: rationale, proposals and evaluation. InG. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & R. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.305–358). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D.
    (1999) Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. InM. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.90–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Casasanto, D.
    (2010) Space for thinking. InB. Bergen, V. Evans & J. Zinken (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: State of the art and new directions (pp.453–461). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1998) The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C.
    (2004) Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford, L. E., Margolis, S. M., Drake, J. T., & Murphy, M. E.
    (2006) Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for spatial representation of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 20, 1153–1169. 10.1080/02699930500347794
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500347794 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory and typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Demjén, Z.
    (2011) Motion and conflicted self-metaphors in the Sylvia Plath’s Smith journal, Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 7–25. 10.1075/msw.1.1.02dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.02dem [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, N.
    (2003) Constructions, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. InC. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, V., & Tyler, A.
    (2005) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The English prepositions of verticality. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada, 5, 11–42. 10.1590/S1984‑63982005000200002
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982005000200002 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2004) Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: The case of in. InRadden, G. & Panther, K. (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp.157–192). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Feist, M. I., & Gentner, D.
    (2003) Factors involved in the use of in and on. InR. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.390–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fetterman, A. K., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P.
    (2012) Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 1445–1458. 10.1080/02699931.2012.673477
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.673477 [Google Scholar]
  16. Garrod, S., Ferrier, G., & Campbell, S.
    (1999) In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72, 167–189. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00038‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00038-4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J.
    (1989) Discourse models as interfaces between language and the spatial world. Journal of Semantics, 6, 147–160. 10.1093/jos/6.1.147
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/6.1.147 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gentner, D., & Wolff, P.
    (1997) Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 331–355. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2527
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2527 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hampe, B.
    (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532 [Google Scholar]
  21. Harder, P.
    (2011) Conceptual construal and social construction. InM. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp.305–324). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1075/hcp.32.18har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.18har [Google Scholar]
  22. (2010) Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216059 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haslam, N.
    (2011) Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: commentary on Dar-Nimrod & Heine. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 819–824. 10.1037/a0022386
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022386 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hauser, D. J., Carter, M. S., & Meier, B. P.
    (2009) Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1166–1180. 10.1080/02699930802358424
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802358424 [Google Scholar]
  25. Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C.
    (2007) The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunt, D., & Carter, R.
    (2012) Seeing through the bell jar: Investigating linguistic patterns of psychological disorder, Journal of Medical Humanities, 33, 27–39. 10.1007/s10912‑011‑9163‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-011-9163-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jamrozik, A., & Gentner, D.
    (2015) Well-hidden regularities: Abstract uses of in and on retain an aspect of their spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 39, 1881–1911. 10.1111/cogs.12218
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12218 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kvaale, E. P., Gottdiener, W. H., & Haslam, N.
    (2013) Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-review of associations among laypeople. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 95–103. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.017 [Google Scholar]
  30. MacArthur, F.
    (2005) The competent horseman in a horseless world: Observations on a conventional metaphor in Spanish and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(1), 71–94. 10.1207/s15327868ms2001_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2001_3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Langacker, R.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Margolis, S. O., & Crawford, L. E.
    (2008) Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1401–1414. 10.1080/02699930701810335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701810335 [Google Scholar]
  35. Norman, R. M., Windell, D., & Manchanda, R.
    (2012) Examining differences in the stigma of depression and schizophrenia. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 58, 69–78. 10.1177/0020764010387062
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764010387062 [Google Scholar]
  36. Read, J., & Law, A.
    (1999) The relationship of causal beliefs and contact with users of mental health services to attitudes to the ‘mentally ill.’ International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 45, 216–229. 10.1177/002076409904500309
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002076409904500309 [Google Scholar]
  37. Reali, F., & Arciniegas, C.
    (2015) Metaphorical conceptualization of emotion in Spanish: Two studies on the role of framing. Metaphor and Social World, 5(1), 20–42. 10.1075/msw.5.1.02rea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.02rea [Google Scholar]
  38. Reali, F., Soriano, T., & Rodríguez, D.
    (2016) How we think about depression: The role of metaphorical framing. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(3), 127–136. 10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K.
    (2003) Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780. 10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schoeneman, T. J., Schoeneman, K. A., & Stallings, S.
    (2004) The “black struggle”: Metaphors of depression in Styron’s ‘Darkness Visible’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 325–46. 10.1521/jscp.23.3.325.35454
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.3.325.35454 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sperber, D.
    (1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Talmy, L.
    (1983) How language structures space. InH. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp.255–282). New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17015.rea
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17015.rea
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphors , emotion , Spanish and spatial language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error