1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/msw.17025.ses-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17025.ses
2018-05-07
2019-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2005) Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chilton, P.
    (2004) Analysing political discourse. Theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cienki, A.
    (1995) Metaphor in the “Strict Father” and “Nurturant Parent” cognitive models. Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 279–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (1994) The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2011) Are deliberate metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  6. (2015) Does deliberate metaphor have a future?Journal of Pragmatics90, 73–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goatly, A.
    (2007) Washing the brain. Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics. How Liberals and Conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2004) Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate – the essential guide for Progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Musolff, A.
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2014) The metaphor of the “body politic” across languages and cultures. In F. Polzenhagen , Z. Kövecses , S. Vogelbacher & S. Kleinke (Eds.), Cognitive explorations into metaphor and metonymy (pp.87–99). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2016a) Metaphor scenario analysis as part of cultural linguistics. Tekst i Dyskurs – Text und Diskurs, 9, 47–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2016b) Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 205–224.10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
  14. (2017) How metaphors can shape political reality. The figurative scenarios at the heart of Brexit. PiLaCS Papers in Language and Communication Studies, 1(1), 2–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  16. Steen, G. J.
    (2010) When is metaphor deliberate?In N. -L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp.43–63). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Steen, G. J. , Dorst, A. G. , Herrmann, J. B. , Kaal, A. A. , Krennmayr, T. , & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wodak, R.
    (2001) The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Mayer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.63–94). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17025.ses
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error