1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Degani, M. (2015). Framing the rhetoric of a leader: An analysis of Obama’s election campaign speeches, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/msw.17026.rei-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17026.rei
2018-05-07
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens, K.
    (2011) Examining conceptual metaphor models through lexical frequency patterns: A case study of U.S. presidential speeches. In S. Handl & H. J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp.167–184). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238198.167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238198.167 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahrens, K. , & Yat Mei Lee, S.
    (2009) Gender versus politics: When conceptual models collide in the US Senate. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp.62–82). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230245235
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cienki, A.
    (2004) Bush’s and Gore’s language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 3, 409–440. doi: 10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  4. (2005a) Metaphor in the “Strict Father” and “Nurturant Parent” cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 279–312. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.2.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.2.279 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2005b) The metaphorical use of family terms versus other nouns in political debates. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 27–39. doi: 10.1075/idjdd.13.1.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.04cie [Google Scholar]
  6. Deason, G. , & Gonzales, M. H.
    (2012) Moral politics in the 2008 presidential convention acceptance speeches. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 254–268. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2012.674450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.674450 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics. How liberals and conservative think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Moses, J. F. , & Gonzales, M. H.
    (2015) Strong candidate, nurturant candidate: Moral language in presidential television advertisements. Political Psychology, 36(4), 379–397. doi: 10.1111/pops.12160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12160 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ohl, J. J. , Pfister, D. S. , Nader, M. , & Griffin, D.
    (2013) Lakoff’s theory of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements 1952–2012 Communication Studies, 64(5), 488–507. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2013.832340.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.832340 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y. , Steen, G. J. , & Burgers, C.
    (2016) How to identify moral language in presidential speeches: A comparison between a social-psychological and a cognitive-linguistic approach to corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Steen, G. J.
    (2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1515/ip‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.17026.rei
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error