1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As part of an on-going project to apply metaphor analysis to understanding the cultural polarization that has recently obstructed discourse about political and cultural issues in both the United States and Europe, this essay examines the lexical, grammatical, and story metaphors in a recent editorial column, by conservative columnist Ross Douthat, that also focuses on this topic. In a key section of the essay, Douthat uses a blend of complex grammatical and lexical metaphors to highlight the contrast between the traditional American identity narrative of settlement and conquest and a recently emerged liberal counter-narrative, which Douthat epitomizes by quoting former President Obama’s repeated insistence that “That’s not who we are.” Douthat’s argument is contextualized by the reproduction of an image with the title “Engraving of a massacre of Indian women and children in Idaho by 19th century white settlers,” which strengthens the contrasts and implied ironies embedded in his complex combination of grammatical and lexical metaphors. These relationships are brought into sharp focus through the metaphor-led analysis of the text and its interaction with the image, demonstrating the value of this approach to discourse analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18019.rit
2019-11-05
2019-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W.
    (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–45. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergen, B. K.
    (2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. NYC: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. A.
    (2012) Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. InF. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sanchez-Garcia & A. M. Piquer-Piriz, (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp.51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Douthat, R.
    (2017) Who Are We?New York Times, Feb.4. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/opinion/who-are-we.html
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015) For the South, against the Confederacy: On the distinctive appeal of a “backwards” region. New York Times, June24. douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/24/for-the-south-against-the-confederacy/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2006) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00285.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1998) Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. InJ. R. Martin, & R. Veel, (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp.185–237). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (1999) Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London and New York: Cassel.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huntington, S. P.
    (2004) Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kintsch, W.
    (2008) How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. InGibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.129–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
    (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. 10.1037/0033‑295X.104.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mao, F.
    (2010) On cognition and function of grammatical metaphor. Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University.
  15. Morris, Wesley [Google Scholar]
  16. Obama, B.
    (2008) A more perfect union. Constitution Center, Philadelphia, PA, March18 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2013) Remarks by the President on climate change at Georgetown University. Retrieved fromwww.whitehouse.gov
  18. Ritchie, L. D.
    (2010) “Everybody goes down:” Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 123–143. 10.1080/10926488.2010.489383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.489383 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2012) Metaphor and stories in discourse about personal and social change. InB. Wagoner, E. Jensen, & J. Oldmeadow (Eds.), Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas (pp.99–118). London: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2017) Metaphorical stories in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316717172
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ritchie, L. D., Feliciano, A., & Sparks, A.
    (2018) Rhetorical confinement, contrasting metaphors, and cultural polarities: “Yes we can” meets “Carnage in the cities.” Metaphor and the Social World, 8(2), 247–266. 10.1075/msw.17014.rit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17014.rit [Google Scholar]
  22. Ritchie, L. D., & Thomas, M.
    (2015) A “glowing marble“: “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away“? Obama’s use of contrasting metaphors and stories in framing climate change. Metaphor and the Social World, 5, 1–19. 10.1075/msw.5.1.01rit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.01rit [Google Scholar]
  23. Ritchie, L. D., & Zhu, M.
    (2015) “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 118–136. 10.1080/10926488.2015.1016837
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016837 [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, G.
    (2019) Cattle, progress, and a victimized nation: Exploring metaphors in current and past immigration discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(2). 10.1075/msw.18011.smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18011.smi [Google Scholar]
  25. Soldini, S.
    (2000) Bread and tulips. (movie). Rome: Monogatori.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18019.rit
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): American national identity , cultural polarization , metaphor , narrative and Trumpism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error