1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The conceptualization of abstract concepts is very often metaphorical, meaning that we think and talk about abstract concepts in terms of other, usually more concrete experiences. Recent research suggests that many abstract concepts are linked to bodily sensations. In two experiments, we tested a hypothesis about weight as an embodiment of difficulty. We hypothesized that participants wearing a heavy backpack would judge a psychomotor task to be more difficult than participants wearing an empty backpack. We also hypothesized that manipulation of psychomotor task difficulty would affect judgement of backpack heaviness. In line with our hypothesis, the results demonstrated that participants wearing a heavy backpack judged the task to be more difficult. The results of Experiment 2 demonstrated that, regardless of task difficulty, there was no difference in weight judgement when backpack weight was estimated on a 7-point scale. However, we found a difference in the judgement of backpack weight when participants were asked to express it in kilograms, where weight was judged to be lower by participants doing the easy task than by those doing the difficult task.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18032.ton
2020-05-01
2020-05-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2010) Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712–1715. doi:  10.1126/science.1189993
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alban, M. W., & Kelley, C. M.
    (2013) Embodiment meets metamemory: Weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1628–1634. doi:  10.1037/e502412013‑338
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e502412013-338 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsalou, L. W.
    (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X99002149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:  10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boroditsky, L.
    (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00073‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
    (2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193–216. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G.
    (1993) Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.65.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T.
    (2015) What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?Linguistics Vanguard, 1, 327–337. doi:  10.1515/lingvan‑2014‑1015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, J.
    (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:  10.1037/0033‑2909.112.1.155
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Despot, K., Tonković, M., Brdar, M., Essert, M., Perak, B., Ostroški Anić, A., Nahod, B., & Pandžić, I.
    (2019) MetaNet.HR: Croatian metaphor repository. InBolognesi, M., Brdar, M. & Despot, K. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: Theory and methods for building figurative language repositories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/milcc.8.06des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.8.06des [Google Scholar]
  13. Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K., & Waymouth, S.
    (2009) Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964–969. 10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.964 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fauconnier, G.
    (1985) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gentner, D., & Grudin, J.
    (1985) The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 40, 181–192. 10.1037/0003‑066X.40.2.181
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
    (1984) The poetics of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511805844
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/9781107762350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning. Doctoral thesis, UC Berkeley.
  20. Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F.
    (2011) Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 87, 1–313. doi:  10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R.
    (2009) The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20, 1214–1220. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02434.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02434.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, C.
    (1997) Constructional grounding. Doctoral thesis, UC Berkeley.
  23. Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W.
    (2009) Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169–1174. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02426.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Kouchaki, M., Gino, F. & Jami, A.
    (2014) The burden of guilt: Heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 414–424. doi:  10.1037/a0031769
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031769 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:  10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. Chicago, IL: Basic Books. doi:  10.1163/156916478X00139
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156916478X00139 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G.
    (2008) The neural theory of metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.17–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511816802.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A.
    (2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067. doi:  10.1037/a0020970
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N.
    (2012) Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 737–749. doi:  10.1037/a0029708
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029708 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014) Metaphors in judgment and decision making. InM. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp.85–108). Washington, DC: APA. doi:  10.1037/14278‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., Kern, R., Viger, S. G., & Novak, N.
    (2007) Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 326–334. doi:  10.3758/BF03193164
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193164 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., & O’Brien, K.
    (2014) Replication of “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth” by Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 216–222. doi:  10.1027/1864‑9335/a000187
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000187 [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier, B. P., Hauser, D. J., Robinson, M. D., Friesen, C. K., & Schjeldahl, K.
    (2007) What’s ‘‘up’’ with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 699–710. 10.1037/0022‑3514.93.5.699
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.699 [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D.
    (2004) Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247. doi:  10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00659.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E., & Ahlvers, W. J.
    (2007) When ‘light’ and ‘dark’ thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 7, 366–376. doi:  10.1037/1528‑3542.7.2.366
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.366 [Google Scholar]
  36. Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J.
    (2012) Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705–716. doi:  10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2012.01212.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Pollio, H. R., Smith, M. K., & Pollio, M. R.
    (1990) Figurative language and cognitive psychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 141–167. 10.1080/01690969008402102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008402102 [Google Scholar]
  38. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]
    Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0] (2012) Retrieved fromwww.pstnet.com
  39. Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S.
    (2008) With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02227.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Schneider, I. K., Parzuchowski, M., Wojciszke, B., Schwarz, N. & Koole, S. L.
    (2015) Weighty data: Importance information influences estimated weight of digital information storage devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1536. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01536
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01536 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B. & Lakens, D.
    (2011) Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 474–478. doi:  10.1177/1948550610397895
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610397895 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schubert, T. W.
    (2005) Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.89.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N.
    (2014) Simulating sensorimotor metaphors: Novel metaphors influence sensory judgments. Cognition, 130, 309–314. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  44. Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., Toosi, N. R., & Ambady, N.
    (2012) The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 619–624. doi:  10.1037/a0027598
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027598 [Google Scholar]
  45. Spapé, M. M. & Serrien, D. J.
    (2010) Interregional synchrony of visuomotor tracking: Perturbation effects and individual differences. Behavioural Brain Research, 213, 313–318. doi:  10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.029 [Google Scholar]
  46. Szymkow, A., Chandler, J., IJzerman, H., Parzuchowski, M., & Wojciszke, B.
    (2013) Warmer hearts, warmer rooms. How positive communal traits increase estimates of ambient temperature. Social Psychology, 44, 167–176. doi:  10.1027/1864‑9335/a000147
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000147 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J.
    (1996) An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2008a) Experiencing physical warmth influences interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607. 10.1126/science.1162548
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2008b) Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302–308. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02084.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J.
    (2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19, 838–842. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K.
    (2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. doi:  10.1126/science.1130726
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18032.ton
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18032.ton
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): asymmetry , bidirectionality , embodied cognition , heavy and difficult , metaphor and primary metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error