1887
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

When talking about anticipated events, speakers can conceptualize them either as destinations towards which they are moving or as entities moving towards them, which correspond to the Ego- and the Time-moving metaphors, respectively (cf. ‘’ and ‘’). Research in psycholinguistics has shown affective valence, i.e. whether the conceptualized event is perceived as positive or negative, to be one of the factors that modulate metaphor choice; positive anticipation is preferentially associated with Ego-moving expressions, whereas negative anticipation is predominantly associated with Time-moving metaphors. This paper sets out to test if the time-affect association surfaces in naturally-occurring language use when both metaphorical patterns are available. By focusing on the temporal usage of the verb , we provide linguistic evidence in favor of such an affective bias in time representations. In addition, the language data point to a semantic preference for a particular type of event (i.e., personal vs social) under each metaphorical pattern. We interpret this finding as preliminary evidence for a possible semantic bias in time representations to be further investigated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18034.pia
2021-12-13
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, C.
    (2014) FrameNet: A knowledge base for natural language processing. InProceedings of frame semantics in NLP: A workshop in honor of Chuck Fillmore (1929-2014) (pp.1–5). Available online at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-3001.pdf. 10.3115/v1/W14‑3001
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednarek, M.
    (2008) Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139. 10.1515/CLLT.2008.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2008.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boroditsky, L.
    (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00073‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
    (2017) Moving-Time and Moving-Ego metaphors from a translational and contrastive linguistic perspective. Research in Language, 15(2), 191–212. 10.1515/rela‑2017‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0012 [Google Scholar]
  5. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2010) Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34, 387–405. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2010.01094.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01094.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, H. H.
    (1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. InΤ. Ε. Moore (Εd.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp.28–63). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Duffy, S.
    (2014) The role of cultural artifacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor & Symbol, 29(2), 94–112. 10.1080/10926488.2014.889989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.889989 [Google Scholar]
  9. Duffy, S., & Feist, M.
    (2014) Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(1), 29–54. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0030 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Power in time: The influence of power posing on metaphoric perspectives on time. Language & Cognition, 9(4), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duffy, S., Feist, M., & McCarthy, S.
    (2014) Moving through time: The role of personality in three real life contexts. Cognitive Science, 38(8), 1662–1674. 10.1111/cogs.12124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12124 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, V.
    (2003) The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2008) Rethinking metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.53–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005 [Google Scholar]
  14. Feist, M., & Duffy, S.
    (2020) On the path of time: Temporal motion in typological perspective. Language & Cognition, 12, 444–467. 10.1017/langcog.2020.7
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fillmore, C.
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. InS. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech (pp.20–32). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
  16. (1977) Scenes-and-frame semantics. InA. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing (pp.55–81). Dordrecht: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp.111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fillmore, C., & Baker, C. F.
    (2001) Frame semantics for text understanding. InProceedings of WordNet and other lexical resources workshop. Pittsburgh: NAACL. Available online at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/72cc/80486744320d5b9a2ea75e3fb1cde4ca669c.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2010) A frames approach to semantic analysis. InH. Bernd, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp.313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fontaine, J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C.
    (Eds.) (2013) Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592746.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592746.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Galati, D., Sini, B., Tinti, C., & Testa, S.
    (2008) The lexicon of emotion in the Neo-Latin languages. Social Science Information, 47, 205–220. 10.1177/0539018408089079
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408089079 [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haspelmath, M.
    (1997) From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hauser, D. J., Carter, M. S., & Meier, B. P.
    (2009) Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1166–1180. 10.1080/02699930802358424
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802358424 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, A., & Ji, L.
    (2014) Moving away from a bad past and toward a good future: Feelings influence the metaphorical understanding of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143(1), 21–26.   10.1037/a0032233
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032233 [Google Scholar]
  32. Margolies, S. O., & Crawford, E. L.
    (2008) Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, 22(7), 1401–1414.   10.1080/02699930701810335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701810335 [Google Scholar]
  33. McGlone, M., & Pfiester, A.
    (2009) Does time fly when you’re having fun, or do you? Affect, agency, and embodiment in temporal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(3), 3–31.   10.1177/0261927X08325744
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08325744 [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore, K. E.
    (2014) The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.42 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016) Elaborating time in space: The structure and function of space-motion metaphors of time. Language & Cognition, 1(2), 1–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Núñez, R.
    (1999) Could the future taste purple?InR. Núñez, & W. Freeman (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion (pp.41–60). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K.
    (2013) The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229.   10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  38. Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E.
    (2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450.   10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62 [Google Scholar]
  39. Partington, A.
    (2004) “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–156. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par [Google Scholar]
  40. Prosser, S.
    (2013) The passage of time. InA. Dyke, & H. Bardon (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of time (pp.315–327). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118522097.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522097.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  41. Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S.
    (1975) Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Radden, G.
    (2006) The metaphor time as space across languages. InE. Górska & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy-metaphor collage (pp.99–120). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2011) Spatial time in the West and the East. InM. Brdar, M. Omazic, V. P. Takac, T. Gradecak-Erdeljic & G. Buljan (Eds.), Space and time in language (pp.1–40). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Richmond, J., Wilson, J. C., & Zinken, J.
    (2012) A feeling for the future: How does agency in time metaphors relate to feelings?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 813–823. 10.1002/ejsp.1906
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1906 [Google Scholar]
  45. Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L., & Joiner, T. E.
    (2006) The looming cognitive style: A cognitive vulnerability for anxiety disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(7), 779–801. 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.7.779
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.7.779 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rovelli, C.
    (2017) The order of time. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J.
    (2006) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California. Distributed with the FrameNet data. Available online at: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/the_book
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Traugott, E. C.
    (1978) On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. InJ. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol.3, pp.369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J.
    (2008) Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 426–430. 10.3758/PBR.15.2.426
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.426 [Google Scholar]
  50. Frame Net (lexical database)
    Frame Net (lexical database): framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu
  51. Sketch Engine (corpus tool)
    Sketch Engine (corpus tool): https://www.sketchengine.eu
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18034.pia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.18034.pia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): affect; anticipated events; approach; event valence; metaphor; semantic preference; time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error