Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this work, I explore pain descriptions by women who live with the life-altering gynaecological disease of endometriosis. This condition causes incapacitating pain, which tends to be dismissed and normalised as part of the female condition (Cumberbatch, 2019). My aim is to explore the general patterns of pain conceptualisation by women with endometriosis and outline how an in-depth examination of salient elements of narrative scenarios may contribute towards providing a comprehensive understanding of the pain experience. I first examine patterns of metaphorical pain collocates from a corpus generated from online forum contributions. Following this, I explore metaphorical scenarios of pain, focusing on stories that reference popular texts or genres from a conceptual integration perspective. I argue that the combination of metaphor analysis of naturally-occurring data and conceptual intertextuality and interdiscursivity analysis in the metaphorical scenarios of elicited data constitute a methodological niche that allows a holistic assessment of the pain that can potentially be used in consultations and may help tackle the alarming diagnosis delay of endometriosis, which is currently 7.5 years.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abbott, H. P.
    (2008) The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816932 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldana-Reyes, X.
    (2014) Body Gothic: Corporeal transgression in contemporary literature and horror film. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, P.
    (2006) Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Botting, F.
    (2014) Gothic: The new critical idiom (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdel, N., & Alves, J., Pickering, G., Ramilo, I., Roman, H., & Canis, M.
    (2015) Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: How to choose a scale?Human Reproduction Update, 21(1), 136–152. doi:  10.1093/humupd/dmu046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu046 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bullo, S.
    (2014) Evaluation in advertising reception. A linguistic and socio-cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137350435
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350435 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2017) Investigating intertextuality and interdiscursivity in evaluation: The case of conceptual blending. Language and Cognition, 9(4), 709–727. 10.1017/langcog.2017.5
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2017.5 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2018) Exploring disempowerment in women’s accounts of endometriosis experiences. Discourse and Communication, 12(6), 569–586. 10.1177/1750481318771430
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771430 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2019) ‘I feel like I am being stabbed by a thousand tiny men’: The challenges of communicating endometriosis pain. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. doi:  10.1177/1363459318817943. [Epub ahead of print].
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459318817943 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press (2018) Cambridge online dictionary. Retrieved fromhttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/stab
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Culley, L., Law, C., Hudson, N., Denny, E., Mitchell, H., Baumgarten, M., & Raine-Fenning, N.
    (2013) The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: A critical narrative review. Human Reproduction Update, 19(6), 625–639. 10.1093/humupd/dmt027
    https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt027 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cumberbatch, A. G.
    (2019, January29). What is endometriosis?BBC Future. Retrieved fromwww.bbc.com/future/story/20190116-what-is-endometriosis
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dauenhauer, B., & Pellauer, D.
    (2016) Paul Ricoeur. In: E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy archive. Retrieved fromhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/ricoeur/
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Graaff, A. A., D’Hooghe, T. M., Dunselman, G. A. J., Dirksen, C. D., Hummelshoj, L., WERF EndoCost Consortium, & Simoens, S.
    (2013) The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: Results from an international cross-sectional survey. Human Reproduction, 28(10), 2677–2685. doi:  10.1093/humrep/det284
    https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det284 [Google Scholar]
  15. Demjen, Z., & Semino, E.
    (2017) Using metaphor in healthcare: Physical health. InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.385–399). Oxford and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dusenbery, M.
    (2018, May29). Everybody was telling me there was nothing wrong. BBC Future. Retrieved fromwww.bbc.com/future/story/20180523-how-gender-bias-affects-your-healthcare
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Endometriosis-UK
    Endometriosis-UK (n.d.). Information. Retrieved fromhttps://www.endometriosis-uk.org/information
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairclough, N.
    (1992) Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (1998) Blending as a central process of grammar. Retrieved from: www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2013/cs7601_spring/papers/Fauconnier_Turner.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gatchel, R. J., & Maddrey, A. M.
    (2004) The biopsychosocial perspective of pain. InJ. Raczynski & L. Leviton (Eds.), Healthcare psychology handbook. Vol II. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press. 10.1037/11589‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11589-011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibbs, R.
    (2015) Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gosden, T., Morris, P. G., Ferreira, N. B., Grady, C., & Gillanders, D. T.
    (2014) Mental imagery in chronic pain: Prevalence and characteristics. European Journal of Pain18, 721–728. doi:  10.1002/j.1532‑2149.2013.00409.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00409.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
    (1999) Blending and metaphor. InR. Gibbs and G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp.101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
  25. Hart, C.
    (2010) Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Houston, T., Cherrington, A., Coley, H., Robinson, K., Trobaugh, J., Williams, J., & Allison, J.
    (2011) The art and science of patient storytelling – Harnessing narrative communication for behavioral interventions: The ACCE Project. Journal of Health Communication, 16(7), 686–697. doi:  10.1080/10810730.2011.551997
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551997 [Google Scholar]
  27. Howard, F. M.
    (2009) Endometriosis and mechanisms of pelvic pain. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 16(5), 540–550. doi:  10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.017 [Google Scholar]
  28. IASP International Association for the Study of Pain
    IASP International Association for the Study of Pain (2017) Terminology. Retrieved fromhttps://www.iasp-pain.org/terminology?navItemNumber=576#Pain
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Koller, V.
    (2010) Lesbian nation: A case of multiple interdiscursivity. InR. de Cillia, H. Gruber, F. Menz & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Discourse, politics, identity (pp.369–381). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lascaratou, C.
    (2007) The language of pain: Expression or description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, F.
    (2018) Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics5(2), 1–14. doi:  10.1186/s40554‑018‑0054‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0054-z [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, J. R.
    (2004) Sense and sensibility: Texturing evaluation. InJ. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp.270–304). New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martucci, K. T., & Mackey, S. C.
    (2018) Neuroimaging of pain: Human evidence and clinical relevance of central nervous system processes and modulation. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 128(6), 1241–1254. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002137
    https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002137 [Google Scholar]
  35. Morotti, M., Vincent, K., & Becker, C. M.
    (2016) Mechanisms of pain in endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, 209, 8–13. doi:  10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.497
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.497 [Google Scholar]
  36. Musolff, A.
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nicholson, B.
    (2006) Differential diagnosis: Nociceptive and neuropathic pain. The American Journal of Managed Care, 12(9 Suppl.), 256–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Overend, A.
    (2014) Haunting and the ghostly matters of undefined illness. Social Theory and the Body, 12(1), 63–83. 10.1057/sth.2013.20
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.20 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  40. Preece, J.
    (1999) Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting With Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 12, 63–77. 10.1016/S0953‑5438(98)00056‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00056-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ricoeur, P.
    (1988) Time and narrative, Volume3. Translated byK. Blamey & D. Pellauer. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ritchie, L. D.
    (2010) “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 123–143. doi:  10.1080/10926488.2010.489383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.489383 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schott, G. D.
    (2004) Communicating the experience of pain: The role of analogy. Pain, 108, 209–12. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.037
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.037 [Google Scholar]
  44. Seear, K.
    (2009) The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1220–1227. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.023 [Google Scholar]
  45. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2010) Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor & Symbol, 25(4), 205–226. doi:  10.1080/10926488.2010.510926
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.510926 [Google Scholar]
  47. Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J.
    (2013) Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization, Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59. doi:  10.1080/10926488.2013.742842
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742842 [Google Scholar]
  48. Steen, G.
    (2008) When is metaphor deliberate?InN. L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival. Stockholm Studies in English (pp.43–64). Retrieved fromhttps://www.english.su.se/about-us/events/the-stockholm-metaphor-festival/previous-metaphor-festivals/selected-papers-from-the-2008-stockholm-metaphor-festival-1.71576
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wright, K. O.
    (2018) ‘You have endometriosis’: Making menstruation-related pain legitimate in a biomedical world. Health Communication, 1–4. doi:  10.1080/10410236.2018.1440504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1440504 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zinken, J.
    (2003) Ideological imagination: Intertextual and correlational metaphors in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 14(4), 507–523. doi:  10.1177/0957926503014004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004005 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): blending; endometriosis; intertextuality; metaphor; pain
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error