1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.19021.har
2021-09-08
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alger, C.
    (2006) ‘What went well, what didn’t go so well’: Growth of reflection in pre-service teachers. Reflective Practice, 7(3), 287–301. 10.1080/14623940600837327
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940600837327 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S.
    (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.00995.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B.
    (1993) Bias, prevalence and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(5), 423–429. 10.1016/0895‑4356(93)90018‑V
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-V [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, D. D.
    (2003) A classification system for metaphors about teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(2), 24–31. 10.1080/07303084.2003.10608375
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2003.10608375 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, G., Faris, P., Hemmelgarn, B., Walker, R. L., & Quan, H.
    (2009) Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 5. doi:  10.1186/1471‑2288‑9‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, H. S., Watson, A. B., & Bakerson, M.
    (2015) Crowdchecking conceptual metaphors. InW. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp.139–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.3.06dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.06dav [Google Scholar]
  7. Dweck, C. S.
    (2008) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Flanagan, J. C.
    (1935) Factor analysis in the study of personality. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Flusberg, S. J., & Hard, B. M.
    (2019) Metaphors we teach by: A method for mapping metaphorical lay theories. InA. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freksa (Eds), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp.316–322). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbs, R. W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K.
    (1999) The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York: William Morrow & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grice, J. W.
    (2001) Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 430–450. 10.1037/1082‑989X.6.4.430
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gurney, B. F.
    (1995) Tugboats and tennis games: Preservice conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 569–583. 10.1002/tea.3660320605
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320605 [Google Scholar]
  14. Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W.
    (2006) The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psych, 33(2), 84–91. 10.1207/s15328023top3302_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Keysar, B., & Bly, B.
    (1995) Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans?Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89–109. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1005
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Landau, M. J., Oyserman, D., Keefer, L. A., & Smith, G. C.
    (2014) The college journey and academic engagement: How metaphor use enhances identity-based motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 679–698. 10.1037/a0036414
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036414 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C.
    (2007) Factor analysis in personality research. InR. W. Robins, C. Fraley, and R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, New York: Guilford Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Low, G. D.
    (2008) Metaphor and education. InR. W. Gibbs, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.212–231). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.014 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2015) A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. InW. Wan & G. D. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp.15–37). 10.1075/milcc.3.01low
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.01low [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahlios, M., Massengill-Shaw, D., & Barry, A.
    (2010) Making sense of teaching through metaphors: a review across three studies. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 49–71. 10.1080/13540600903475645
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903475645 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martıńez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L.
    (2001) Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher education, 17(8), 965–977. 10.1016/S0742‑051X(01)00043‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy, G. L.
    (1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, 173–204. 10.1016/0010‑0277(96)00711‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Perkins, K. M., Toskos Dils, A., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2020) The perceived threat of demographic shifts depends on how you think the economy works. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1368430220951621. 10.1177/1368430220951621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220951621 [Google Scholar]
  26. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A.
    (2007) Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 123–139. doi:  10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z.
    (2009) Gaining insights into teachers’ ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323–335. doi:  10.1080/03055690802648135
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648135 [Google Scholar]
  28. Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J.
    (2015) Methodological approaches and strategies for elicited metaphor-based research. InW. Wan & G. D. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp.39–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.3.02seu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.02seu [Google Scholar]
  29. Shaw, D. M., Barry, A., & Mahlios, M.
    (2008) Preservice teachers’ metaphors of teaching in relation to literacy beliefs. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 35–50. 10.1080/13540600701837632
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701837632 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sim, J., & Wright, C. C.
    (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257–268. 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.3.257 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N.
    (2018) To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mindsets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. 10.1177/0956797617739704
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704 [Google Scholar]
  32. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS one, 6(2), e16782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS one, 8(1), e52961. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
  34. Thibodeau, P. H., Crow, L., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2017) The metaphor police: A case study of the role of metaphor in explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1375–1386. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1192‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1192-5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Thibodeau, P. H., Matlock, T., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2019) The role of metaphor in communication and thought. Language & Linguistics Compass, 13(5), 1–18. 10.1111/lnc3.12327
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12327 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tobin, K.
    (1990) Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching?Theory into Practice, 29(2), 122–127. 10.1080/00405849009543442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543442 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wan, W., Low, G. D., & Li, M.
    (2011) From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403–415. 10.1016/j.system.2011.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  38. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S.
    (2012) Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 [Google Scholar]
  39. Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., … Dweck, C. S.
    (2019) A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. 10.1038/s41586‑019‑1466‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.19021.har
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.19021.har
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): concepts; lay theories; metaphors; teaching
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error