1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews MetaNet

 
978 90 272 6340 7978 90 272 6341 4

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.19024.mcg
2020-05-01
2020-09-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M.
    (2007) Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1160, 69–81. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C.
    (2017) A neurocomputational model of the n400 and the p600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 41, 1318–1352. 10.1111/cogs.12461
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carston, R.
    (2012) Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. InK. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp.469–492). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139022453.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.025 [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldman, J.
    (2006) From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Tendahl, M.
    (2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21(3), 379–403. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Gutiérrez, E. D., Shutova, E., Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K.
    (2016) Literal and metaphorical senses in compositional distributional semantic models. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/P16‑1018
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1018 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lai, V. T., & Curran, T.
    (2013) ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and Language, 127, 484–496. 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A.
    (2013) Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353. 10.1162/COLI_a_00124
    https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00124 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012) A deflationary account of metaphors. InD. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp.97–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.19024.mcg
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error