Review of Perrez, Reuchamps & Thibodeau (2019): Variations in Political Metaphor

References

1. Billig, M., & Macmillan, K.
   (2005) Metaphor, Idiom and Ideology: The Search for ‘No Smoking Guns’ across Time. Discourse and Society, 16(4), 459–480. 10.1177/0957926505053050
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053050 [Google Scholar]
2. Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J.
   (2017) The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(2), 118–134. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623 [Google Scholar]
3. Cameron, L., & Low, G.
   (2004) Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 355–373. 10.1080/1382557042000277430
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277430 [Google Scholar]
4. Drulák, P.
   (2006) Motion, Container and Equilibrium: Metaphors in the Discourse about European Integration. European Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 499–531. 10.1177/1354066106069322
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106069322 [Google Scholar]
5. Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H.
   (2017) Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11, 769–783. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 [Google Scholar]
6. Lakoff, G.
   (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Musolff, A.
   (2016) Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourses and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Steen, G. J.
   (2015) Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
9. Steen, G. J.
   (2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. 10.1515/ip‑2017‑0001
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, K., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
11. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS ONE, 6(2), e167182. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
12. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
13. Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2017) How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 852–863. 10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]