1887
image of Uncovering the structure of metaphorical lay theories of teaching II
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Metaphor plays a critical role in how people communicate and conceptualize complex activities like teaching. For example, a professor might be described as (), or (). Prior research has largely focused on what metaphors like these communicate about the role of teachers, but many teaching metaphors simultaneously describe the role of students (e.g., ). We aimed to extend previous work with a recently developed method for mapping the structure of metaphorical concepts to examine the metaphorical entailments associated with students, rather than teachers. We presented participants recruited online with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship and found that different metaphors consistently bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of student attributes and different intuitions about teacher and student responsibility and power – a finding we replicated with a larger sample and pre-registered analysis. Together with previous findings, this research suggests that teaching metaphors can efficiently capture and communicate structured beliefs about both teacher and student attributes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.21008.har
2022-04-21
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S.
    (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child development, 78(1), 246–263. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.00995.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D.
    (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high- quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. 10.1177/1745691610393980
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 [Google Scholar]
  3. Casasanto, D.
    (2008) similarity and Proximity: When Does Close in space mean Close in mind?Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056. 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1047 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, D. D.
    (2003) A Classification System for Metaphors about Teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(2), 24–31. 10.1080/07303084.2003.10608375
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2003.10608375 [Google Scholar]
  5. Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2017) Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs Jr., R. W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hard, B. M., Liang, N., Wong, M., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2021) Metaphors we teach by: Uncovering the structure of metaphorical lay theories of teaching. Metaphor and the social world, 46–70. 10.1075/msw.19021.har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19021.har [Google Scholar]
  8. Keysar, B., & Bly, B.
    (1995) Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans?Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89–109. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1005
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T.
    (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0727‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z [Google Scholar]
  12. Low, G.
    (2015) A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse, 15–37. 10.1075/milcc.3.01low
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.01low [Google Scholar]
  13. Martı́nez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L.
    (2001) Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher education, 17(8), 965–977. 10.1016/S0742‑051X(01)00043‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9 [Google Scholar]
  14. Murphy, G. L.
    (1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 173–204. 10.1016/0010‑0277(96)00711‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Perkins, K. M., Toskos Dils, A., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2022) The perceived threat of demographic shifts depends on how you think the economy works. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 227–246. 10.1177/1368430220951621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220951621 [Google Scholar]
  16. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A.
    (2007) Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 123–139. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaw, D. M., Barry, A., & Mahlios, M.
    (2008) Preservice teachers’ metaphors of teaching in relation to literacy beliefs. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 35–50. 10.1080/13540600701837632
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701837632 [Google Scholar]
  18. Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z.
    (2009) Gaining insights into teachers’ ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323–335. 10.1080/03055690802648135
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648135 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N.
    (2018) To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. 10.1177/0956797617739704
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704 [Google Scholar]
  20. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS one, 6(2), e16782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS one, 8(1), e52961. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
  22. Thibodeau, P. H., Crow, L., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2017) The metaphor police: A case study of the role of metaphor in explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1375–1386. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1192‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1192-5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Thibodeau, P. H., Matlock, T., & Flusberg, S. J.
    (2019) The role of metaphor in communication and thought. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(5), e12327. 10.1111/lnc3.12327
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12327 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tobin, K.
    (1990) Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching?. Theory into practice, 29(2), 122–127. 10.1080/00405849009543442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543442 [Google Scholar]
  25. Watson, P.
    (2020, June23). Teaching isn’t for Rock stars. RetrievedJanuary 29, 2021, fromhttps://medium.com/@patrickdkwatson/teaching-isnt-for-rock-stars-a7703fabb0f4
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.21008.har
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.21008.har
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: concepts ; students ; metaphors ; lay theories ; teaching
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error