1887
image of Review of Di Biase-Dyson & Egg (2020): Drawing Attention to Metaphor
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this online first article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.22011.mue
2022-07-26
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cameron, L.
    (1999) Operationalizing ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. InL. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp.3–28). Cambridge University Press. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cienki, A.
    (1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. InJ.-P. Koenig (Ed.). Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp.189–204). Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2008) Why study metaphor and gesture?InA. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.) Metaphor and gesture (pp.5–25). John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  4. (2017) Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.131–147). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Egg, M.
    (2016) Spatial metaphor in the Pauline epistles. InF. Horn & C. Breytenbach (Eds.), Spatial metaphors. Texts and transformations (pp.77–99). Edition Topoi.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2011) Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrmann, J. B.
    (2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive presentations (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). LOT.
  8. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Müller, C.
    (2008) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T. & Reijnierse, W. G.
    (2019) Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nisbet, R.
    (1982) Prejudices: A philosophical dictionary. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Reijnierse, W. G.
    (2017) The value of deliberate metaphor (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). LOT.
  13. Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C. H., Krennmayr, T., Steen, G. J.
    (2018) DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 129–147. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schklowski, V.
    (1971) Kunst als Verfahren. InJ. Streidter (Ed.) Russischer Formalismus. Texte zur allgemeinen Literaturtheorie und zur Theory der Prosa. (pp.3–35). Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Steen, G.
    (2011a) From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 21, 83–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2011b) What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness and actions. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  17. Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & âsma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification (converging evidence in language and communication research 14). John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wallington, A. M., J. A. Barnden, M. A. Barnden, F. J. Ferguson & S. F. Glasbey
    (2003) Metaphoricity signals: A corpus-based investigation. Cognitive science research papers. www.cs.bham.ac.uk/%7Ejab/ATT-meta/papers/CSRP-03-05.Pdf (accessed8 April 2022).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.22011.mue
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error