1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

When metaphors appear in a text in clusters within the same source domain, they are usually referred to as an extended metaphor (Gibbs, 2015; Naciscione, 2016; Semino, 2008; Shutova, 2015; Thibodeau, 2016; Werth, 1994). This creates a coherent narrative or a scenario (Musolff, 2016) encoding the evaluation of a particular socially-contested issue. The present study analyses how the evaluation of higher education reform in Lithuanian media is manifested through extended metaphor and whether negative evaluations prevail. For this investigation, a corpus of Lithuanian media texts on higher education reform was examined within the frameworks of Critical Metaphor Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2014) and scenarios (Musolff, 2016). The findings show that, when extended metaphors are ascribed positive, negative or mixed values and categorised into mini-narratives, leitmotif narratives and long narratives, they usually (24 out of 28) follow negatively and often death-related and ironically encoded narratives with differently twisted scenarios. This study, therefore, shows a persistent attempt by the media to evaluate the ongoing reform negatively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.22022.cib
2023-05-30
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 15min_1 Dideli premjero užmojai: aukštojo mokslo ir esminė mokesčių reformos – jau kitąmet
    15min_1 Dideli premjero užmojai: aukštojo mokslo ir esminė mokesčių reformos – jau kitąmet (20–12–2017) https://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/lietuva/dideli-premjero-uzmojai-aukstojo-mokslo-ir-esmine-mokesciu-reformos-jau-kitamet-56-900180?copied
  2. 15 min_2 Aukštasis mokslas, arba Kieno ausys ilgiausios?
  3. 15min_3 Artėjant mūšiui Seime dėl aukštojo mokslo Lietuvoje
  4. 15min_4 „Fake law“ invazija universitetuose
  5. TV3_1 Ministrė apie universitetų pertvarką: siūlėme vykti greitkeliu, pasirinktas plentas
    TV3_1 Ministrė apie universitetų pertvarką: siūlėme vykti greitkeliu, pasirinktas plentas (24–06–2017) https://www.tv3.lt/naujiena/lietuva/ministre-apie-universitetu-pertvarka-siuleme-vykti-greitkeliu-pasirinktas-plentas-n915352
  6. TV3_2 Stabdo masinio stojimo į universitetus madą: net mokant pinigus, bus sunkiau gauti diplomą
    TV3_2 Stabdo masinio stojimo į universitetus madą: net mokant pinigus, bus sunkiau gauti diplomą (14–05–2017) https://www.tv3.lt/naujiena/lietuva/stabdo-masinio-stojimo-i-universitetus-mada-net-mokant-pinigus-bus-sunkiau-gauti-diploma-n910432
  7. LR_1 Lietuvos aukštojo mokslo laidotuvės – mokslininkai uždirba kaip vairuotojai
    LR_1 Lietuvos aukštojo mokslo laidotuvės – mokslininkai uždirba kaip vairuotojai (11–12–2017) https://www.lrytas.lt/lietuvosdiena/aktualijos/2017/12/11/news/lietuvos-aukstojo-mokslo-laidotuves-mokslininkai-uzdirba-kaip-vairuotojai-3846904
  8. Ahrens, K., & Jiang, M.
    (2020) Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(1), 43–55. 10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bednarek, M.
    (2006) Evaluation in media discourse. Analysis of a newspaper corpus. Research in Corpus and Discourse. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bednarek, M., & Caple, H.
    (2012/2019) News discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogetic, K.
    (2019) Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change. Analysing social meanings of metaphor in public discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(1), 1–31. 10.1075/msw.17013.bog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17013.bog [Google Scholar]
  12. Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G.
    (2016) Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, irony. Communication Theory, 261, 410–430. 10.1111/comt.12096
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Low, G.
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. Metaphor analysis. Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the Humanities (pp.116–146). Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2014) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coll-Florit, M., & Climent, S.
    (2019) A new methodology for conceptual metaphor detection and formulation in corpora: A case study on a mental health corpus. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 321, 43–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Crisp, P.
    (2005) Allegory and symbol – a fundamental opposition?Language and Literature, 14(4), 323–338. 10.1177/0963947005051287
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005051287 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deignan, A.
    (2017) From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.102–116). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Entman, R.
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Fogarty, B. J.
    (2005) Determining economic news coverage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(2), 149–172. 10.1093/ijpor/edh051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh051 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuoli, M.
    (2018) A stepwise method for annotating APPRAISAL. Functions of Language, 25(2), 229–58. 10.1075/fol.15016.fuo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15016.fuo [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuoli, M., Littlemore, J., & Turner, S.
    (2021) Sunken ships and screaming banshees: metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language and Linguistics, 26(1), 75–103. 10.1017/S1360674321000046
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000046 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibbs, R.
    (2015) The allegorical character of political metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 264–281. 10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib [Google Scholar]
  23. (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (in press). ‘Pushing Britain off the precipice’: A CDA approach to negative evaluative stance in opinion articles on Brexit. InJ. Marín-Arrese, L. Hidalgo-Downing & J. R. Zamorano Mansilla Eds. Stance (inter)subjectivity and identity in discourse. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2022) Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk. 10.1515/text‑2021‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0096 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunston, S.
    (2011) Corpus approaches to evaluation, phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Koller, V.
    (2003) Metaphor clusters in business media discourse: a social cognition approach [Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna]. University of Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kövecses, Z.
    (2021) A multilevel and contextualist view of conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of Language and Communication, 8(2), 133–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Littlemore, J.
    (2019) Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241441
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441 [Google Scholar]
  30. Littlemore, J., & Turner, S.
    (2022, April21–22). Creative metaphor, emotion and evaluation in conversations about work [Paper presentation]. Figurative Thought and Language Conference, Poznan, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen and Alfonso Sánchez-Moya
    (in press). ‘Histrionic, appalling, a major turkey’: The expression of evaluative stance in the discourse of online forums’. InJ. Marín-Arrese, L. Hidalgo-Downing & J. R. Zamorano Eds. Stance, inter/subjectivity and identity in discourse. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, J., & White, P. R. R.
    (2005) The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  33. MESS
    MESS 2018Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Lithuaniahttps://www.smm.lt/uploads/documents/Svietimo%20reformos%20pristatymas.pdf [Accessed18 June 2019].
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Naciscione, A.
    (2016) Extended metaphor in the web of discourse. InR. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphors (pp.241–266). John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.6.12nac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.12nac [Google Scholar]
  36. Paulauskas, J.
    (2015) Sisteminis lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Systemic Dictionary of Lithuanian]. Mokslas. www.lkiis.lki.lt
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Reinierse, G.
    (2021, February8). Introducing MSDIP: A method for coding source domains in metaphor analysis [Webinar paper]. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reijnierse, G.
    (2021, February8). Introducing MSDIP: A method for coding source domains in metaphor analysis [paper presentation]. Joint online seminar by Department of English and Research Centre for English Communication, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. https://www.polyu.edu.hk/engl/rcpce/?p=197
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Shutova, E.
    (2015) Design and evaluation of metaphor processing systems. Computational Linguistics. 41(4), 579–623. 10.1162/COLI_a_00233
    https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00233 [Google Scholar]
  41. Soroka, S.
    (2006) Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385. 10.1111/j.1468‑2508.2006.00413.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T.
    (2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thibodeau, P.
    (2016) Extended metaphors are the home runs of persuasion: Don’t fumble the phrase. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 53–72. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1150756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150756 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson, G., Hunston, S.
    (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. InS. Hunston & G. Thomson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp.1–27). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Trussler, M., & Soroka, S.
    (2014) Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 360–379. 10.1177/1940161214524832
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214524832 [Google Scholar]
  46. Urbonaitė, J., Šeškauskienė, I., & Cibulskienė, J.
    (2019) Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. InS. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages. MIPVU around the world (pp.159–181). John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.22.08urb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.08urb [Google Scholar]
  47. Werth, P.
    (1994) Extended metaphor – a text-world account. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 3(2), 79–103. 10.1177/096394709400300201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709400300201 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.22022.cib
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.22022.cib
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evaluation; extended metaphor; framing; higher education reform; narrative
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error