1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Incels, or involuntary celibates, are a community of typically heterosexual young men who wish to, but do not, have sexual and romantic relationships with women. As a community, they have previously been characterised by their hatred for women and violent acts against members of society who they believe prevent them from having relations with women. In this paper, we highlight the pervasiveness of metaphor in incel communication, so far unaddressed in the budding studies of incel language. Specifically, using a sample of circa 22,500 words from the banned incel Reddit forum r/Braincels, we focus on how members of this community use metaphoric expressions to dehumanise gendered social actors, both as individuals and as groups. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of metaphor approaches to language, gender, and sexuality, and the relevance of dehumanising metaphorical rhetoric for online misogynist groups.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.23005.bog
2023-05-26
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, A.
    (2001) On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual metaphors: Case studies and proposed methodology. InM. Pütz (Ed.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp.117–146). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110866254.117
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866254.117 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bogetić, K.
    (2019) Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change: Analyzing social meanings of metaphor in public discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(1), 1–31. 10.1075/msw.17013.bog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17013.bog [Google Scholar]
  3. (2022) Race and the language of incels: Figurative neologisms in an emerging English cryptolect. English Today, 1–11. 10.1017/S0266078422000153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078422000153 [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender, and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 199–216. 10.1080/10926488.2012.665796
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665796 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cottee, S.
    (2020) Incel (E)motives: Resentment, Shame and Revenge. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(2), 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S.
    (2019) In other words: ‘The language of attraction’ used by pick-up artists. English Today, 35(2), 13–19. 10.1017/S026607841800007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841800007X [Google Scholar]
  8. Denes, A.
    (2011) Biology as consent: Problematizing the scientific approach to seducing women’s bodies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(5), 411–419. 10.1016/j.wsif.2011.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H.
    (2019) Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit. WebSci ’19 Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 87–96. 10.1145/3292522.3326045
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326045 [Google Scholar]
  10. García, M. J. H.
    (2021) It all comes down to sex: Metaphorical animalisation in reggaeton discourse. InCrespo-Fernández, E. (Ed.), Discourse studies in public communication (pp.152–176). Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.92.07gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.92.07gar [Google Scholar]
  11. Ging, D.
    (2019) Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. 10.1177/1097184X17706401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Sun, P.
    (2011) Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(3), 311–325. 10.1177/0261927X11407168
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11407168 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hegstrom, J. L., & McCarl-Nielsen, J.
    (2002) Gender and metaphor: Descriptions of familiar persons. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 219–234. 10.1207/S15326950DP3303_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, F., & Koller, V.
    (2020) Incels, in-groups, and ideologies: The representation of gendered social actors in a sexuality-based online community. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(2), 152–178. 10.1075/jls.19014.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19014.her [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E.
    (2020) Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaki, S., De Smedt, T., Gwóźdź, M., Panchal, R., Rossa, A., & De Pauw, G.
    (2019) Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7(2), 240–268. 10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimmel, M.
    (2013) Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era. Hachette Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koller, V.
    (2004) Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230511286
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2022) Words and worlds of desire: The power of metaphor in framing sexuality. InGrayling, A. C., & Wuppuluri, S. (Eds.), Metaphors and analogies in sciences and humanities: Words and worlds (pp.363–382). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑90688‑7_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90688-7_18 [Google Scholar]
  20. Koller, V., & Ryan, J.
    (2019) A nation divided: Metaphors and scenarios in media coverage of the 2016 British EU referendum. InC. Hart (Ed.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to text and discourse: From poetics to politics (pp.131–156). Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474450003‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474450003-010 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kövecses, Z.
    (2008) Universality and Variation in the Use of Metaphor. InN.-L. Johannesson and D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp.51–74). Department of English, Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics28(2), 321–347. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052 [Google Scholar]
  23. Krendel, A.
    (2020) The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607–630. 10.1177/0957926520939690
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520939690 [Google Scholar]
  24. Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V.
    (2022) The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321. 10.3366/cor.2022.0257
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0257 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Leyens, J. P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., ... & Vaes, J.
    (2003) Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703–717. 10.1002/ejsp.170
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.170 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lilly, M.
    (2016) ‘The World is Not a Safe Place for Men’: The Representational Politics of The Manosphere [Doctoral dissertation], University of Ottawa.
  29. López-Maestre, M. D.
    (2015) ‘Man the hunter’: A critical reading of hunt-based conceptual metaphors of love and sexual desire. Journal of Literary Semantics, 44(2), 89–113. 10.1515/jls‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
  30. López Rodríguez, I.
    (2009) Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, lenguaje y representación: revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 7(1), 77–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Marwick, A. E., and Caplan, R.
    (2018) Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 [Google Scholar]
  32. McHugh, M. L.
    (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276–282. 10.11613/BM.2012.031
    https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031 [Google Scholar]
  33. Motschenbacher, H.
    (2011) Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2121, 149–179. 10.1515/ijsl.2011.050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.050 [Google Scholar]
  34. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2015) Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 41–56. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
  37. Prażmo, E.
    (2020) Foids are worse than animals: A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 21(2), 16–27. 10.2478/topling‑2020‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2020-0007 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2022) In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse. Language and Dialogue, 12(3), 383–406. 10.1075/ld.00119.pra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00119.pra [Google Scholar]
  39. Scotto di Carlo, G.
    (2023) An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 3–21. 10.1177/09579265221099380
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221099380 [Google Scholar]
  40. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J.
    (2018) An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stefanowitsch, A., & Goschler, J.
    (2009) Sex differences in the usage of spatial metaphors: A case study of political language. InAhrens, K. (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp.166–183). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230245235_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235_8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor, C.
    (2018) Representing the Windrush generation: metaphor in discourses then and now. Critical Discourse Studies17(1), 1–21. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1554535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1554535 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tipler, C. N. & Ruscher, J. B.
    (2019) Dehumanizing representations of women: the shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 109–118. 10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790 [Google Scholar]
  45. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2008) Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Valkenburgh, S. P.
    (2018) Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. 10.1177/1097184X18816118
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18816118 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wright, D.
    (2020) The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 361, 100402. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.23005.bog
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dehumanising metaphors; gender and sexuality; incels; online community; social actors
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error