1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Metaphor has increasingly been recognized as an effective investigative tool, especially in educational research, because it allows for insight into implicit beliefs, values and assumptions about the world around us. This article discusses methodological issues involved in ‘getting at’ students’ metaphors, the first step in metaphor analysis in educational research. Our focus is on techniques of eliciting metaphor, where respondents are overtly prompted to produce a metaphor about a particular issue. We discuss different elicitation techniques in four studies: study 1 without any scaffolding, just a prompt for eliciting metaphor; study 2 with minimal scaffolding in the form of a definition of metaphor and illustrative examples; study 3 with a brief classroom intervention before elicitation; and study 4 with a longer intervention over an entire semester. We gained the most thorough results in study 4, which also arguably provided the most valuable learning experience for the respondents. This came at a price however — a great investment of time over the course of a semester. In the event that no classroom time may be set aside for work with metaphor, the non-interventional approach of study 2 offers an acceptable alternative. Even a few explanatory lines about metaphor prove helpful in eliciting metaphor.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
2024-10-21
2025-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bager-Elsborg, A., & Greve, L.
    (2017) Establishing a method for analysing metaphors in higher education teaching: A case from business management teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1–14. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1327945
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1327945 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cibulskienė, J.
    (2021, 23–26June). Spatial metaphors and attitudinal perspective in a learning process: Learning languages is like… [Paper presentation]. RaAM 14, Vilnius, Lithuania. raam14.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Jurga-Cibulskiene.mp4
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L.
    (1999) Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. InL. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp.149–176). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.011 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2020) Elicited metaphor analysis: Researching teaching and learning. InM. R. M. Ward & S. Delamont (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education. (pp.488–505). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781788977159.00054
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977159.00054 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cömert, P. N., & Gürol, T. D.
    (2023) Understanding unconscious thoughts of the self: Imaginative metaphor elicitation technique in qualitative research. Yıldız Social Science Review, 9(2), 64–72. 10.51803/yssr.1383290
     https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1383290 [Google Scholar]
  6. Creed, A., & Nacey, S.
    (2021) Qualitative and quantitative examination of metaphorical language use in career-life preparedness. InW. Murphy & J. Tosti-Kharas (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Careers (pp.283–298). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781788976725.00023
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976725.00023 [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, H. S.
    (2009) Student and teacher conceptualizations of reading: A metaphor analysis study of scripted reading interventions in secondary classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1240938743
  8. Deng, Y., Yang, J., & Wan, W.
    (2021) Embodied metaphor in communication about lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. PLOS One, 16(12), e0261968–e0261968. 10.1371/journal.pone.0261968
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261968 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hart, G.
    (2009) Composing metaphors: Metaphors for writing in the composition classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ohiou1240682599&disposition=inline
  10. (2015) Beyond ‘elicit and run’ metaphor research: Why conversations within and between levels of participants matter. InW. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse (pp.265–288). John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.3.11har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.11har [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, J., & Zou, W.
    (2022) A study of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching via metaphor analysis in a Chinese context. Journal of Education for Teaching JET, 48(5), 508–520. 10.1080/02607476.2021.1989287
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1989287 [Google Scholar]
  12. Low, G.
    (2015) A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. InW. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse (pp.15–37). John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.3.01low
     https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.3.01low [Google Scholar]
  13. McGrath, I.
    (2006) Using insights from teachers’ metaphors. Journal of Education for Teaching: JET, 32(3), 303–317. 10.1080/02607470600782443
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470600782443 [Google Scholar]
  14. Nacey, S.
    (2020) Figurative production in a computer-mediated discussion forum: Metaphors about relationship abuse. InA. Gargett & J. Barnden (Eds.), Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, Experimental and Practical Perspectives (pp.363–388). John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.10.13nac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.10.13nac [Google Scholar]
  15. (2022) Systematic Metaphors in Norwegian Doctoral Dissertation Acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 679–694. 10.1080/00313831.2022.2042847
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042847 [Google Scholar]
  16. Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J.
    (2018) DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics (2), 129–147. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0026‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Saban, A.
    (2010) Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and teacher education, 26(2), 290–305. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M.
    (2013) Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. Research Policy, 42(1), 273–286. 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Strugielska, A.
    (2008) Coherence Relations and Concept Dynamic in Learners’ Personal Theories. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics (5), 107–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Woodside, A. G.
    (2004) Advancing from subjective to confirmatory personal introspection in consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 21(12), 987–1010. 10.1002/mar.20034
     https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20034 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) Using the forced metaphor-elicitation technique (FMET) to meet animal companions within self. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 480–487. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.029
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.029 [Google Scholar]
  22. Wan, W.
    (2011) An examination of the validity of metaphor analysis studies: Problems with metaphor elicitation techniques. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 261–287. 10.1075/msw.1.2.07wan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.07wan [Google Scholar]
  23. (2012) Using metaphorical conceptualisation to construct and develop ESL students’ writing: An exploratory study [Doctoral dissertation, University of York]. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2746/
  24. Wan, W., Low, G. D., & Li, M.
    (2011) From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403–415. 10.1016/j.system.2011.07.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  25. Zaltman, G.
    (1997) Rethinking market research: Putting people back in. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 424–437. 10.1177/002224379703400402
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400402 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zaltman, G., & Coulter, R. H.
    (1995) Seeing the voice of the customer — metaphor-based advertising research. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 35–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M.
    (2007) Preservice and Inservice Instructors’ Metaphorical Constructions of Second Language Teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 521–534. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2007.tb02873.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02873.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
Loading
Comparing metaphor elicitation models
Metaphor and the Social World 14, 258 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): English language learning; Finland; learner English; metaphor elicitation; Norway

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error