1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The climate battle in America
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

Metaphorical frames are commonly used in public discourse in the United States of America to communicate about climate change and promote climate action. Previous work found climate metaphors to resonate more so with Democrats than with Republicans. Democrats are also more likely to increase their support for climate action. The present study investigated if tailoring climate metaphors to conservatives’ affective domain and personality traits may trigger metaphor realisation. It experimentally tested, for the first time, if a frame for climate change which better fits with conservatives’ worldview, can induce fear and anger, and if these emotions alongside personality trait aggressiveness predict increasing support for climate action in both liberal ( = 63) and conservative ( = 63) respondents. The findings showed that the frame induced fear in both groups, especially among Republicans, but not anger, and that it directly impacted climate attitudes, primarily among Democrats. Trait aggressiveness predicted lower support for climate action at baseline but did not predict attitudinal changes. These novel findings show conservatives are not climate apathetic and encourage further research into how the fear triggered by climate metaphors can be channelled into attitudinal changes in climate inactive populations.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
2025-04-14
2025-04-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/msw.24015.gae/msw.24015.gae.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., & Konijn, E. A.
    (2021) When Figurative Frames Decrease Political Persuasion: The Case of Right-Wing Anti-Immigration Rhetoric. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1851121
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1851121 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J.
    (2017) Recategorizing political frames: A systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, (), –. 10.1080/23808985.2017.1312481
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1312481 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Vis, B.
    (2019) Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/langcog.2019.5
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bush, G. W.
    (2006, January31). State of the Union: The Advanced Energy Initiative. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060131-6.html
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M.
    (1992) The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.63.3.452
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, G. L.
    (2003) Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.85.5.808
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cottraux, J., Bouvard, M., & Messy, P.
    (1987) Validation and factor analysis of a phobia scale. The French version of the Marks-Mathews fear questionnaire. L’Encephale, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Croissant, Y., & Millo, G.
    (2008) Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package. Journal of Statistical Software, (), Article 1. 10.18637/jss.v027.i02
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2018) Panel data econometrics with R (First edition). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119504641
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119504641 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crystal, D.
    (2007) The Fight for English: How Language Pundits Ate, Shot, and Left. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=5745831
     [Google Scholar]
  11. DeNicola, E., & Subramaniam, P. R.
    (2014) Environmental attitudes and political partisanship. Public Health, (), –. 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  12. Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C.
    (2019) The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, (), –. 10.1038/s41558‑018‑0360‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A.
    (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BF03193146
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 [Google Scholar]
  14. Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
    (2013) The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes. Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/0956797612449177
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177 [Google Scholar]
  15. Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2017) Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flusberg, S. J., & Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2023) Why Is Mother Earth on Life Support? Metaphors in Environmental Discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1111/tops.12651
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12651 [Google Scholar]
  17. Funk, C., & Kennedy, B.
    (2020) How Americans see climate change and the environment in 7 charts. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/21/how-americans-see-climate-change-and-the-environment-in-7-charts/
  18. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2013) Metaphoric cognition as social activity. Metaphor & the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.3.1.03gib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  19. Gubler, J. R., & Kalmoe, N. P.
    (2015) Violent Rhetoric in Protracted Group Conflicts: Experimental Evidence from Israel and India. Political Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.1177/1065912915608947
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915608947 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hajjar, S. T.
    (2018) Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hlavac, M.
    (2018) stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables (v5.2.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Johansson Falck, M.
    (2018) From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically?Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-147070. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G.
    (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, (), Article 10. 10.1038/nclimate1547
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalmoe, N. P.
    (2013) From Fistfights to Firefights: Trait Aggression and Support for State Violence. Political Behavior, (), –. 10.1007/s11109‑012‑9195‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9195-z [Google Scholar]
  25. (2014) Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence. Political Communication, (), –. 10.1080/10584609.2013.852642
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852642 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2015) Trait aggression in two representative U.S. surveys: Testing the generalizability of college samples. Aggressive Behavior, (), –. 10.1002/ab.21547
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21547 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2019) Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors. Political Science Research and Methods, (), –. 10.1017/psrm.2017.36
     https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.36 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalmoe, N. P., Gubler, J. R., & Wood, D. A.
    (2018) Toward Conflict or Compromise? How Violent Metaphors Polarize Partisan Issue Attitudes. Political Communication, (), –. 10.1080/10584609.2017.1341965
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1341965 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kennedy, B.
    (2020, April16). U.S. concern about climate change is rising, but mainly among Democrats. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/04/16/u-s-concern-about-climate-change-is-rising-but-mainly-among-democrats/
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kennedy, B., & Johnson, C.
    (2020) More Americans see climate change as a priority, but Democrats are much more concerned than Republicans. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/28/more-americans-see-climatechange-as-a-priority-but-democrats-are-much-more-concerned-than-republicans
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kitching, N.
    (2021, October8). Just like smokers, fossil-fuel addicts are going to need help to quit — Neil Kitching. The Scotsman. https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/just-like-smokers-fossil-fuel-addicts-need-help-to-quit-neil-kitching-3410608
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kraska-MIller, M.
    (2013) Nonparametric Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences (0 ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/b16188
     https://doi.org/10.1201/b16188 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lakey, H.
    (2013) Morphosyntax of Fear and Distance. Indo-European Linguistics, (), –. 10.1163/22125892‑00101004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-00101004 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) The Grammar of Fear: Morphosyntactic Metaphor in Fear Constructions. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/20415
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lakoff
    Lakoff (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InMetaphor and thought, 2nd ed (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z.
    (2006) Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, (), –. 10.1002/bdm.515
     https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.515 [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, X. S.
    (2013) Statistical Power Analysis for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Basic and Advanced Techniques. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203127698
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203127698 [Google Scholar]
  38. Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Vraga, E., Bloodhart, B., Stenhouse, N., & Leiserowitz, A.
    (2013) A national survey of Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents on energy and climate change.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M.
    (1979) Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, (), –. 10.1016/0005‑7967(79)90041‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(79)90041-X [Google Scholar]
  40. Okonski, L., & Ferreira, L. C.
    (2019) Gonna be on my fucking period in boomtown, souuuunndd thanks Mother Nature: Using Twitter to find multimodal creativity and embodied instant metaphors. Signo, (), –. urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-166556. 10.17058/signo.v44i79.12851
     https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v44i79.12851 [Google Scholar]
  41. Okonski, L., Martinez-Cruz, A. L., & Gaele, C.
    (2025) Conservatives for energy freedom: Subjective responses to ecological frames predict subsequent pro-environmental attitudes. [Manuscript in preparation]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S.
    (2009) “Fear Won’t Do It”: Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations. Science Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1075547008329201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201 [Google Scholar]
  43. Plantin, C.
    (2019) Tense Arguments. Informal Logic, (), –. 10.22329/il.v39i4.6043
     https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i4.6043 [Google Scholar]
  44. Prolific
    Prolific (2021) Prolific. https://www.prolific.co
  45. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.4). https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Raimi, K. T., Stern, P. C., & Maki, A.
    (2017) The Promise and Limitations of Using Analogies to Improve Decision-Relevant Understanding of Climate Change. PLOS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0171130
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171130 [Google Scholar]
  47. Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J.
    (2015) How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not): The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.5.2.04rei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.04rei [Google Scholar]
  48. Reser, J. P., & Bradley, G. L.
    (2017) Fear Appeals in Climate Change Communication. InJ. P. Reser & G. L. Bradley, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.386
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.386 [Google Scholar]
  49. Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C.
    (2014) When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLOS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0113536
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113536 [Google Scholar]
  50. Stoet, G.
    (2010) PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2017) PsyToolkit: A Novel Web-Based Method for Running Online Questionnaires and Reaction-Time Experiments. Teaching of Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/0098628316677643
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2011) Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLOS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tremblay, P. F., & Ewart, L. A.
    (2005) The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences, (), –. 10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  54. Trump, D. J.
    (Director) (2016, June28). Donald Trump Remarks in Monessen, Pennsylvania (411870–1) [Speech]. InRoad to the White House 2016. C-SPAN. https://www.c-span.org/video/?411870-1/donald-trump-delivers-remarks-us-economy
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J., & Sherman, D. K.
    (2018) Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/1745691617748966
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617748966 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T., Miller, E., Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D., Spinu, V., … Yutani, H.
    (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.01686
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wirz, D. S.
    (2018) Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication. International Journal of Communication, (), Article 0. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7846
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Zuuren, F. J. V.
    (1988) The Fear Questionnaire: Some Data on Validity, Reliability and Layout. The British Journal of Psychiatry, (), –. 10.1192/bjp.153.5.659
     https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.153.5.659 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
Loading
The climate battle in America
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24015.gae
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: trait aggressiveness ; fear ; climate change ; metaphor ; metaphorical framing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error