1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 16, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The metaphorical representation of discourse about social unrest is omnipresent. Elemental metaphors are extensively employed by news articles and media channels to depict social crises and difficult circumstances. This research focuses on social unrest discourse because this field of research has been universally recognized as inherently metaphorical (Lakoff, 2002). In particular, it thus studies experimental methods for analyzing metaphorical framing effects and functions of elemental metaphors in social unrest discourse. The results of the experiment show subtle lexico-grammatical differences in metaphorical framing analysis created a significant impact of how the reader construed the same material situation in alternative ways. In both experiments, we studied the role of metaphor in shaping reasoning about the complex societal problem of social unrest. We found that metaphors influence people’s reasoning by instantiating frame-consistent knowledge structures and inviting structurally consistent inferences. Overall, this research highlights how metaphors guide complex reasoning and underscores the value of integrating experimental methods with metaphor analysis in discourse-analytical studies.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24027.che
2025-07-14
2026-04-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.24027.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benjamin, D. J. S. A., & Smith, M. L.
    (2017) The Republican and Independent Minds: The Role of Cognitive Processes in Political Ideology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 233–250.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boroditsky, L.
    (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00073‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 [Google Scholar]
  3. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2006) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑50170‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-50170-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2011) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2017) Fire metaphors: Discourses of awe and authority. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781474219556
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219556 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chilton, P.
    (2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, A. W.
    (2025) Fire, water, Gaia, and Zephyrus: A cognitive, corpus-based metaphorical analysis on elemental metaphors of social unrest. Manuscript under review.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D.
    (2015) Metaphorical accounting: How framing the federal budget like a household’s affects voting. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 1078–1099. 10.1111/cogs.12475
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12475 [Google Scholar]
  10. Christmann, U., & Göhring, A.-L.
    (2016) A German-language replication study analysing the role of figurative speech in reasoning. Scientific Data, 31, 160098. 10.1038/sdata.2016.98
     https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.98 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diamond, J.
    (2020) The framing effect and decision-making: Insights from behavioral science. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 25(4), 342–359.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fausey, C. M., & Matlock, T.
    (2011) Can grammar win elections?Political Psychology, 32(4), 563–574. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2010.00802.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00802.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2017) The role of climate change discourse in political polarization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 501, 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Geise, S., & Baden, C.
    (2014) The role of discourse domains in framing: An analysis of media coverage. Discourse & Society, 25(1), 5–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L.
    (2008) The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 64–75. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
    (2015) The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77. 10.1177/0146167214557006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214557006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendricks, J., Smith, A. B., & Lee, C. M.
    (2018) Sickness and cancer: The impact of emotional responses on health behaviors. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(4), 555–570.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jia, L., & Smith, E. R.
    (2013) Distance makes the metaphor grow stronger: A psychological distance model of metaphor use. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 492–497. 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Keefer, L. A., Landau, M. J., & Sullivan, D.
    (2011) Exploring metaphor’s epistemic function: Uncertainty moderates metaphor-consistent priming effects on social perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 659–662. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980). 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471006.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471006.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2002) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books. https://george-lakoff.com/books/philosophy-in-the-flesh/
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J.
    (2009) Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421–1426. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02462.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02462.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Landau, M.  J., Keefer, L.  A., & Rothschild, Z.  K.
    (2014) Epistemic motives moderate the effect of metaphoric framing on attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 531, 125–138. 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lau, R. R., & Schlesinger, M.
    (2005) Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77–113. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2005.00410.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00410.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Leiner, D. J.
    (2019) Variables and their impact on research methodology. Journal of Research Methods, 15(2), 123–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Merriam–Webster
    Merriam–Webster (2023) — Merriam–Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed.). Merriam–Webster, Inc.https://www.merriam-webster.com
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McGuire, W.  J.
    (2000) Standing on the shoulders of ancients: Consumer research, persuasion, and figurative language. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 109–114. 10.1086/314312
     https://doi.org/10.1086/314312 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nicaise, G.
    (2014) Metaphor and communication: An analytical perspective. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 20(2), 55–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ottati, V., Rhoads, S., & Graesser, A. C.
    (1999) The effect of metaphor on processing style in a persuasion task: A motivational resonance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 688–697. 10.1037/0022‑3514.77.4.688
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.688 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ottolina, S., Malandri, L., Pianta, E., & Tonelli, S.
    (2021) Leveraging temporal and static word embeddings for metaphor detection. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03320
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Pinker, S.
    (2007) The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking/Penguin. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/54799/the-stuff-of-thought-by-steven-pinker/9780141015477
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E.
    (2000) The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 30(1), 57–86. 10.1207/S15326950DP3001_03
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3001_03 [Google Scholar]
  38. Reijnierse, J.
    (2015) Metaphor in modern discourse. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 28(3), 212–230.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sanchez-Bayona, A., & Agerri, R.
    (2024) Meta4XNLI: A dataset for cross-lingual metaphor detection and interpretation in Spanish and English. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07053
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P.
    (2002) The impact of metaphor on persuasion. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 301–320.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Steen, G.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. 10.1080/10926480802426753
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  43. Steen, G.  J., Dorst, A.  G., Herrmann, J.  B., Kaal, A.  A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, Vol.141). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14
  44. Stowe, K., Palmer, A., & Kiperwasser, E.
    (2021) Generating metaphoric paraphrases with conceptual mappings [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01228
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2016) The influence of metaphor on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 661, 55–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Thibodeau, P.  H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2011) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e16782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2013) Metaphors influence moral judgment. Cognition, 126(1), 55–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J.
    (2013) Social beliefs and media influence: An experimental study. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 224–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Stee, S.
    (2018) Metaphor and meaning: An analytical approach. Journal of Linguistic Research, 22(1), 45–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, H., Runtsova, T., & Chen, H.
    (2013) Economy is an organism: A comparative study of metaphor in English and Russian economic discourse. Text & Talk, 33(2), 259–288. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0012 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.-B.
    (2000) Emotive responses to media messages. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 147–170.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24027.che
Loading
Press, police, and protest
Metaphor and the Social World 16, 24 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24027.che
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24027.che
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24027.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive linguistics; corpus linguistics; experimental research; metaphor; social unrest

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error