Creative visual and multimodal metonymy in non-commercial advertisements on substance use

References

1. Barcelona, A.
   (2003) The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing. Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. InK. U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.81–122). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.07bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.07bar [Google Scholar]
2. Brdar-Szabó, R. and Brdar, M.
   (2022) Metonymy in multimodal discourse, or: How metonymies get piggybacked across modalities by other metonymies and metaphors. InA. Bagasheva, B. Hristov & N. Tincheva (Eds.) Figurativity and Human Ecology (pp.209–249). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.17.09brd
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.17.09brd [Google Scholar]
3. Carter, R.
   (2004) The Art of English. Everyday Creativity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Colston, H. L. & C. Rasse
   (2022) Figurativity: Cognitive, because it’s social. InH. L. Colston, T. Matlock & G. J. Steen (Eds.) Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond (pp.243–264). John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.9.13col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.13col [Google Scholar]
5. Feng, W. D.
   (2017) Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication, 16(4), 441–466.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Forceville, C.
   (2009) Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. InE. Ventola & J. A. Moya (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp.56–74). Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
   (1994) The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
   (1999) Speaking and thinking with metonymy. InK. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.61–76). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.04gib
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.04gib [Google Scholar]
9. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Colston, H. L.
   (2012) Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
10. Goessens, L.
    (1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–342. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
11. Herrero Ruiz, J.
    (2006) The Role of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Conceptual Blending in Understanding Advertisements: The Case of Drug-prevention Ads. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 191, 169–190. 10.14198/raei.2006.19.10
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2006.19.10 [Google Scholar]
12. Herrero Ruiz, J.
    (2018) Exaggerating and mitigating through metonymy: The case of situational and cause for effect/effect for cause metonymies. Language and Communication, 62(Part A), 51–65. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Hidalgo-Downing, L. and B. Kraljevic Mujic
    (2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid [Google Scholar]
14. Hidalgo-Downing, L. and N. A. O’Dowd
    (2023) Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(3), 231–253. 10.1080/10926488.2022.2153336
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2153336 [Google Scholar]
15. Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen
    (2006) Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. Abingdon: Routledge. (second edition). 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
16. Kashanizadeh, Z. & Forceville, C.
    (2020) Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy: a study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 78–110. 10.1075/cogls.00050.kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00050.kas [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Littlemore, J.
    (2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
19. Littlemore, J.
    (2017) On the role of embodied cognition in the understanding and use of metonymy. InB. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.160–178). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.010 [Google Scholar]
20. Littlemore, J.
    (2022) On the creative use of metonymy. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 104–129. 10.1075/rcl.00103.lit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00103.lit [Google Scholar]
21. Littlemore, J. & Tagg, C.
    (2018) Metonymy and text messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 481–507. 10.1093/applin/amw018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw018 [Google Scholar]
22. Littlemore, J. & Turner, S.
    (2020) Metaphors in communication about pregnancy loss, Metaphor and the Social World, 10(1), 45–75. 10.1075/msw.18030.lit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18030.lit [Google Scholar]
23. Mittelberg, I., Waugh, L. R.
    (2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. InC. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp.329–356). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110215366.5.329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.5.329 [Google Scholar]
24. Moya Guijarro, J. A.
    (2013) Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 336–352. 10.1075/rcl.11.2.08moy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.08moy [Google Scholar]
25. Moya Guijarro, J. A. & B. Ruiz Cordero
    (2020) A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 372–396. 10.1075/rcl.00064.moy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00064.moy [Google Scholar]
26. Negro Alousque, I.
    (2013) Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 261, 365–384.
    [Google Scholar]
27. O’Dowd, N.
    (2024) The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse and Society, advanced online publication. 10.1177/09579265231222005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231222005 [Google Scholar]
28. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2016a) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A corpus-based account. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 73–90. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759 [Google Scholar]
29. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2016b) “Shockvertising”: Conceptual interaction patterns as constraints on advertising creativity. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 651, 257–290. 10.5209/rev_CLAC.2016.v65.51988
    https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2016.v65.51988 [Google Scholar]
30. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
31. Pérez Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., Ford, S.
    (2021) Unpacking creativity: The power of figurative communication in advertising. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108562409
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108562409 [Google Scholar]
32. Pérez-Sobrino, P., Semino, E., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Koller, V., Olza, I.
    (2022) Acting like a hedgehog in times of pandemic: Metaphorical creativity in the #reframecovid collection. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 127–139. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1949599
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1949599 [Google Scholar]
33. Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z.
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. InK. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17–59). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
34. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2021) Conceptual Metonymy Theory revisited: some definitional and taxonomic issues. InX. Wen & J. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.204–227). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-15 [Google Scholar]
35. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., Diéz Velasco, O.
    (2009) Patterns of conceptual interaction. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.489–532). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.4.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.4.489 [Google Scholar]
36. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S. & Rayson, P.
    (2018) Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315629834Šorm
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629834Šorm [Google Scholar]
37. Urios-Aparisi, E.
    (2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp.95–118). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110215366.2.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.95 [Google Scholar]
38. Yeager, K.
    (2009) Alcohol and Drug Use Problems. Oxford bibliographies (online). [accessed1 September 2024] 10.1093/obo/9780195389678‑0039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389678-0039 [Google Scholar]
39. World Health Organization
    World Health Organization (2024) Global status report on alcohol and health and treatment of substance use disorders. [electronic version, accessed29/102014]
    [Google Scholar]