1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 15, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Metonymy has traditionally been studied as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon closely linked to metaphor. Nevertheless, the connection between metaphor and metonymy requires further exploration. This special issue examines the embodied, social, and creative dimensions of metonymy, emphasizing its role in authentic language use and multimodal contexts. The contributions provide different scholarly and empirical perspectives drawing on naturalistic data from diverse genres and modalities, including spoken interaction, fiction, advertising, and corpus data. By focusing on metonymy and how it is used across different types of naturalistic data, we aim to facilitate a discussion about the various dimensions relevant to comprehending the full complexity of metonymy and its relationship to metaphor. Together, these articles demonstrate that metonymy is not merely a referential tool, but rather a flexible, embodied, and socially grounded mechanism for meaning making across various contexts, providing shortcuts to shared encyclopedic knowledge and social meaning, and as such deserving more attention in studies of figurative language.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24034.joh
2025-09-19
2026-07-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.24034.joh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/msw.24034.joh.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24034.joh&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barcelona, A.
    (2003a) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. De Gruyter, Inc.. 10.1515/9783110894677
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2003b) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.31–58). De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783110894677.31
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.31 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, L. J.
    (2007) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & society, 18(2), 197–222. 10.1177/0957926507073376
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, M.
    (2008–) Corpus of Concentemporary American English. Ininto.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dirven, R.
    (2002) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization [1993]. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.75–112). De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783110219197.75
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.75 [Google Scholar]
  6. Downing, L. H., & Mujic, B. K.
    (2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid [Google Scholar]
  7. El Refaie, E.
    (2013) Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors: Breaking out of conceptual prisons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 236–249. 10.1075/rcl.11.2.02elr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.02elr [Google Scholar]
  8. (2019) Visual metaphor and embodiment in graphic illness narratives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, R.
    (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (2022) Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings?Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 7–32. 10.1075/rcl.00099.gib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00099.gib [Google Scholar]
  11. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California, Berkeley.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Jensen, T. W.
    (2022) The indexical affordance of metaphor: stain as a case example. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(3), 208–228. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1973869
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1973869 [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson Falck, M.
    (2018) From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically?Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 61–84. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2024) Lexico-Encyclopedic Conceptual (LEC) Metaphors. InT. L. Fuyin (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Semantics (Vol.31, pp.289–311). Brill. 10.1163/2773‑1952_HCSO_COM_0311
     https://doi.org/10.1163/2773-1952_HCSO_COM_0311 [Google Scholar]
  15. Johansson Falck, M., & Gibbs, R.
    (2012) Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 251–272. 10.1515/cog‑2012‑0008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0008 [Google Scholar]
  16. Johansson Falck, M., & Okonski, L.
    (2022) Procedure for identifying metaphorical scenes (PIMS): A Cognitive Linguistics approach to bridge theory and practice. Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 294–322. 10.1163/23526416‑bja10031
     https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10031 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2023) Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): The Case of Spatial and Abstract Relations. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(1), 1–22. 10.1080/10926488.2022.2062243
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2062243 [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980/2008) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Littlemore, J.
    (2015) Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Metaphors in the Mind : Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor (First edition. ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241441
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441 [Google Scholar]
  23. Littlemore, J., & Tagg, C.
    (2018) Metonymy and text messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 481–507. 10.1093/applin/amw018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw018 [Google Scholar]
  24. Panther, K.-U., & Thornberg, L.
    (2002) The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English –er nominals. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp.279–320). De Gruyter, Inc.. 10.1515/9783110219197.279
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.279 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pérez Sobrino, P.
    (2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L.
    (2001) Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language & Communication, 21(4), 321–357. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(01)00008‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00008-8 [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor, J. R.
    (2004) Linguistic categorization. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Zbikowsi, L. M.
    (2020) Music, metaphor, and creativity. InL. Hidalgo-Downing & B. Kraljevic Mujic (Eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts (pp.43–69). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.7.03zbi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.03zbi [Google Scholar]
  29. Zinken, J.
    (2007) Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 445–466. 10.1515/COG.2007.024
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.024 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.24034.joh
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
Keyword(s): corpus and discourse data; metaphor and metonymy interaction; multimodal metonymy; naturalistic data; visualizations

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error