1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Ecology, responsibility, and moral accounting
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the use of the term (‘footprint’, ‘trace’) in Polish online press, particularly in equivalents of footprint metaphors (e.g., ). It aims to identify the broader frames and contexts in which these metaphors appear and the framing of responsible entities. Previous studies highlight how terms like the often attribute environmental impact to individual actions. This study confirms this trend in contexts like weight-based footprints and travel, but also finds that in the frame of resource use, products and processes are construed as responsible. Researchers of metaphors in science claim that environmental metaphors shape moral judgments and this study explores how metaphorical footprints and traces relate to morality and responsibility in Polish online press. Using examples from four press outlets, the study demonstrates the evaluative role of metaphorical footprints and traces, and their use in moral accounting.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
2025-11-25
2025-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Augé, A.
    (2022) How visual metaphors can contradict verbal occurrences: A cross-linguistic and multimodal analysis of the imprint of climate change. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.20001.aug
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20001.aug [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett, J.
    (2001) Component ecological footprint: Developing sustainable scenarios. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, (), –. 10.3152/147154601781767069
     https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781767069 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bieńkowska, Z., Drygas, P., & Sadura, P.
    (2021) Nie nasza wina, nie nasz problem. Katastrofa klimatyczna w oczach Polek i Polaków. Fundacja im. Heinricha Bölla. https://pl.boell.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/nie%20nasza%20wina.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bińczyk, E.
    (2018) Epoka człowieka: Retoryka i marazm antropocenu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BP
    BP (2006) Carbon footprint calculator. Environment and Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bralczyk, J., Sobol, E., Drabik, L., Kłosińska, A., Kubiak-Sokół, A., Stankiewicz, A., Szewczyk, M., & Wiśniakowska, L.
    (2005) Słownik Języka Polskiego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. https://sjp.pwn.pl/
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron, L.
    (2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. InM. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. do C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.173.04cam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173.04cam [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R.
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. InL. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.–). Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  10. Doyle, J.
    (2011) Where has all the oil gone? BP branding and the discursive elimination of climate change risk. InN. Heffernan & D. A. Wragg (Eds.), Culture, environment and ecopolitics (pp.–). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiedorczuk, J., & Beltrán, G.
    (2020) Ekopoetyka / Ecopoética / Ecopoetics. Muzeum Historii Polskiego Ruchu Ludowego.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, (), –. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Girvan, A.
    (2019) Carbon footprints as cultural-ecological metaphors. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goatly, A.
    (2007) Washing the brain — metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/dapsac.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoekstra, A. Y., & Chapagain, A. K.
    (2007) Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management, (), –. 10.1007/s11269‑006‑9039‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimmel, M.
    (2012) Optimizing the analysis of metaphor in discourse: How to make the most of qualitative software and find a good research design. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.10.1.01kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.10.1.01kim [Google Scholar]
  18. Kissinger, M., & Gottlieb, D.
    (2010) Place oriented ecological footprint analysis — The case of Israel’s grain supply. Ecological Economics, (), –. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  19. Konieczny, P., Mroczek, E., & Kucharska, M.
    (2013) Ślad węglowy w zrównoważonym łańcuchu żywnościowym i jego znaczenie dla konsumenta żywności. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kövecses, Z.
    (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lakoff, G.
    (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524030903529749
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2016) Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (Third edition). The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226411323.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226411323.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to the western thought. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Langacker, R. W.
    (1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Larson, B.
    (2011) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt5vm557
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vm557 [Google Scholar]
  26. LDCE
    LDCE. (n.d.). Footprint. InLongman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. RetrievedSeptember 12, 2025, fromhttps://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/footprint
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Marhula, J., & Rosiński, M.
    (2019) Linguistic metaphor identification in Polish. InS. Nacey, L. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages. MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.22.09mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.09mar [Google Scholar]
  28. Mateja, D.
    (2024) Zmiany klimatu w dyskursie „Gazety Wyborczej” i „Rzeczpospolitej” w latach 2015–2022: Ujęcie korpusowe. Prace Językoznawcze, (), –. 10.31648/pj.10347
     https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.10347 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nerlich, B., Evans, V., & Koteyko, N.
    (2011) Low carbon diet: Reducing the complexities of climate change to human scale. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1515/langcog.2011.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2011.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I.
    (2014) The greenhouse metaphor and the footprint metaphor. TATuP — Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, (), –. 10.14512/tatup.23.2.27
     https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.23.2.27 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N.
    (2009a) Carbon reduction activism in the UK: Lexical creativity and lexical framing in the context of climate change. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524030902928793
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902928793 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2009b) Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of ‘carbon indulgences.’ Global Environmental Change, (), –. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2010) Carbon gold rush and carbon cowboys: A new chapter in green mythology?Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524030903522389
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903522389 [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Toole, O.
    (2023) The generation that blocks the streets!’ A critical discourse analysis of language against climate activism in Poland’s right-wing. InM. Błaszkowska-Nawrocka, M. Różalska, & A. Treska-Siwoń (Eds.), INDIVISIBLE. Social responsibility in the age of entropocene (pp.–). AT Wydawnictwo.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Peters, G. P.
    (2010) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, (), –. 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  36. Polish Web Corpus 2019
    Polish Web Corpus 2019 (2024) RetrievedSeptember 8, 2025, fromhttps://www.sketchengine.eu
  37. Rees, W. E.
    (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, (), –. 10.1177/095624789200400212
     https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212 [Google Scholar]
  38. (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment, (), –. 10.1007/BF02208489
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208489 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rees, W. E., & Wackernagel, M.
    (1996) Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable — And why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (), –. 10.1016/S0195‑9255(96)00022‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rivers, N. A.
    (2018) Better footprints. InB. McGreavy, J. Wells, Jr. McHendry, George F., & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑65711‑0_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65711-0_7 [Google Scholar]
  41. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Steciąg, M.
    (2010) Environmental discourse in public debates in Poland: Relativization, exclusion and acceptance. Language and Ecology, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2012) Dyskurs ekologiczny w debacie publicznej. Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (2023) Język w epoce antropocenu: Ujęcie ekolingwistyczne. Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  46. Swacha, P.
    (2023) Parlamentarne partie polityczne w Polsce wobec problemu zmiany klimatu w latach 2005–2019 (perspektywa sieci społecznych). Studia Politologiczne, (), –. 10.33896/SPolit.2023.69.13
     https://doi.org/10.33896/SPolit.2023.69.13 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E.
    (1995) Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J.
    (2007) A definition of “carbon footprint.” InC. C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological economics research trends (pp.–). Nova Science Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. World Resources Institute
    World Resources Institute (2001) Calculator. SafeClimate. https://web.archive.org/web/20010709234601/www.safeclimate.net/calculator/
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wright, L. A., Kemp, S., & Williams, I.
    (2011) ‘Carbon footprinting’: Towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, (), –. 10.4155/cmt.10.39
     https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.39 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zawisławska, M.
    (2011) Metafora w języku nauki. Na przykładzie nauk przyrodniczych. Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
Loading
Ecology, responsibility, and moral accounting
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25016.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: environmental discourse ; framing ; feedback metaphors ; ecological footprint ; Polish press ; carbon footprint ; moral accounting ; cognitive frame

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error