1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of ‘Climate cults’ and ‘climate sins’
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Climate change is frequently discussed by political figures and journalists that have divergent views on the validity of climate change; metaphor is often used to frame climate change and portray a particular stance on the issue. Religion metaphors used to invalidate the veracity of climate change have been documented in the United Kingdom and the United States (Atanasova & Koteyko, 2017; Woods et al., 2012), however, our data indicates that specific Religion metaphors are also used to validate climate change. We address: (1) Which Religion metaphors are used to frame climate change as a valid issue, or as a fraudulent secular ‘religion’; (2) How these metaphors instantiate a specific ideological stance; (3) Patterns of metaphor use by climate change skeptics and climate change advocates. Our findings show that different Religion metaphors are used to frame climate change by conservatives and liberals in the United States and Canada. Through our analysis, we clarify how the Religion frame is used to make divergent arguments concerning climate change.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
2025-11-25
2025-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/msw.25017.gro/msw.25017.gro.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderagg, W., & Blanchard, L.
    (2024) Climate-targets group should rescind its endorsement of carbon offsets. Nature, , . 10.1038/d41586‑024‑01271‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01271-6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, C., & Stephenson, L.
    (2011) Environmentalism and party support in Canada: Recent trends outside Quebec. Canadian Journal of Political Science, (), –. 10.1017/S0008423911000138
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423911000138 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N.
    (2017) Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705 [Google Scholar]
  4. Augé, A.
    (2023) Metaphor and argumentation in climate crisis discourse. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003342908
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342908 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2024) Are religion metaphors anti-revolutionary? Metaphors of climate scepticism in France. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.23017.aug
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23017.aug [Google Scholar]
  6. Azzi, S., Clarkson, S., McCall, C., Smyth, J. & McIntosh, A.
    (2025) Liberal Party of Canada. The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/liberal-party
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bean, L.
    (2014) The politics of evangelical identity: Local churches and partisan divides in the United States and Canada. Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. & Steen, G.
    (2017) The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boulianne, S. & Belland, S.
    (2022) Climate denial in Canada and the United States. Canadian Review of Sociology, (), –. 10.1111/cars.12388
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12388 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J.
    (2016) Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, (), –. 10.1111/comt.12096
     https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpenter, W.
    (2021) Woke religion: Unmasking the false gospel of social justice. Emerald House.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2006) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave-MacMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cibulskienė, J.
    (2023) Scepticism voiced through extended metaphors: Assessment of higher education reform in the media. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.22022.cib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.22022.cib [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A.
    (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, (), 024024. 10.1088/1748‑9326/8/2/024024
     https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dancygier, B.
    (2016) Figurativeness, conceptual metaphor and blending. InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2023) Multimodal media: Framing climate change. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456231154724
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231154724 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
    (2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar: A case study of metaphors in the gun debate. Constructions and Frames, (), –. 10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav [Google Scholar]
  19. Dow Jones
    Dow Jones n.d. News & Insights Glossary: Factiva. https://www.dowjones.com/professional/glossary/factiva/
     [Google Scholar]
  20. El Refaie, E.
    (2005) ‘Our purebred ethnic compatriots’: Irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  21. Entman, R.
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Fauconnier, G.
    (1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Feldman, L., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A.
    (2011) Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, (), –. 10.1177/1940161211425410
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilens, M., & Murakawa, N.
    (2002) Elite cues and political decision making. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Goatly, A.
    (2007) Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldstein, J.
    (2018) Planetary improvement: Cleantech entrepreneurship and the contradictions of green capitalism. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
    (1999) Blending and metaphor. InR. Gibbs & G. Steen, (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
  29. Hart, C.
    (2008) Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1080/17405900801990058
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hick, J.
    (1998) Is Christianity the only true religion?Theology, (), –. 10.1177/0040571X9810100502
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X9810100502 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoffman, A. J.
    (2011) The growing climate divide. Nature Climate Change, (), –. 10.1038/nclimate1144
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1144 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hughes, S., Anderson, A., & Golden, S.
    (2001) Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance?Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, (), –. 10.1016/S0278‑4254(01)00031‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnston, Richard
    (2017) The Canadian party system. University of British Columbia Press. 10.59962/9780774836098
     https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774836098 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kihara, Y.
    (2005) The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.513
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.513 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195145113.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195145113.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kreuz, R. J.
    (1996) The use of verbal irony: cues and constraints. InJ. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kyyrö, J., Äystö, T., & Hjelm, T.
    (2023) “The cult of Greta Thunberg”: De-legitimating climate activism with “religion”. Critical Research on Religion, (), –. 10.1177/20503032231174208
     https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032231174208 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lachapelle, E., Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. G.
    (2012) Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States compared. Review of Policy Research, (), –. 10.1111/j.1541‑1338.2012.00563.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00563.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Langacker, R.
    (1991) Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. LexisNexis
    LexisNexis. (n.d.). Nexis Uni® for Academic Research. https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/professional/academic/nexis-uni.page
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Longman’s Dictionary of Contemporary English Online
    Longman’s Dictionary of Contemporary English Online (n.d.). Longman’s Dictionary of Contemporary English. https://www.ldoceonline.com
     [Google Scholar]
  43. McCright, A., Marquart-Pyatt, S., Shwom, R., Brechin, S., & Allen, S.
    (2016) Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, , –. 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  44. Media Bias/ Fact Check
    Media Bias/ Fact Check. (n.d.). Media Bias: Journalism Bias. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore, J. W.
    (2016) Introduction. InJ. W. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism (pp.–). PM Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. (2022) Fake conspiracy: Trump’s anti-Chinese ‘COVID-19-as-war’ scenario. InD. Massimiliano, V. Zorzi, & A. Zottola (Eds.), Conspiracy theory discourses (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus [Google Scholar]
  48. Nerlich, B.
    (2010) “Climategate”: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, (), –. 10.3197/096327110X531543
     https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X531543 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N.
    (2009) Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of ‘carbon indulgences’. Global Environmental Change, (), –. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Oakley, T. & Pascual, E.
    (2017) Conceptual blending theory. InB. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.027
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.027 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schafraad, P., Wester, F., & Scheepers, P.
    (2006) Using ‘new’ data sources for ‘old’ newspaper research: Developing guidelines for data collection. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, (), –. 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.029
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.029 [Google Scholar]
  52. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Seymour, N.
    (2018) Bad environmentalism: Irony and irreverence in the ecological age. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctv65sz3q
     https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv65sz3q [Google Scholar]
  54. Shingler, B.
    (2024, March24). What’s behind the carbon tax, and does it work?CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/climate/carbon-tax-controversy-1.7151551
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, G. A.
    (2021, December14). About three-in-ten U.S. adults are now religiously unaffiliated. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/12/14/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-are-now-religiously-unaffiliated/
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Statistics Canada
    Statistics Canada (2022, October10). The Canadian census: A rich portrait of the country’s religious and ethnocultural diversity. The Daily. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/221026/dq221026b-eng.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Steen, G., Dorst, L., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sullivan, K.
    (2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sweetser, E., David, O., and Stickles, E.
    (2019) MetaNet: Automated metaphor identification across languages and domains. InM. Bolognesi, M. Brdar, & K. Š. Despot (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.8.02swe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.8.02swe [Google Scholar]
  60. Tobin, V., & Israel, M.
    (2012) Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. InE. Sweetser & B. Dancygier (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.004 [Google Scholar]
  61. Veldman, R. G.
    (2019) The gospel of climate skepticism: Why evangelical Christians oppose action on climate change. University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Whitman, J., Zhao, J., Roberts, K., & Todd, R.
    (2018) Political orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change. Climate Change, , –. 10.1007/s10584‑018‑2147‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2147-9 [Google Scholar]
  63. Woods, R., Fernández, A., & Coen, S.
    (2012) The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change. Public Understanding of Science, (), –. 10.1177/0963662510385061
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510385061 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
Loading
‘Climate cults’ and ‘climate sins’
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25017.gro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: ideology ; metaphor ; climate change ; politics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error