1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Like a coin spinning in the air
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

The complexity of the science underlying quantum technology may pose a barrier to its democratization. This study investigated whether metaphors improve comprehension of, and shape attitudes toward, quantum technology. Specifically, we examined effects on perceived comprehension of a newspaper article about a new quantum computer, actual comprehension of underlying quantum phenomena (superposition and entanglement), and affect- and cognition-based attitudes. In an online experiment ( = 1,167 participants representative of the Dutch population), participants read a news article that included a metaphorical, non-metaphorical, or no explanation of a quantum phenomenon. Both explanation types reduced perceived comprehension of the news article compared to the control group, but increased actual comprehension of the quantum phenomenon. No direct effects were found on affect-based or cognition-based attitudes. Mediation analyses revealed a very small negative indirect effect of explanations on attitudes, through lower perceived comprehension, and a very small positive indirect effect of explanations on attitudes via increased actual comprehension — though the latter was counteracted by a negative direct effect. As metaphors offered no additional benefit over non-metaphorical explanations, the findings suggest they do not provide a communicative advantage for enhancing understanding or shaping attitudes in this context.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
2026-01-29
2026-02-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/msw.25018.mei/msw.25018.mei.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Akin, H., Cacciatore, M. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A.
    (2021) Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, (), –. 10.1093/ijpor/edaa010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa010 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M.
    (1991) Domain Knowledge and Analogic Reasoning Ability as Predictors of Expository Text Comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, (), –. 10.1080/10862969109547735
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547735 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beger, A., & Smith, T. H.
    (Eds) (2020) How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.6 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernholt, S., Härtig, H., & Retelsdorf, J.
    (2023) Reproduction Rather than Comprehension? Analysis of Gains in Students’ Science Text Comprehension. Research in Science Education, (), –. 10.1007/s11165‑022‑10066‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10066-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bornman, N.
    (2021, December7). Quantum entanglement: What it is, and why physicists want to harness it. The Conversation. 10.64628/AAJ.myxs7kc64
     https://doi.org/10.64628/AAJ.myxs7kc64 [Google Scholar]
  6. Braasch, J. L. G., & Goldman, S. R.
    (2010) The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638530903420960
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903420960 [Google Scholar]
  7. Busby, A., Digby, A., & Fu, E.
    (2017) Quantum Technologies, Public Dialogue Report (p.). Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [ESPRC].
     [Google Scholar]
  8. CBS
    CBS (2024) Bevolking; kerncijfers. Available at: www.cbs.nl
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobb, M. D., & Macoubrie, J.
    (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, (), –. 10.1007/s11051‑004‑3394‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coenen, C., Grinbaum, A., Grunwald, A., Milburn, C., & Vermaas, P.
    (2022) Quantum Technologies and Society: Towards a Different Spin. NanoEthics, (), –. 10.1007/s11569‑021‑00409‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00409-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, H. J., Ordóñez, G., & Porter, A.
    (2010) Emerging Technologies: Quantitative Identification and Measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, (), –. 10.1080/09537321003647396
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09537321003647396 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Jong, E.
    (2025) Functional Understanding of Quantum Technology Is Essential yo the Ethical Debate About Its Impact. arXiv.Org.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T.
    (2011) Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies. Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01562.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x [Google Scholar]
  14. European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication
    European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication (2021) Special Eurobarometer 516: European citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards science and technology version (v1.00).
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Feynman, R.
    (1967) The Character of Physical Law. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, M. F. J., Zwickl, B. M., & Lewandowski, H. J.
    (2020) Preparing for the Quantum Revolution: What is the Role of Higher Education?Physical Review Physics Education Research, (), 020131. 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020131
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020131 [Google Scholar]
  17. Glynn, S. M., & Takahashi, T.
    (1998) Learning from Analogy-Enhanced Science Text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (), –. 10.1002/(SICI)1098‑2736(199812)35:10<1129::AID‑TEA5>3.0.CO;2‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10<1129::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grinbaum, A.
    (2017) Narratives of Quantum Theory in the Age of Quantum Technologies. Ethics and Information Technology, (), –. 10.1007/s10676‑017‑9424‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9424-6 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilkamo, O., & Granqvist, N.
    (2022) Giving Sense to Market Categories: Analogies and Metaphors in the Early Emergence of Quantum Computing. InC. Lockwood & J.-F. Soublière (Eds), Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship (Vol., pp.–). Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S0733‑558X20220000080005
     https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000080005 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaeger, A. J., & Wiley, J.
    (2015) Reading an Analogy Can Cause the Illusion of Comprehension. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1026679
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1026679 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kurath, M., & Gisler, P.
    (2009) Informing, Involving or Engaging? Science Communication, in the Ages of Atom-, Bio- and Nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, (), –. 10.1177/0963662509104723
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509104723 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, (), –. 10.2307/2025464
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 [Google Scholar]
  23. Meem, F. N., Smith, J., & Johnson, B.
    (2024) Challenges and Opportunities for Survey Research in the Age of Generative AI: An Experience Report. 2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), –. 10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00066
     https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00066 [Google Scholar]
  24. Meinsma, A. L., Kristensen, S. W., Reijnierse, W. G., Smeets, I., & Cramer, J.
    (2023) Is Everything Quantum ‘Spooky and Weird’? An Exploration of Popular Communication about Quantum Science and Technology in TEDx Talks. Quantum Science and Technology, (), 035004. 10.1088/2058‑9565/acc968
     https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/acc968 [Google Scholar]
  25. Meinsma, A. L., Rothe, T., Reijnierse, W. G., Smeets, I., & Cramer, J.
    (2025) Quantum in the Media: A Content Analysis of Dutch Newspapers. Science Communication, 10755470251318300. 10.1177/10755470251318300
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251318300 [Google Scholar]
  26. Miele, D. B., & Molden, D. C.
    (2010) Naive Theories of Intelligence and the Role of Processing Fluency in Perceived Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), –. 10.1037/a0019745
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019745 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mooney, C.
    (2010) Do Scientists Understand the Public?American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. NOS
    NOS (2024, October23). Nederland krijgt een van acht grote Europese quantumcomputers. https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2541877-nederland-krijgt-een-van-acht-grote-europese-quantumcomputers
     [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Keefe, D. J., & Hoeken, H.
    (2021) Message Design Choices Don’t Make Much Difference to Persuasiveness and Can’t Be Counted On — Not Even When Moderating Conditions Are Specified. Frontiers in Psychology, :. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664160
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664160 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Rourke, H. P., & MacKinnon, D. P.
    (2018) Reasons for Testing Mediation in the Absence of an Intervention Effect: A Research Imperative in Prevention and Intervention Research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, (), –. 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.171
     https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2018.79.171 [Google Scholar]
  31. Outeiral, C., Strahm, M., Shi, J., Morris, G. M., Benjamin, S. C., & Deane, C. M.
    (2021) The Prospects of Quantum Computing in Computational Molecular Biology. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, (), e1481. 10.1002/wcms.1481
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1481 [Google Scholar]
  32. Reijnierse, W. G., Brugman, B. C., & Droog, E.
    (2025) The Differential Effects of Metaphor on Comprehensibility and Comprehension of Environmental Concepts. JCOM, (), A01. 10.22323/150520250702095506
     https://doi.org/10.22323/150520250702095506 [Google Scholar]
  33. Roberson, T., Leach, J., & Raman, S.
    (2021) Talking about Public Good for the Second Quantum Revolution: Analysing Quantum Technology Narratives in the Context of National Strategies. Quantum Science and Technology, (), 025001. 10.1088/2058‑9565/abc5ab
     https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abc5ab [Google Scholar]
  34. Schäfer, M. S.
    (2023) The Notorious GPT: Science Communication in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. JCOM, (), Y02. 10.22323/2.22020402
     https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020402 [Google Scholar]
  35. Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V.
    (2005) The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, (), –. 10.1007/s11051‑005‑7526‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Seel, N.
    (2012) Persuasion and Learning. InN. Seel (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑1428‑6_1928
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1928 [Google Scholar]
  37. Servifyspheresolutions
    Servifyspheresolutions (2025, March21). Superposition Explained: The Spinning Coin Analogy. SSS Quantum. https://medium.com/sss-quantum/superposition-explained-the-spinning-coin-analogy-5ae4d9956065
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Seskir, Z. C., Umbrello, S., Coenen, C., & Vermaas, P. E.
    (2023) Democratization of Quantum Technologies. Quantum Science and Technology, (), 024005. 10.1088/2058‑9565/acb6ae
     https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/acb6ae [Google Scholar]
  39. Slater, D. M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M.
    (2015) Message Variability and Heterogeneity: A Core Challenge for Communication Research. Annals of the International Communication Association. 10.1080/23808985.2015.11679170
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679170 [Google Scholar]
  40. Smedinga, M., Cienki, A., & De Regt, H. W.
    (2023) Metaphors as Tools for Understanding in Science Communication among Experts and to the Public. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.22016.sme
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.22016.sme [Google Scholar]
  41. Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P.
    (2002) The Persuasive Effects of Metaphor: A Meta-Analysis. Human Communication Research, (), –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2002.tb00813.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Stichting Quantum Delta NL
    Stichting Quantum Delta NL (2020) Projectvoorstel Nationaal Groeifonds (No. v8.0; p.).
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Stray, B., Lamb, A., Kaushik, A., Vovrosh, J., Rodgers, A., Winch, J., Hayati, F., Boddice, D., Stabrawa, A., Niggebaum, A., Langlois, M., Lien, Y.-H., Lellouch, S., Roshanmanesh, S., Ridley, K., de Villiers, G., Brown, G., Cross, T., Tuckwell, G., … Holynski, M.
    (2022) Quantum Sensing for Gravity Cartography. Nature, (), Article 7898. 10.1038/s41586‑021‑04315‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04315-3 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ten Holter, C., Inglesant, P., Srivastava, R., & Jirotka, M.
    (2022) Bridging the Quantum Divides: A Chance to Repair Classic(al) Mistakes?Quantum Science and Technology, (), 044006. 10.1088/2058‑9565/ac8db6
     https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ac8db6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S.
    (2017) Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, (), –. 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
     https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17 [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Dam, F., De Bakker, L., Dijkstra, A., & Jensen, E.
    (2020) Science Communication — An Introduction. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 10.1142/11541
     https://doi.org/10.1142/11541 [Google Scholar]
  47. Van de Merbel, A., Peer, J., Willems, S. J. W., & Cramer, J.
    (2024) ‘Quantum Technology Will Change My Life.’ Citizens’ Attitudes and Knowledge of Quantum Science and Technology. Journal of Physics Communications, (), 075005. 10.1088/2399‑6528/ad48d3
     https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ad48d3 [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., Van Dijk, H., & Van Trijp, H. C. M.
    (2015) Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation toward Familiar and Unfamiliar Attitude Objects. PLOS ONE, (), e0141790. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141790
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141790 [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., & Van Trijp, H. C. M.
    (2018) Changes in the Influence of Affect and Cognition over Time on Consumer Attitude Formation toward Nanotechnology: A Longitudinal Survey Study. Public Understanding of Science, (), –. 10.1177/0963662516661292
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516661292 [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Stee, S. K.
    (2018) Meta-Analysis of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages. Communication Studies, (), –. 10.1080/10510974.2018.1457553
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1457553 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vermaas, P. E., Nas, D., Vandersypen, L., & Elkouss Coronas, D.
    (2019) Quantum Internet Vision Team. Delft University of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wackers, D., Meinsma, A. L., Reijnierse, W. G., Van der Heijden, M., Smeets, I., & Cramer, J.
    (2025) ‘Like a light switch that is on and off at the same time’. A content analysis of signaled metaphors for quantum science and technology in Dutch newspapers (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5684902). Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.5684902
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5684902 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R.
    (2018) Quantum Internet: A Vision for the Road ahead. Science, (). 10.1126/science.aam9288
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9288 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wiley, J., Jaeger, A. J., Taylor, A. R., & Griffin, T. D.
    (2018) When Analogies Harm: The Effects of Analogies on Metacomprehension. Learning and Instruction, , –. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wyer, R. S., & Shrum, L. J.
    (2015) The Role of Comprehension Processes in Communication and Persuasion. Media Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/15213269.2014.912584
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912584 [Google Scholar]
  56. Yanowitz, K. L.
    (2001) Using Analogies to Improve Elementary School Students’ Inferential Reasoning About Scientific Concepts. School Science and Mathematics, (), –. 10.1111/j.1949‑8594.2001.tb18016.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18016.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Zook, K. B., & Maier, J. M.
    (1994) Systematic Analysis of Variables that Contribute to the Formation of Analogical Misconceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑0663.86.4.589
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.589 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
Loading
Like a coin spinning in the air
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25018.mei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: comprehension ; science communication ; metaphorical explanations ; quantum science ; quantum technology ; attitude

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error