1887
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Recent research suggests more overlaps between metaphor and metonymy than is often suggested by theoretical and applied studies, which can frequently tend towards cleanly identifying between these figurative operations and presenting a neat set of (quantitative) results. However, differentiating between metaphor and metonymy in real-world contexts is notoriously tricky, and often leaves researchers in a position that demands choosing one or the other as the main focal point of the study. In this article, I reflect on the difficulty of disentangling metaphor from metonymy and vice versa, and some of the interesting research that has previously highlighted the fuzzy boundaries between them, including how these figures may “shape-shift”, across discourses, contexts, and in the mind. Overall, I suggest that concentrating more deliberatively on metaphor and metonymy’s blurred boundaries and shape-shifting tendencies is an important avenue for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25029.odo
2025-10-02
2026-07-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, A.
    (2000) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp.31–58). De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnden, J. A.
    (2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. 10.1515/cogl.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, L.
    (2007) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
    (2006) The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. 10.1093/applin/aml032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032 [Google Scholar]
  5. El Refaie, E.
    (2013) Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors: Breaking out of conceptual prisons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 236–249. 10.1075/rcl.11.2.02elr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.02elr [Google Scholar]
  6. (2019) Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2011) The Allegorical Impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121–130. 10.1080/10508406.2011.556498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.556498 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2022) Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings?Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 20(1), 7–32. 10.1075/rcl.00099.gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00099.gib [Google Scholar]
  9. Goossens, L.
    (1995) Metaphonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action. InL. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy, and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective (pp.159–174). John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.33.06goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.33.06goo [Google Scholar]
  10. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes [University of California, Berkley]. https://escholarship.org/content/qt3g9427m2/qt3g9427m2_noSplash_87927e5c56786241d4df549fe0a0b4b4.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. InR. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Vol.1751, p.791). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
  12. Jakobson, R.
    (2002) The metaphoric and metonymic poles. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp.41–48). De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E.
    (2014) Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297. 10.1080/10926488.2014.948798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.948798 [Google Scholar]
  14. Johansson Falck, M.
    (2018) From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically?Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 61–84. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1434937 [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson, C.
    (1999) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. InM. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.155–170). John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.152.12joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.152.12joh [Google Scholar]
  16. Julich-Warpakowski, N., & Jensen, T. W.
    (2023) Zooming in on the Notion of Metaphoricity: Notions, dimensions, and operationalizations. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 16–36. 10.1075/msw.00027.jul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00027.jul [Google Scholar]
  17. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2013) The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. 10.1080/10926488.2013.768498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.768498 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors We Live By (W. a new Afterword, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Littlemore, J.
    (2017) Metonymy. InB. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (1st ed., pp.407–422). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.026 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241441
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441 [Google Scholar]
  23. Littlemore, J., & Fielden-Burns, L. V.
    (2023) On the fringes of metaphor: Using ambiguously figurative vague language to pragmatically negotiate sensitive topics in the English as a Medium of Instruction classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 2091, 1–14. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.016 [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller, C.
    (2008) Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2017) Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Radden, G.
    (2003) How Metonymic Are Metaphors. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 407–434.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25029.odo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25029.odo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): discourse; dynamic; figurative continuum; metaphor; metonymy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error