1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Children’s ability to interpret metaphorical polysemy in educational materials
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Metaphor is used as a tool for communicating specialist knowledge to non-specialists in popular discourse and in educational contexts. Research has explored its use in higher education, but less is known about its efficacy with learners of school age. Experimental research has shown that very young children are able to interpret and produce attributional metaphors, but that relational metaphors and analogies do not seem to be understood until late childhood. The qualitative study reported here complements that work. We interviewed 30 children aged between 10 and 12 in focus groups, eliciting instances of academic words and meanings that they found new and challenging, and using naturally-occurring educational texts as prompts for discussion about individual words. We found some awareness of polysemy in general, and of word meanings that have a metaphorical basis. However, when they encountered a new metaphor-related meaning of a known word, the children showed a tendency to fall back on the previously known meaning even where this was contextually unfeasible. When specifically asked to work out the new meanings, it became evident that this is often challenging for them even with scaffolding.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
2026-04-03
2026-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/msw.25035.dei/msw.25035.dei.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Booton, S., Hodgkiss, A., Mathers, A., & Murphy, V.
    (2022a) Measuring knowledge of multiple word meanings in children with English as a first and an additional language and the relationship to reading comprehension. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000921000052
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000052 [Google Scholar]
  2. Booton, S., Wonnacott, E. Hodgkiss, A., Mathers, S. & Murphy, V.
    (2022b) Children’s knowledge of multiple word meanings: Which factors count, and for whom?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amab028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab028 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd, R.
    (1993) Metaphor and theory change: what is ’metaphor’ a metaphor for?InOrtony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023 [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, V. & Clarke, V.
    (2021) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 [Google Scholar]
  5. Byrne, D.
    (2022) A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity, , –. 10.1007/s11135‑021‑01182‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron, L.
    (2002) Metaphors in the learning of science: A discourse focus. British Educational Research Journal, (), –. 10.1080/0141192022000015534
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000015534 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2003) Metaphor in Educational Discourse. Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Carriedo, N., Corral, A., Montoro, P. R., Herrero, L., Ballestrino, P. & Sebastiàn, I.
    (2016) The development of metaphor comprehension and its relationship with relational verbal reasoning and executive function. Plos One, –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150289
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150289 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruse, A.
    (1986) Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Daane, A., Haglund, J., Robertson, A., Close, H., & Scherr, R.
    (2018) The pedagogical value of conceptual metaphor for secondary science teachers. Science Teacher Education, , –. 10.1002/sce.21451
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21451 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deckert, M., Schmoeger, M., Schaunig-Busch, I., & Willinger, U.
    (2019) Metaphor processing in middle childhood and at the transition to early adolescence: the role of chronological age, mental age, and verbal intelligence. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000918000491
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000491 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deignan, A., Semino, E., & Paul, S.
    (2019) Metaphors of climate science in three genres: research articles, educational texts, and secondary school student talk. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amx035
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx035 [Google Scholar]
  13. Deignan, A., Candarli, D., & Oxley, F.
    (2023) The linguistic challenge of the transition to secondary school: A corpus study of academic language. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Denroche, C.
    (2018) Text metaphtonymy: The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.16011.den
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.16011.den [Google Scholar]
  15. Fang, Z.
    (2006) The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, (), –. 10.1080/09500690500339092
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gentner, D.
    (1988) Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, (), –. 10.2307/1130388
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1130388 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gentner, D. & Gentner, D. R.
    (1983) Flowing Waters and Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity. InD. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models, (pp.–). Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibbs, R.
    (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanks, P.
    (2013) Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hessel, A. & Murphy, V. A.
    (2019) Understanding how time flies and what it means to be on cloud nine: English as an Additional Language (EAL) learners’ metaphor comprehension. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000918000399
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000399 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hume, K.
    (2011) Using metaphor and analogy for better student learning. Teach Magazine. [https://teachmag.com/using-metaphor-and-analogy-for-better-student-learning/] accessed28th July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Knudsen, S.
    (2003) Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00187‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00187-X [Google Scholar]
  23. Low, G.
    (2008) Metaphor and education. InGibbs, R. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.014 [Google Scholar]
  24. Moon, R.
    (1986) The analysis of meaning. InJ. Sinclair (Eds.) Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing (pp.–). Collins ELT.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2016) Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.208
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.208 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nippold, M.
    (2006) Language development in school-age children, adolescents and adults. InK. Brown (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp.–). Elsevier Science. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00852‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00852-X [Google Scholar]
  27. Nippold, M. & Taylor, C.
    (2002) Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, , –. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2002/030)
     https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/030) [Google Scholar]
  28. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Quigley, A.
    (2019) ‘How to develop vocabulary in the classroom’ inEducation Nexthttps://www.educationnext.org/how-to-develop-vocabulary-classroom/. AccessedJuly 28th 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. QSR International Pty Ltd
    QSR International Pty Ltd (2020) NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software [software]. www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
  31. Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D.
    (2010) Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, , –. 10.1348/026151009X454373
     https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X454373 [Google Scholar]
  32. Smedinga, M., Cienki, A., & de Regt, H. W.
    (2023) Metaphors as tools for understanding in science communication among experts and to the public. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.22016.sme
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.22016.sme [Google Scholar]
  33. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrman, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2019) MIPVU: A manual for identifying metaphor-related words. InS. Nacey & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.) Converging evidence in language and communication research (pp.–). John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.22.02ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.02ste [Google Scholar]
  34. Werkmann Horvat, A., Štrkalj Despot, K., & Hržica, G.
    (2024) Early acquisition of figurative meaning in polysemous nouns and verbs. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/langcog.2024.46
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2024.46 [Google Scholar]
  35. Willinger, U., Deckert, M., Schmöger, M., Schaunig-Busch, I., Formann, A. K., & Auff, E.
    (2019) Developmental steps in metaphorical language abilities: The influence of age, gender, cognitive flexibility, information processing speed, and analogical reasoning. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/0023830917746552
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917746552 [Google Scholar]
  36. Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A., & Gardner, H.
    (1976) The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0012‑1649.12.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.12.4.289 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
Loading
Children’s ability to interpret metaphorical polysemy in educational materials
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.25035.dei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: polysemy ; children ; metaphor ; school language

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error