1887
image of Metaphors of happiness in Spanish
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper investigates the affective dimension of metaphor meaning. Previous research has extensively examined the role of metaphor conventionality in metaphor comprehension, however, less attention has been given to whether the level of conventionality — a metaphor’s familiarity or salience — is related to its affective component. This study addresses that question in the context of happiness metaphors in Spanish. The study has two main objectives. First, metaphorical expressions related to happiness were identified and categorized into conceptual metaphors using a sample of language taken from the Corpus del Español. Second, sixty participants evaluated 96 metaphorical expressions of happiness in terms of affective valence strength, familiarity, and imageability. The ratings revealed strong correlations among the three variables: metaphors that were more familiar and easier to imagine tended to be associated with more extreme affective valence values. Nevertheless, subsequent regression-based mediation analysis suggested that the influence of familiarity on valence may be mediated by imageability. The findings are discussed in relation to embodied models of conceptual metaphor representation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.26013.rea
2026-07-07
2026-07-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M.
    (2007) Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, (), –. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baiocco, L., Kielar, A., & Lai, V. T.
    (2026) Metaphor comprehension in neurotypical adults: A scoping review of event related potential studies. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, –. 10.3758/s13415‑025‑01376‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01376-z [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F.
    (2009) Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, (), –. 10.1093/cercor/bhn217
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn217 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brysbaert, M.
    (2025) Concreteness and imageability norms. InReference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
    (1999) Metaphor Comprehension: FromComparison to Categorization. Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.–). Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781410603494
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603494 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C.
    (2011) Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Citron, F. M., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2014) Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/jocn_a_00654
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654 [Google Scholar]
  8. Citron, F. M., Cacciari, C., Funcke, J. M., Hsu, C. T., & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2019) Idiomatic expressions evoke stronger emotional responses in the brain than literal sentences, Neuropsychologia, , –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, P.
    (2010) A cognitive study of “Happiness” metaphors in English and Chinese idioms. Asian Culture and History, (), . 10.5539/ach.v2n2p172
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v2n2p172 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiarello, C., Shears, C., & Lund, K.
    (1999) Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, (), –. 10.3758/BF03200739
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200739 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawford, L. E., Cohn, S. M., Kim, A. B.
    (2014) “Good Is Up” Is Not Always Better: A Memory Advantage for Words in Metaphor-Incompatible Locations. PLoS ONE(): e108269. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108269
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108269 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dymarska, A., Connell, L., & Banks, B.
    (2025) Weaker than you might imagine: Determining imageability effects on word recognition, Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104398
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104398 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A.
    (1987) Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, (), –. 10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Forgács, B.
    (2014) Figures of language in cognitive science in the light of figurative language processing in the brain [Doctoral dissertation, Budapest University of Technology and Economics].
  15. Gibbs, G.
    (1998) Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Brooks University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
  17. Giora, R.
    (1996) Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, : 000
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hailu, G. N., Abdelkader, M., Meles, H. A., & Teklu, T.
    (2024) Understanding the support needs and challenges faced by family caregivers in the care of their older adults at home. A Qualitative Study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, (), –. 10.2147/CIA.S451833
    https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S451833 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamdi, S.
    (2015) A Cognitive Study of happiness metaphors in English, Tunisian Arabic and Spanish. Arab World English Journal, , –. 10.24093/awej/vol6no1.11
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no1.11 [Google Scholar]
  20. Horton, W. S.
    (2013) Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, , –. 10.1080/10926488.2013.797735
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.797735 [Google Scholar]
  21. Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D.
    (2018) Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, (), –. 10.1037/bul0000145
    https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000145 [Google Scholar]
  22. Katz, A. & Paivio, A., Marschark, M. & Clark, J.
    (1988) Norms for 204 Literary and 260 Nonliterary Metaphors on 10 Psychological Dimensions. Metaphor and Symbol, , –. 10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lai, V. T., Curran, T., & Menn, L.
    (2009) Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study. Brain Research, (), –. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Langacker, R. W.
    (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor and culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Philologica, (), –. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  27. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S.
    (2007) Mediation Analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, (), –. 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 [Google Scholar]
  28. Margolies, S. O., & Crawford, L. E.
    (2008) Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, (), –. 10.1080/02699930701810335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701810335 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mon, S. K., Nencheva, M., Citron, F. M. M., Lew-Williams, C., & Goldberg, A.
    (2021) Conventional metaphors elicit greater real-time engagement than literal paraphrases or concrete sentences, Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104285
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104285 [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller, C. & Tag, S.
    (2010) The dynamics of metaphor: foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, , –. 10.3726/81610_85
    https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ojhu, O., & Yigezu, M.
    (2022) Metaphorical conceptualization of happiness in anywaa. Journal of Ethiopian Studies/Haile Sellassie I University, Institute of Ethiopian Studies, LIV, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pomp, J., Bestgen, A. K., Schulze, P., Müller, C. J., Citron, F. M. M., Suchan, B., & Kuchinke, L.
    (2018) Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts, Brain and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S.
    (2005) The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development Psychopathology, (), –. 10.1017/S0954579405050340
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340 [Google Scholar]
  34. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F.
    (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  35. Raghunath, B. L., Mulatti, C., Neoh, M. J. Y., Bornstein, M. H., & Esposito, G.
    (2021) The associations between imageability of positive and negative valence words and fear reactivity. Psychiatry International, , –. 10.3390/psychiatryint2010003
    https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint2010003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Reali, F. & Arciniegas, C.
    (2015) Metaphorical conceptualization of emotion in Spanish: Two studies on the role of framing. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.5.1.02rea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.02rea [Google Scholar]
  37. Reali, F., & Lleras, M.
    (2017) Perspectives in motion: The case of metaphorical temporal statements in Spanish. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/langcog.2016.14
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.14 [Google Scholar]
  38. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W. and McRae, K.
    (2003) Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, : –. 10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rojo, A., Ramos, M., & Valenzuela, J.
    (2014) The emotional impact of translation: A heart rate study. Journal of Pragmatics, , . 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  40. Russell, J. A.
    (1980) A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), . 10.1037/h0077714
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 [Google Scholar]
  41. Seidi, K., Janfeshan, K., Janfeshan, M. M., & Faramarzi, A.
    (2021) A comparison of happiness metaphors in English and Laki language: An Iranian context. Akshara: An International Refereed Research Journal of English Literature and Language, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Soriano, C.
    (2003) Some anger metaphors in Spanish and English. A contrastive review. International Journal of English Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Soriano, C., & Pieta, A.
    (2022) The affect bias in the metaphorical representation of anticipated events. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.18034.pia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18034.pia [Google Scholar]
  44. Sopory, P.
    (2005) Metaphor and Affect. Poetics Today, , –. 10.1215/03335372‑26‑3‑433
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-26-3-433 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
    (2002) Relevance theory. InD. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Relevance theory (pp.–). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.26013.rea
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.26013.rea
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error