1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper examines conceptual metaphor use by graduate-student writing consultants in a university writing center. Our goal was to develop a taxonomy for consultant metaphor in asynchronous online consultations; to find evidence that consultants could produce deliberate metaphors as an instructional strategy when responding asynchronously by e-mail to students and their texts; and to compare these data with Thonus’s (2010) investigation of consultant metaphor use in face-to-face consultations, Results showed that writing consultants trained in the use of strategic metaphors employed them in subsequent consultations. In addition, trained consultants used deliberate, coherent, and systematic metaphors in all six categories of our analysis, and they exploited metaphors students had developed in their writing. In comparison with their pre-training metaphor use, the consultants demonstrated increased metaphor use after training and used metaphors significantly differently from consultants who had received no training. We discuss these results in terms of deliberate vs. non-deliberate metaphor use in writing instruction, and we consider the feasibility and advisability of training writing center consultants to employ metaphors — specifically coherent, systematic metaphors — as vehicles for writing instruction in an online setting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.1.03tho
2016-05-09
2018-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens, K
    (2010) Mapping principles for cognitive metaphors. In G. Low , Z. Todd , A. Deignan , & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 185–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.12ahr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.12ahr [Google Scholar]
  2. Baake, K
    (2000) Metaphor in the writing center: How to place enthymemes in the solar system. Writing Lab Newsletter, 25(1), 12–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, R
    (2003) Conceptual metaphor, language, literature, and pedagogy. Journal of Language and Learning, 1(2), 59–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boers, F
    (2000) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.4.553
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2003) Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231–238. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunk-Chavez, B. , & Martin, J
    (2002) The journey out: Conceptual mapping and the writing process. Academic Exchange Quarterly, Fall, 193–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron, L
    (1999) Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.009 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2008) Metaphor and talk. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr . (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, L. , & Deignan, A
    (2003) Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, L. , & Maslen, R
    (2010a) Identifying metaphors in discourse data. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cameron, L. , Low, G.D. , & Maslen, R
    (2010b) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 117–146). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, L. , & Stelma, J.H
    (2004) Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 107–136. doi: 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carter, S. , & Pitcher, R
    (2010) Extended metaphors for pedagogy: Using sameness and difference. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 579–589. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.491904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491904 [Google Scholar]
  15. Charteris-Black, J
    (2012) Forensic deliberations on “purposeful metaphor.”Metaphor & The Social World, 2(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha [Google Scholar]
  16. Deignan, A
    (2006) The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 106–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2010) The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 44–56). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2011) Deliberateness is not unique to metaphor: A response to Gibbs. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 57–60. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.05dei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.05dei [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunbar-Wells, R
    (1999) The relevance of metaphor to effective voice teaching strategies. Australian Voice, 5, 50–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Elbow, P. , & Belanoff, P
    (1999) Sharing and responding (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Erman, B
    (2007) Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(1), 25–53. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.12.1.04erm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.1.04erm [Google Scholar]
  22. Eubanks, P
    (2011) Metaphor and writing: Figurative thought in the discourse of written communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gentner, D. , & Bowdle, B.F
    (2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3&4), 223–247. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbs, R.W., Jr
    (1999) Researching metaphor. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 29–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2006) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00285.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x [Google Scholar]
  26. (2011a) Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  27. (2011b) Author’s response: Advancing the debate on deliberate metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibbs, R.W., Jr. , Lima, P.L.C. , & Francozo, E
    (2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goatly, A
    (2011) The language of metaphors (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gorman, R. , & Eastman, G.S
    (2010) “I see what you mean”: Using visuals to teach metaphoric thinking in reading and writing. English Journal, 100(1), 92–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hewett, B
    (2015) The online writing conference: A guide for teachers and consultants. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hiraga, M.K
    (2005) Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analyzing texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Holme, R
    (2004) Mind, metaphor, and language teaching. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kathpalia, S.S. , & Carmel, H.L.H
    (2011) Metaphorical competence in ESL student writing. RELC Journal, 42, 273–290. doi: 10.1177/0033688211419379
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211419379 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kalyuga, M. , & Kalyuga, S
    (2008) Metaphor awareness in teaching vocabulary. Language Learning Journal, 36, 249–257. doi: 10.1080/09571730802390767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802390767 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kövecses, Z
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lai, V.T. , Curran, T. , & Menn, L
    (2009) Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1284, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lakoff, G
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2006) Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lambkin, B
    (2012) Migration as a metaphor for metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 180–200. doi: 10.1075/msw.2.2.03lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.2.03lam [Google Scholar]
  42. Langston, W
    (2002) Violating orientational metaphors slows reading. Discourse Processes, 34, 281–310. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3403_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3403_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Levin, T. , & Wagner, T
    (2006) In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom. Instructional Science, 34, 227–278. doi: 10.1007/s11251‑005‑6929‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-6929-x [Google Scholar]
  44. Littlemore, J. , Krennmayr, T. , Turner, J. , & Turner, S
    (2014) An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Littlemore, J. , & Low, G.D
    (2006a) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230627567
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627567 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2006b) Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Low, G.D
    (1999) “This paper thinks…” Investigating the acceptability of the metaphor an essay is a person. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 221–247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.014 [Google Scholar]
  48. Low, G.D. , Littlemore, J. , & Koester, A
    (2008) Metaphor use in three UK university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29, 428–455. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn008 [Google Scholar]
  49. Low, G.D. , & Todd, Z
    (2010) Good practice in metaphor analysis: Guidelines and pitfalls. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 217–229). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mashal, N. , & Faust, M
    (2009) Conventionalisation of novel metaphors: A shift in hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality, 14(6), 573–589.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Miles, L. , Gormley, M. , Volpe, C.F. , Roche, C. , Hays, E. , & Amidon, S
    (2001) Exploring multiple intelligences in the writing center. Writing Lab Newsletter, 26(2), 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Müller, C
    (2011) Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 61–66. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.06mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.06mul [Google Scholar]
  53. Petrie, H.G
    (1993) Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (1st ed.) (pp. 438–461). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Petrie, H.G. , & Oshlag, R.S
    (1999) Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 579–609). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Pugh, S
    (1992) Bridging: A teacher’s guide to metaphorical thinking. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Reddy, M.J
    (1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 164–201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ricoeur, P
    (1997) The rule of metaphor: Multidisciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. ( R. Czerny , K. McLaughlin , & J. Costello , Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rivers, S
    (2010) Bringing it all together: Applying metaphor analysis to online discussions in a doctorate study. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 230–247). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ronesi, L
    (2009) Theory in/to practice: Multilingual tutors supporting multilingual peers. Writing Center Journal, 29(2), 75–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schmitt, R
    (2005) Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. Retrieved fromwww.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-2/schmitt.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Semino, E
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Shaw, D. , & Mahlios, M
    (2014) Adult literacy students’ metaphors of reading and writing. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(1), 21–34. doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2013.558
    https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2013.558 [Google Scholar]
  63. Smith, B
    (2010)  Ships in the night: A study of conceptual metaphor use for teaching first-year writing . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 3485928.
  64. Steen, G.J
    (2011) What does “really deliberate” really mean?Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  65. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S.T
    (2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 171, 63–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Tendahl, M
    (2009) A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230244313
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244313 [Google Scholar]
  67. Thonus, T
    (2002) Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is “success”?Assessing Writing, 8, 110–134. doi: 10.1016/S1075‑2935(03)00002‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(03)00002-3 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2004) What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 227–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  69. (2010)  Metaphorical language in writing center consultations . International Writing Centers Association, Baltimore, MD, 5November.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Villamil, O.S. , & de Guerrero, M.C.M
    (2005) Constructing theoretical notions of L2 writing through metaphor conceptualization. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 79–90). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1‑4020‑2954‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2954-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  71. Weaver, M.E
    (2003) Transcending “conversing”: A deaf student in the writing center. In C. Murphy & S. Sherwood (Eds.), The St. Martin’s sourcebook for writing consultants (2nd ed.) (pp.221–232). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Williams, J. , & Severino, C
    (2004) The writing center and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  73. Willox, A.C. , Harper, S.L. , Bridger, D. , Morton, S. , Orbach, A. , & Sarapura, S
    (2010) Co-creating metaphor in the classroom for deeper learning: Graduate student reflections. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 71–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Yu, N
    (2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr . (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.1.03tho
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error