1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper I analyze the role of metaphor and metonymy in framing conflict events. In particular, when framing a terrorist attack in media discourse these two linguistic elements are crucial for the interpretation of the event. The data from two Russian newspapers, the “Novaja Gazeta” and the “Rossijskaja Gazeta”, show how metaphorical and metonymical processes are used to promote a particular interpretation and modify the structure of the event itself.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.1.06pin
2016-05-09
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bathia, M.V
    (2005) Fighting words: Naming terrorists, bandits, rebels and other violent actors. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1080/0143659042000322874
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000322874 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benveniste, É
    (1946/1966) Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe. InProblèmes de linguistique générale, 1 (pp. 225–236). Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benveniste, É (1956/1966) La nature des pronomes. InProblèmes de linguistique générale, 1 (pp. 251–257). Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L. , Pelosi, A. , & Pedroso de Moraes Feltes, H
    (2014) Metaphorizing violence in the UK and Brazil: A contrastive discourse dynamics study. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 23–43. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2014.859048
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.859048 [Google Scholar]
  5. Charteris-Black, J
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D.A
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunn, E.W. , Moore, M. , & Nosek, B.A
    (2005) The war of the words: How linguistic differences in reporting shape perceptions of terrorism. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 67–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1530‑2415.2005.00056.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00056.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, N
    (1989) Language and power. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferrari, A
    (2007) Breve storia del Caucaso. Rome: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goossens, L
    (2003) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–378). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hellsten, I
    (2000) Dolly: Scientific breakthrough or Frankenstein’s monster? Journalistic and scientific metaphors of cloning. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(4), 213–221. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1504_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1504_3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hellsten, I. , & Renvall, M
    (1997) Inside or outside of politics? Metaphor and paradox in journalism. Nordicom Review, 18(2), 41–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hughes, J
    (2007) The Chechnya conflict: Freedom fighters or terrorists?Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 15(3), 293–311. doi: 10.3200/DEMO.15.3.293‑311
    https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.15.3.293-311 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hűlsse, R. , & Spencer, A
    (2008) The metaphor of terror: Terrorism. Studies and the Constructivist Turn. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 571–92. doi: 10.1177/0967010608098210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608098210 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kagarlitsky, B
    (2006) The anatomy of terror. Russian Politics and Law, 44(1), January-February, 81–93. doi: 10.2753/RUP1061‑1940440106
    https://doi.org/10.2753/RUP1061-1940440106 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy, V
    (2000) Intended tropes and unintended metatropes in reporting on the war in Kosovo. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(4), 253–265. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1504_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1504_6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kövecses, Z
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kruglanski, A.W. , Crenshaw, M. , Post, J.M. , & Victoroff, J
    (2008) What should this fight be called? Metaphors of counterterrorism and their implications. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(3), 97–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1539‑6053.2008.00035.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00035.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, G
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.) (pp.202–251). Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2001) Metaphors of terror. Retrieved: www.press.uchicago.edu/sites/daysafter/911lakoff.html
  21. (2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2006) Thinking points. Communicating our American values and vision. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lu, L. , & Ahrens, K
    (2008) Ideological influence on building metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 383–408. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088966 [Google Scholar]
  25. Musolff, A
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2012) Special feature. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 301–310. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300 [Google Scholar]
  27. Norris, P. , Kern, M. , & Just, M
    (2003) Framing terrorism. The news media, the government and the public. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Popovski, V
    (2007) Terrorizing civilians as a “counter-terrorist operation”: Crimes and impunity in Chechenya. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 7(3), 431–447. doi: 10.1080/14683850701566393
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850701566393 [Google Scholar]
  29. Radden, G
    (2000) How metonymic are metaphors?In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 93–108). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J
    (1997) Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction. Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies, 19(1), 281–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Russel, J
    (2005) Terrorists, bandits, spooks and thieves: Russian demonization of the Chechens before and since 9/11. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 101–116. doi: 10.1080/0143659042000322937
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000322937 [Google Scholar]
  32. Santulli, F
    (2005) Le parole del potere, il potere delle parole: Retorica e discorso politico. Milan: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tuman, J.S
    (2003) Communicating terror: The rhetorical dimension of terrorism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vervaeke, J. , & Kennedy, J.M
    (1996) Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(4), 273–284. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1104_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1104_3 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wierzbicka, A
    (1997) Understanding cultures through their key words. English, Russian, Polish, German and Japanese. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson, J
    (1990) Politically speaking. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.1.06pin
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): metaphor , metonymy , news media , Russian and terrorism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error