1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The distinction between ‘deliberate’ and ‘non deliberate’ metaphors has been developed within a five-step framework (Steen) of metaphor production. Deliberate metaphors invite the addressee to pay special attention to their cross-domain structure mapping rather than focusing primarily on the topical proposition. This paper presents results of a pilot survey eliciting interpretations for the metaphors a nation is a body/a nation is a person from an international sample of respondents in 10 different countries. ESL/EFL users from diverse cultural and/or linguistic backgrounds were asked to apply the metaphorical idiom to their home nations. The responses show systematic variation in preferred metaphor interpretations, some of which can be linked to dominant cultural traditions, as well as evidence of polemical and/or ironic elaboration. Neither of these findings is predicted by classic conceptualist models that describe metaphor understanding as an automatic and unconscious process. Instead, when paying special attention to metaphoricity, informants seem to have chosen between diverse interpretation versions and in some cases to have elaborated them further to achieve social pragmatic effects. These findings provide new supporting evidence for Deliberate Metaphor Theory by highlighting deliberateness in metaphor interpretation and outlining perspectives for further empirical testing of metaphor understanding in specific registers and usage contexts (e.g., political discourse, EFL/ESL acquisition).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus
2016-10-14
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bertelli, S
    (2001) The king’s body. Sacred rituals of power in medieval and early modern Europe. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Callahan, W.A
    (2009) The cartography of national humiliation and the emergence of China’s geobody. Public Culture, 21(1), 141–173. doi: 10.1215/08992363‑2008‑024
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2008-024 [Google Scholar]
  3. Charbonnel, N
    (2010) Comme un seul home. Corps politique et corps mystique, 2 vols. Lons Le Saunier: Aréopage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chilton, P. , & Lakoff, G
    (1995) Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp.37–55). Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deignan, A
    (2011) Deliberateness is not unique to metaphor: A response to Gibbs. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.05dei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.05dei [Google Scholar]
  6. Díaz Vera, J.E
    (Ed.) (2014) Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbs, R.W
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2011a) Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  10. (2011b) Advancing the debate on deliberate metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbs, R.W. , & Colston, H
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
  12. Giora, R
    (2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Glucksberg, S
    (2001) Understanding figurative language. From metaphors to idioms. With a contribution byM. S. McGlone. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2008) How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Guldin, R
    (2000) Körpermetaphern: Zum Verhältnis von Politik und Medizin. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hale, D.G
    (1971) The body politic. A political metaphor in renaissance English literature. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Idström, A. , & Piirainen, E
    (Eds.) in cooperation withFalzett, T. F. M (2012) Endangered metaphors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/clscc.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kantorowicz, E.H
    (1997) The king’s two bodies. A study in medieval political theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kövecses, Z
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, G
    (1996) Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. The essential guide for progressives. Foreword byHoward Dean. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980/2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Littlemore, J. , Chen, P. , Koester, A. , & Barnden, J
    (2011) Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009 [Google Scholar]
  27. MacArthur, F. , Littlemore, J. , & Krennmayr, T
    (2013) seeing is not just understanding: Sight metaphors in undergraduate office hours’ consultations. Presentation, 3rd international conference on Meaning Construction, Meaning Interpretation: Applications and Implications (CILAP/CRAL) . Logroño, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller, C
    (2011) Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really special? Deliberateness in the light of metaphor activation. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.06mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.06mul [Google Scholar]
  29. Musolff, A
    (2010) Political metaphor and bodies politic. In U. Okulska & P. Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse (pp.23–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.36.05mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.36.05mus [Google Scholar]
  30. (2011) Metaphor in discourse history. In M.E. Winters , H. Tissari , & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp.70–90). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2014) Metaphors: Sources for intercultural misunderstanding?International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 42–59. doi: 10.1075/ijolc.1.1.03mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.1.1.03mus [Google Scholar]
  32. Musolff, A. , MacArthur, F. , & Pagani, G
    (Eds.) (2014) Metaphor and intercultural communication. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nacey, S
    (2013) Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/milcc.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Philip, G
    (2010) “Drugs, traffic, and many other dirty interests”: Metaphor and the language learner. In G. Low , Z. Todd , A. Deignan , & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp.63–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.05phi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.05phi [Google Scholar]
  35. Piquer-Piriz, A.M
    (2010) Can people be cold and warm? Developing understanding of figurative meanings of temperature terms in early EFL. In G. Low , Z. Todd , A. Deignan , & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp.21–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.03piq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.03piq [Google Scholar]
  36. Pragglejaz Group
    (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22, 1–40. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharifian, F
    (2014) Conceptual metaphor in intercultural communication between speakers of Aboriginal English and Australian English. In A. Musolff , F. MacArthur , & G. Pagani (Eds.), Metaphor and intercultural communication (pp.117–129). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2015) Cultural linguistics: The development of a multidisciplinary paradigm. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(1), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sharifian, F. , Dirven, R. , Yu, N. , & Niemeier, S
    (Eds.) (2008) Culture, body, and language. Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199109 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shogimen, T
    (2008) Treating the body politic: The medical metaphor of political rule in late medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan. The Review of Politics, 70, 77–104. doi: 10.1017/S0034670508000181
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670508000181 [Google Scholar]
  41. Steen, G.J
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. doi: 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2009) From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: Analyzing metaphor in poetry. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains, gaps (pp.197–226). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Steen, G.J. , Dorst, A. , Herrmann, B. , Kaal, A. , Krennmayr, T. , & Pasma, T
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  44. Steen, G.J
    (2011a) What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  45. (2011b) From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. metaphorik.de, 21, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, C. , & Dowker, A
    (2010) A cross-cultural study of metaphoric understanding. In G. Low , Z. Todd , A. Deignan , & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp.105–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.07wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.07wan [Google Scholar]
  47. Watts, M.T
    (2009) Reading the landscape of Europe. Rochester, NY: Nature Study Guild Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu, N
    (2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2015) Embodiment, culture, and language. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp.227–239). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error