1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Is income inequality more of a or a in our economy? Both metaphors capture something about wealth disparities, but only seems to emphasize the fact that our economy is a complex system, where activity in one region may lead to a cascade of problems in other parts of the system. In the present study, we introduce a novel method for classifying such ‘systemic’ metaphors, which reveals that people can reliably identify the extent to which a metaphor highlights the complex causal structure of a target domain. In a second experiment, we asked whether exposing people to more systemic metaphors would induce a systems-thinking mindset and influence reasoning on a seemingly unrelated task that measured the degree to which people reasoned about a domain in terms of complex causal relations. We found that participants who were primed with systemic metaphors scored higher on subsequent tasks that measured relational and holistic thinking, supporting the view that these metaphors can promote systems thinking. Our discussion highlights the potential role of systemic metaphors in facilitating reasoning and decision-making in complex domains.

© 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
2016-10-14
2024-12-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boroditsky, L. , Fuhrman, O. , & McCormick, K
    (2010) Do English and Mandarin speakers think differently about time?Cognition, 118, 123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, T.L
    (2003) Making truth: Metaphor in science. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Capra, F
    (1985) Criteria of systems thinking. Futures, 17, 475–478. doi: 10.1016/0016‑3287(85)90059‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(85)90059-X [Google Scholar]
  4. Checkland, P.B
    (1972) Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 3, 87–116.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi, I. , Dalal, R. , Kim-Prieto, C. , & Park, H
    (2003) Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46–59. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.84.1.46
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.46 [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, I. , Koo, M. , & Choi, J.A
    (2007) Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. doi: 10.1177/0146167206298568
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298568 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, H.H
    (1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp.27–63). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑505850‑6.50008‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50008-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, A.C. , & Stroink, M.L
    (2015) The relationship between systems thinking and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Available online pre-publication: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sres.2371/full. doi: 10.1002/sres.2371
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2371
  9. Dweck, C
    (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House LLC.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Flusberg, S.J. , Thibodeau, P.H. , Sternberg, D.A. , & Glick, J.J
    (2010) A connectionist approach to embodied conceptual metaphor. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00197
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00197 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gentner, D
    (1983) Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J
    (1980) Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(80)90013‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hauser, D.J. , & Schwarz, N
    (2014) The war on prevention bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 66–77. doi: 10.1177/0146167214557006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214557006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G
    (2002) Moral politics: How conservatives and liberals think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471006.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471006.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Landau, M.J. , Sullivan, D. , & Greenberg, J
    (2009) Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 1421–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02462.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02462.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Maani, K.E. , & Maharaj, V
    (2004) Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20, 21–48. doi: 10.1002/sdr.281
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.281 [Google Scholar]
  18. Maddux, W.W. , & Yuki, M
    (2006) The “ripple effect”: Cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 669–683. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283840
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205283840 [Google Scholar]
  19. Masuda, T. , & Nisbett, R.E
    (2006) Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381–399. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nisbett, R.E. , Peng, K. , Choi, I. , & Norenzayan, A
    (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.108.2.291
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pennebaker, J.W. , Chung, C.K. , Ireland, M. , Gonzales, A. , & Booth, R.J
    (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. Net.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Richmond, B
    (1993) Systems thinking – critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9, 113–133. doi: 10.1002/sdr.4260090203
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260090203 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rottman, B.M. , Gentner, D. , & Goldwater, M.B
    (2012) Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive science, 36, 919–932. doi: 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2012.01253.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01253.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Rozenblit, L. , & Keil, F
    (2002) The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Steen, G.J. , Reijnierse, W.G. , & Burgers, C
    (2014) When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS ONE, 9(12), e113536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113536
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113536 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rutherford, E
    (1911) The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 21, 669–688. doi: 10.1080/14786440508637080
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440508637080 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sweeney, L.B. , & Sterman, J
    (2007) Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. Systems Dynamics Review, 23, 285–312. doi: 10.1002/sdr.366
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366 [Google Scholar]
  28. Thibodeau, P.H. , & Boroditsky, L
    (2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2015) Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133939
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 [Google Scholar]
  31. Traugott, E.C
    (1978) On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, Word structure (pp.369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Vendetti, M.S. , Wu, A. , & Holyoak, K.J
    (2014) Far-out thinking: Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science, 25, 928–933. doi: 10.1177/0956797613518079
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518079 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolff, P. , & Gentner, D
    (2011) Structure mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35, 1456–1488. doi: 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01194.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01194.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analogy; decision-making; framing; intervention; metaphor; systems thinking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error