1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Metaphor and the Social World
  4. Volume 7, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper contributes to the study of religious metaphor by combining discourse analysis with cognitive semantics. In particular, it engages in a diachronic study of 30 pamphlets written by British Quakers and addressed to the general public to investigate the consistency of metaphor use in that genre across three and a half centuries. Consistency is seen as metaphors recording the same source domains and/or scenarios and/or lexical realisations across time, with maximum consistency meeting all three criteria.

Utilising the notions of genre and discourse community along with metaphor domains and scenarios, the analysis shows that among 19 metaphor domains that occur in texts from at least two different centuries, just under 60 per cent are highly or maximally consistent, with domains of maximum consistency being the largest group. The changing purposes of the pamphlet genre and the evolving social and historical contexts do not diminish this long-term metaphor consistency.

This overall finding is explained with recourse to the dual-processing/representation theory of religious cognition, which posits a difference between theological and basic everyday representations and processing of God concepts. Quakerism shows an overall lack of abstract theology, with Quakers instead establishing various metaphors for God to express their lived experience of the divine. The remarkable consistency of metaphors in Quaker pamphlets suggests that Quakerism makes God concepts intuitively meaningful and relevant.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
2017-07-06
2023-09-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous (c.2006) Quakers: The Religious Society of Friends. London: Friends Meeting House.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett, J. L.
    (2000) Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(99)01419‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2011) Cognitive science of religion: Looking back, looking forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(2), 229–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5906.2011.01564.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01564.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett, J. L. , & Keil, F. C.
    (1996) Anthropomorphism and God concepts: Conceptualizing a non-natural entity. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219–247. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, R.
    (1970) Aspects of 17th century Quaker rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63, 67–74. doi: 10.1080/00335637009382985
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637009382985 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeve, L. , & Feyaerts, K.
    (eds.) (1999) Metaphor and God-talk. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chandler, W. , Pyot, A. , Hodges, J. et al.
    (1693/1739) A brief apology in behalf of the people, in derision, call’d, Quakers. Written for the information of our sober and well-inclined neighbours. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: William Cuthbert. Available atquod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/n01698.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext, accessed26 July 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2014) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M.
    eds. (forthcoming). Religious language, metaphor and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Creasey, M. A.
    (1962) “Inward” and “outward”: A study in early Quaker language. London: Friends Historical Society.
  12. Crystal, D.
    (forthcoming). Whatever happened to theolinguistics?In P. Chilton , & M. Kopytowska eds Religious language, metaphor and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press. Available atwww.davidcrystal.com/?id=4787&fromsearch=true, accessed26 July 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dandelion, P.
    (2007) An introduction to Quakerism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DesCamp, M. T. & Sweetser, E. E.
    (2005) Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53(3), 207–238. doi: 10.1007/s11089‑004‑0554‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-004-0554-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillman, H.
    (2007) Consider the blackbird: Reflections on spirituality and language. Wallingford, PA: Quaker Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Graves, M. P.
    (2009) Preaching the inward light: Early Quaker rhetoric. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gray, S.
    (c.2010) So, who are these Quakers anyway?Available atwww.aboutquakers.org.uk/, accessed26 July 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Guthrie, S.
    (1980) A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21(2), 181–203. doi: 10.1086/202429
     https://doi.org/10.1086/202429 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hibbert, G. K.
    (1941) Quaker fundamentals. London: Friends Home Service Committee.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hinds, H.
    (2011) George Fox and early Quaker culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. doi: 10.7228/manchester/9780719081576.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719081576.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hodson, J.
    (2009) The Quaker enterprise of metaphor. Quaker Theology, 16. Available atquakertheology.org/issue16-hodson01.htm, accessed26 July 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jäkel, O.
    (2002) Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. metaphorik.de, 02, 20–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kövecses, Z.
    (2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kripal, J. J.
    (2014) Comparing religions. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Leech, D. , & Visala, A.
    (2011) The cognitive science of religion: Implications for theism?Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 46(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9744.2010.01157.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01157.x [Google Scholar]
  26. MacQuarrie, J.
    (1967) God-talk: An examination of the language and logic of theology. London: SCM Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Masson, R.
    (2014) Without metaphor, no saving God: Theology after cognitive linguistics. Leuven: Peeters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McFague, S.
    (1982) Metaphorical theology: Models of God in religious language. London: SCM Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Moore, R. A.
    (2000) The light in their consciences: Early Quakers in Britain 1646–1666. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Musolff, A.
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nørager, T.
    (1999) ‘Heart’ as a metaphor in religious discourse. In L. Boeve , & K. Feyaerts (eds), Metaphor and God-talk (pp.216–232). Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Outreach Committee
    Outreach Committee (2000) Your guide to Quakers. London: Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Penington, I.
    (n.d.). Concerning the sum and substance of our religion, who are called Quakers. InThe works of the long-mournful and sorely-distressed Isaac Penington etc. (pp.441–455). Vol.2. Glenside, PA: Quaker Heritage Press 1995–97 Available atwww.qhpress.org/texts/penington/substance.html, accessed26 July 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  35. Punshon, J.
    (2006) Portrait in grey: A short history of the Quakers. Wallingford, PA: Quaker Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Soriano, C.
    (2015) Emotion and conceptual metaphor. In H. Flam , & J. Kleres (eds), Methods of Exploring Emotions (pp.206–214). Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Soskice, J. M.
    (1985) Metaphor and religious language. Oxford: Clarendon.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Swales, J.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Tremlin, T.
    (2006) Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0195305345.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/0195305345.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. van Noppen, J. P.
    (Ed.) (1983) Metaphor and religion. (Theolinguistics 2). Brussels: VU of Brussels.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
Loading
The light within
Metaphor and the Social World 7, 5 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error