Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article investigates examples of the blocking or development of empathy in videoed discussions between three pairs of conservative Muslim and Christian believers. The analysis focusses on the use of figurative language in the discussions with the aim of identifying examples of metaphor appropriation, and reveals three types of shared metaphor usage. The first is shared language based on the overlapping semantic fields that Christians and Muslims draw on in order to describe their experience. The second consists of appropriation that appears to contribute to the blocking of empathy through the imposition of narratives with specific assumptions. The third involves discourse convergence and empathy development, demonstrating the potential of this type of discourse format to promote bridge building between particular individuals at specific moments in a discourse.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bhaktin, M. M.
    (2006) The problem of speech genres. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader, 2nd Edition (pp.98–107). Abington: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron, L.
    (2011) Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. New York: Taylor Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2010) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.) Metaphor analysis: Research practices in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox. pp.77–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L. , Low, G. D. , & Maslen, R.
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practices in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp.116–146). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clifford, A.
    (2007) The path to paradise Christ or Muhammad?Evangelical Times, January 2007: www.evangelical-times.org/archive/item/2192/Cults-and-other-religions/The-path-to-paradise-Christ-or-Muhammad-/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deignan, A. , Littlemore, J. & Semino, E.
    (2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, N.
    (2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gavins, J.
    (2007) Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, Jr. R. W. , & Colston, H. L.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffman, M. L.
    (2000) Empathy and moral development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851 [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Cameron, L.
    (2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Linell, P.
    (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Macmillan Dictionary
    Macmillan Dictionary (2009–2015) www.macmillandictionary.comMacmillan Publishers Limited (accessedFebruary 2015).
  14. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  15. Naik, Z.
    (2008) Concept of God in major religions. Birmingham: Islamic Dawah Centre International.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Neary, C.
    (2017) “Truth is like a vast tree”: metaphor use in Gandhi’s autobiographical narration. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(1), 106–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Paltridge, B.
    (2006) Discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pihlaja, S.
    (2014) Antagonism on YouTube. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Richardson, P.
    (2015) Violence, belief, and viewpoint: A cognitive poetic analysis of fictional narratives relating to radical Islam. Media and Communication Studies (Hokkaido University), 68, 23–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2013) A closer walk: A cognitive linguistic study of movement and proximity metaphors and their impact on certainty in Muslim and Christian language. University of Birmingham Ethesis. etheses.bham.ac.uk/4691/1/Richardson13PhD.pdf
  22. (2012) A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 233–261. doi: 10.1075/msw.2.2.05ric
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.2.05ric [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, H.
    (2004) An initial characterization of the organization of speaker turn-taking in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp.35–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.04sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.04sac [Google Scholar]
  24. Semino, E. , Deignan, A. , & Littlemore, J.
    (2013) Metaphor, genre and recontexualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2013.742842
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742842 [Google Scholar]
  25. Stockwell, P.
    (2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tausch, N. & Hewstone, M.
    (2013) Intergroup contact. In J. F. Dovidio , M. Hewstone , P. Glick & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Dijk, T. A.
    (2014) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107775404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Christian; Discourse; empathy; metaphor; Muslim
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error