1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article investigates the use of biblical stories and text in the preaching of Joshua Feuerstein, a popular Facebook evangelist, and focuses on how biblical stories are used to position the viewer in comparison to biblical characters and texts. Taking a discourse dynamics approach ( Cameron & Maslen, 2010 ), a corpus of 8 short videos (17 minutes 34 seconds) and their comments (2,295) taken from the Facebook are analysed first, for the presence of metaphorical language and stories taken from the Bible. Second, they are analysed for the role of metaphor in the narrative positioning ( Bamberg, 1997 ) of the viewer, particularly as it relates to Gibbs’s notion of ‘allegorises’, or the ‘allegoric impulse’ ( Gibbs, 2011 ). The corresponding text comments from the videos are then also analysed for the presence of the same biblical metaphor, focusing on how commenters interact with the metaphor and Feuerstein’s positioning of them. Findings show that biblical metaphorical language is used to position viewers and their struggles in the context of larger storylines that compare everyday experiences to biblical texts. This comparison can happen both in explicit narrative positioning of viewers with explicit reference to the Bible, and implicit positioning, through the use of unmarked biblical language. Analysis of viewer comments shows that use of metaphorical language is successful in building a sense of camaraderie and shared belief among the viewer and Feuerstein, as well as viewers with one another.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.06pih
2017-07-06
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allison, D. C., Jr.
    1987 The structure of the Sermon on the Mount. Journal of Biblical Literature, 106, 423–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, M.
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  3. (2004) Considering counter narratives. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp.351–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.4.43bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4.43bam [Google Scholar]
  4. Bass, G. M.
    1982 The evolution of the story sermon. Word and World, 2, 183–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, L.
    (2003) Metaphor in educational research. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2011) Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron, L. , & Low, G.
    (1999) Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, L. , & Maslen, R.
    (Eds.) (2010) Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron, L. , Maslen, R. , Todd, Z. , Maule, J. , Stratton, P. , & Stanley, N.
    (2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. doi: 10.1080/10926480902830821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, G.
    1958Design for Preaching, Minneapolis, MA: Fortress Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, B. , & Harré, R.
    (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Feuerstein, J.
    (2014a) Untitled Facebook Video. Retrieved fromhttps://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=480606392042048
  13. (2014b) Untitled Facebook Video. Retrieved fromhttps://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=449019238534097
  14. Foucault, M.
    (1981) The orders of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibbs, R.
    (2011) The Allegorical Impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121–130. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.556498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.556498 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillespie, M. , Herbert, D. E. J. , & Greenhill, A.
    (2013) Social media and religious change. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110270488
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110270488 [Google Scholar]
  17. Harré, R. , Moghaddam, F. , Cairnie, T. P. , Rothbart, D. , & Sabat, S. R.
    (2009) Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/0959354308101417
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308101417 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harré, R. , & van Langenhove, L.
    (1998) Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutchings, T.
    (2007) Creating church online: A case-study approach to religious experience. Studies in World Christianity, 13(3), 243–260. doi: 10.3366/swc.2007.13.3.243
    https://doi.org/10.3366/swc.2007.13.3.243 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, R. A.
    1980Telling the story: Variety and imagination in preaching, Minneapolis, MA: Augsburg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiesler, S. , Siegel, J. , & McGuire, T. W.
    (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Cameron, L.
    (2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marwick, A. , & boyd, d.
    (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  24. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Noll, M. A. , Bebbington, D. W. , & Rawlyk, G. A.
    (1994) Evangelicalism: Comparative studies of popular protestantism in North America, the British Isles, and beyond, 1700–1990: Oxford Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Packer, J. I.
    (1978) The evangelical anglican identity problem: An analysis. Oxford: Latimer.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pihlaja, S.
    (2013) ‘It’s all red ink’: The interpretation of biblical metaphor among Evangelical Christian YouTube users. Language and Literature, 22(2), 103–117. doi: 10.1177/0963947013483996
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013483996 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2014) Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in online discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Siegel, J. , Dubrovsky, V. , Kiesler, S. , & McGuire, T. W.
    (1986) Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157–187. doi: 10.1016/0749‑5978(86)90050‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Watson, G.
    2014 The sermon in three acts: The rhetoric of cinema and the art of narrative biblical exposition. Revista Batista Pioneira, 3, 193–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zanotto, M. S. , Cameron, L. , & Cavalcanti, M. C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.173
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.06pih
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bible , Evangelical Christian , Facebook , Feuerstein , preaching and social networking sites
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error