References

1. Deignan, A. , Littlemore, J. , & Semino, E.
   (2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Gavins, J. , & Steen, G.
   (Eds.) (2003) Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203417737
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417737 [Google Scholar]
3. Gibbs, R.
   (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gibbs, R.
   (1999) Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gibbs, R.
   (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gibbs, R.
   (2008) Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.3–13), Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Gibbs, R.
   (2011) Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103 [Google Scholar]
8. Gibbs, R.
   (2013) The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 40, 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.001 [Google Scholar]
9. Gibbs, R.
   (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gibbs, R.
    (Ed.) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
11. Gibbs, R. , & Colston, H.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
12. Gibbs, R. , & Colston, H.
    (Eds.) (2007) Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gibbs, R. , & Gerrig, R.
    (Eds.) (1989) Special invited issue: Context and metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3, 123–201.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gibbs, R. , & Steen, G.
    (Eds.) (1999) Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.175
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175 [Google Scholar]
15. Gentner, D. , & Bowdle, B.
    (2008) Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.109–128). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.008 [Google Scholar]
16. Giora, R.
    (2008) Is metaphor unique?In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.143–160). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.010 [Google Scholar]
17. Glucksberg, S.
    (2008) How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.67–83). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006 [Google Scholar]
18. Grady, J.
    (1997)  theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267 [Google Scholar]
19. Hannay, M. , & Steen, G.
    (Eds.) (2007) Structural-functional studies in English grammar: In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.83 [Google Scholar]
20. Harris, R. A.
    (1993) The linguistics wars. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Katz, A. , Cacciari, C. , Gibbs, R. , & Turner, M.
    (1998) Figurative language and thought. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction, (2nd ed.). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ortony, A.
    (Ed.) (1979) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2nd edition 1993].
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
26. Schram, D. , & Steen, G.
    (Eds.) (2001) The psychology and sociology of literature: In honour of Elrud Ibsch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/upal.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35 [Google Scholar]
27. Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D.
    (2008) A deflationary account of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.84–105). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007 [Google Scholar]
28. Steen, G.
    (1994) Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Steen, G.
    (1999) From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp.57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.175.05ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.05ste [Google Scholar]
30. Steen, G.
    (2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
31. Steen, G.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. doi: 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
32. Steen, G.
    (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
33. Steen, G. , & Gibbs, R.
    (2004) Questions about metaphor in literature. European Journal of English Studies, 8, 337–354. doi: 10.1080/1382557042000277421
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277421 [Google Scholar]
34. Steen, G. , Dorst, A. , Herrmann, J. B. , Kaal, A. , Krennmayr, T. , & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
35. Tendahl, M. , & Gibbs, R.
    (2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001 [Google Scholar]
36. VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus
    VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. metaphorlab.org/metcor/search/