1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4070
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4097
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Pihlaja, S. (2014). Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/msw.7.1.10ric-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.10ric
2017-07-06
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cameron, L.
    (2011) Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2010) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.77–96). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, L. , Low, G. , & Maslen, R.
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.116–146). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  5. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/msw.7.1.10ric
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error