1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2950-189X
  • E-ISSN: 2950-1881

Abstract

Abstract

Dutch conditional sentences can occur in canonical clause order, such that the antecedent precedes the consequent, but also in non-canonical order, with the antecedent in sentence-final position. One explanation for the existence of this variety lies in the implicatures they convey: predictive conditionals have what Reuneker (2022) labels a more direct connectedness, possibly resulting in a larger preference for the canonical order than speech act conditionals, which are known for their indirect connectedness. Clause order preference could also be influenced by the desire to optimise discourse coherency (Lee 2001). We put these two factors to the test in an online experiment and found evidence for both theories but not for their interaction. Interestingly, we also found a general preference for the canonical order across all conditions.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00017.van
2025-01-24
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nb.00017.van.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00017.van&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Austin, John Langshaw
    1975How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartoń, Kamil
    2023 MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html. (8 June, 2023).
  3. Box, George E. P. & David R. Cox
    1964 An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)26(2). 211–243. 10.1111/j.2517‑6161.1964.tb00553.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Haviland
    1977 Comprehension and the given-new contract. InRoy O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, 1–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comrie, Bernard
    1986 Conditionals: A typology. InAlice Ter Meulen, Charles A. Ferguson, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Judy Snitzer Reilly (eds.), On Conditionals, 77–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dancygier, Barbara
    1999Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486463 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    1997Then in conditional constructions. Cognitive Linguistics8(2). 109–136. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.2.109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.2.109 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2000 Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order. InElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause — Condition — Concession — Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 111–142. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043 [Google Scholar]
  9. Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
    2001Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  10. DeRose, Keith & Richard E. Grandy
    1999 Conditional assertions and “biscuit” conditionals. Noûs33(3). 405–420. 10.1111/0029‑4624.00161
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00161 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diessel, Holger
    2005 Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics43(3). 449–470. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, Jonathan St. B. T.
    2005 The social and communicative function of conditional statements. Mind & Society4(1). 97–113. 10.1007/s11299‑005‑0003‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-005-0003-x [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. & Stephen E. Newstead
    1977 Language and reasoning: a study of temporal factors. Cognition5(3). 265–283. 10.1016/0010‑0277(77)90005‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90005-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ford, Cecilia E.
    1997 Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for If-clauses in conversation. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On Conditionals Again, 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.143.21for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.21for [Google Scholar]
  15. Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1986 Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. InAlice Ter Meulen, Charles A. Ferguson, Elizabeth C. Traugott & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), On Conditionals, 353–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, John, Sanford Weisberg, Brad Price, Daniel Adler, Douglas Bates, Gabriel Baud-Bovy, Ben Bolker,
    2023 car: Companion to applied regression. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/index.html. (8 June, 2023).
  17. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJoseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language: Report of a Conference Held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13–15, 1961, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haigh, Matthew & Andrew J. Stewart
    2011 The influence of clause order, congruency, and probability on the processing of conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning17(4). 402–423. 10.1080/10463283.2011.628000
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.628000 [Google Scholar]
  19. Haigh, Matthew, Andrew J. Stewart, Jeffrey S. Wood & Louise Connell
    2011 Conditional advice and inducements: Are readers sensitive to implicit speech acts during comprehension?Acta Psychologica136(3). 419–424. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Haviland, Susan E. & Herbert H. Clark
    1974 What’s new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13(5). 512–521. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(74)80003‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
    1988 Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. InJohn Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (Typological Studies in Language), 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.18.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.07kon [Google Scholar]
  22. Lastres-López, Cristina
    2020 Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics1571. 68–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, Chang-Bong
    2001 The information status of English if-clauses in natural discourse. Language Research91. 483–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. López-Rousseau, Alejandro & Timothy Ketelaar
    2006 Juliet: If they do see thee, they will murder thee. A satisficing algorithm for pragmatic conditionals. Mind & Society5(1). 71–77. 10.1007/s11299‑006‑0009‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0009-z [Google Scholar]
  25. Lüdecke, Daniel, Alexander Bartel, Carsten Schwemmer, Chuck Powell, Amir Djalovski & Johannes Titz
    2023 sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sjPlot/index.html. (18 March, 2024).
  26. Nall, Shu Pin & Timothy M. Nall
    2010 English “if-clauses”: A corpus-based genre analysis of their incidence, ordering and pragmatic effects. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(2). 205–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nguyen, Hung & Stefano Galelli
    2020 ldsr: Linear dynamical system reconstruction. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ldsr/index.html. (16 March, 2024).
  28. Qualtrics
    2020 Provo, Utah, VS: Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/
  29. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wenen: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Renmans, Bram & William Van Belle
    2003 The use of the particle dan in Dutch conditional sentences. Leuvense Bijdragen — Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology92(1–2). 141–158. 10.2143/LB.92.1.542037
    https://doi.org/10.2143/LB.92.1.542037 [Google Scholar]
  31. Reuneker, Alex
    2017 Sentence-medial if-clauses in Dutch: Frequency, semantic domain and syntactic integration. Nederlandse Taalkunde22(1). 137–148. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN [Google Scholar]
  32. 2020 Clause order and syntactic integration patterns in Dutch conditionals. Linguistics in the Netherlands37(1). 119–134. 10.1075/avt.00041.reu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00041.reu [Google Scholar]
  33. 2022Connecting conditionals: A corpus-based approach to conditional constructions in Dutch. LOT. 10.48273/LOT0610
    https://doi.org/10.48273/LOT0610 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ripley, Brian, Bill Venables, Douglas M. Bates, Kurt Hornik, Albrecht Gebhardt & David Firth
    2024 MASS: Support functions and datasets for venables and Ripley’s MASS. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/index.html. (16 March, 2024).
  35. Singmann, Henrik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall, Frederik Aust, Mattan S. Ben-Shachar, Søren Højsgaard, John Fox,
    2024 afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/afex/index.html. (16 March, 2024).
  36. Stewart, Andrew J., Matthew Haigh & Evan Kidd
    2009 An investigation into the online processing of counterfactual and indicative conditionals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62(11). 2113–2125. 10.1080/17470210902973106
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902973106 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, Valerie A., Jonathan St. B. T. Evans & Simon J. Handley
    2005 Persuading and dissuading by conditional argument. Journal of Memory and Language53(2). 238–257. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wickham, Hadley & RStudio
    2023 tidyverse: Easily install and load the “Tidyverse.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/index.html. (8 June, 2023).
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00017.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00017.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clause order; conditionals; connectedness; discourse coherency; Dutch
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error