oa Uhm… The use of hesitation markers on the social media platform X in Dutch and Spanish

References

1. Blondet, María Alejandra
   2001 Las pausas llenas: Marcas de duda e identidad lingüística. Lingua Americana81, 5–15. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/lingua/article/view/17077. (6 January, 2024.)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clark, Herbert H., and Jean E. Fox Tree
   2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition84:1, 73–111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
3. D’Arcey, J. Trevor, Shereen Oraby, and Jean E. Fox Tree
   2019 Wait signals predict sarcasm in online debates. Dialogue & Discourse10:2, 56–78. 10.5087/dad.2019.203
   https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2019.203 [Google Scholar]
4. Dingemanse, Mark
   2020 Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction53:1, 188–196. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967 [Google Scholar]
5. Erker, Daniel, and Joanna Bruso
   2017 Uh, bueno, em…: Filled pauses as a site of contact-induced change in Boston Spanish. Language Variation and Change29:2, 205–244. 10.1017/S0954394517000102
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000102 [Google Scholar]
6. Foster, Daniel, Suzanne Aalberse, and Wessel Stoop
   2019 Examining Twitter as a source for address research using Colombian Spanish. InBettina Kluge, María Irene Moyna, Horst J. Simon, and Jonathan Warren (eds.), It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research, 75–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tar.1.03fos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.1.03fos [Google Scholar]
7. Graham, Lamar A.
   2018 Variation in hesitation: The case of este vs. eh in Latin American Spanish. Spanish in Context15:1, 1–26. 10.1075/sic.00001.gra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00001.gra [Google Scholar]
8. Graham, Lamar A.
   2023 A longitudinal corpus-based study of hesitation markers in Mexico City Spanish: Este and eh then and now. Hispanic Studies Review7:1. https://hispanicstudiesreview.cofc.edu/article/57581-a-longitudinal-corpus-based-study-of-hesitation-markers-in-mexico-city-spanish-_este_-and-_eh_-then-and-now. (15 December, 2023.)
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hennoste, Tiit
   2005 Repair-initiating particles and um-s in Estonian spontaneous speech. Proceedings of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop (DiSS’05, 10–12 September 2005, Aix-en-Provence, France), 83–88. https://www.isca-archive.org/diss_2005/hennoste05_diss.pdf. (14 February, 2024.)
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hough, Julian, and Matthew Purver
    2013 Modelling expectation in the self-repair processing of annotat-, um, listeners. SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. University of Amsterdam. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/11462. (14 February, 2024.)
    [Google Scholar]
11. James, Deborah
    1973 Another look at, say, some grammatical constraints, on, oh, interjections and hesitations. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society9:1, 242–251. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cls/pcls/1973/00000009/00000001/art00023#expand/collapse (2 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kosmala, Loulou, and Ludivine Crible
    2022 The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence. Language and Speech65:1, 216–239. 10.1177/00238309211010862
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211010862 [Google Scholar]
13. Levelt, Willem J. M.
    1989 Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Maclay, Howard, and Charles E. Osgood
    1959 Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word151, 19–44. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682 [Google Scholar]
15. Rehbein, Ines
    2015 Filled pauses in user-generated content are words with extra-propositional meaning. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Semantics (ExProM 2015), 12–21. 10.3115/v1/W15‑1302
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-1302 [Google Scholar]
16. Rendle-Short, Johanna
    2015 Dispreferred responses when texting: Delaying that “no” response. Discourse & Communication9:6, 643–661. 10.1177/1750481315600309
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315600309 [Google Scholar]
17. Roesslein, J.
    2020 Tweepy: Twitter for Python!https://Github.Com/Tweepy/Tweepy. (15 October, 2023.)
18. Tottie, Gunnel
    2014 On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language21:1, 6–29. 10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot [Google Scholar]
19. Townsend, Leanne, and Claire Wallace
    2016 Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen. https://www.bolton.ac.uk/assets/Uploads/Social-media-ethics-study-Aberdeen-2018.pdf. (25 June, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
20. van Halteren, Hans, and Nelleke Oostdijk
    2012 Towards identifying normal forms for various word form spellings on Twitter. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal21, 2–22. https://clinjournal.org/clinj/article/view/12. (25 June, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wang, Yan
    2011 A discourse-pragmatic functional study of the discourse markers Japanese ano and Chinese nage. Intercultural Communication Studies20:2. https://www-s3-live.kent.edu/s3fs-root/s3fs-public/file/05YanWang.pdf. (25 June, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
22. Wieling, Martijn, Jack Grieve, Gosse Bouma, Josef Fruehwald, John Coleman, and Mark Liberman
    2016 Variation and change in the use of hesitation markers in Germanic languages. Language Dynamics and Change6:2, 199–234. 10.1163/22105832‑00602001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00602001 [Google Scholar]
23. X
    X 2023 https://twitter.com. (21 November, 2023.)
24. Zimmermann, Malte
    2011 Discourse particles. InSemantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning21, 2011–2038.
    [Google Scholar]