1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Nota Bene
  4. Volume 2, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2950-189X
  • E-ISSN: 2950-1881
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

A common type of split ergativity is conditioned by tense and/or aspect in that an ergative-absolutive system occurs in the past tense or perfective aspect and a nominative-accusative system occurs in the non-past tense(s) or imperfective aspect (DeLancey 1982, Payne 2006). This finding, however, pertains to case marking only. Using a genetically diverse typological sample on conditional argument indexing in 83 languages (Walker 2024, Walker & Van Lier under review), the present study explores if a similar tendency can be found for indexing. Within the database, 22 languages display indexing conditioned by TAM (tense, aspect, mood) factors. Across 17 languages, a clear trend regarding aspect and indexing was found: imperfective, progressive, and non-completive aspect condition a nominative-accusative system while perfective, terminative, and completive aspect condition an ergative-absolutive system. For tense and mood, however, no such clear relationship was found. For the remaining 5 languages, the TAM split applied to a specific person/number value only. We conclude that for aspect, but not for tense and mood, our findings correspond with previous literature on split-ergativity in case marking.

© 2025 The Author(s)
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
2025-10-31
2025-11-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nb.00034.wit.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adell, Eric James
    2019 The Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology of Chajul Ixil (Mayan). Austin: University of Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Álvarez, Juan Jesús Vázquez
    2011 A Grammar of Chol, a Mayan language. University of Texas at Austin PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel, Balthasar
    2010 Grammatical relations typology. InJae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0020
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0020 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickel, Balthasar, Johanna Nichols, Taras Zakharko, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kristine Hildebrandt, Michael Rießler, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & John B Lowe
    2022 The AUTOTYP database (v1.1.0). 10.5281/zenodo.6793367.
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6793367 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd, Virginia Lee
    1997 A phonology and grammar of Mbodomo. The University of Texas at Arlington MA Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Coler, Matt
    2014 A grammar of Muylaq Aymara. Aymara as spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden: Bril.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Curnow, Timothy
    1997 A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of south-western Colombia. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. DeLancey, Scott
    1982 Aspect, transitivity and viewpoint. InPaul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-Aspect (Vol.11), 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.1.12del
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.12del [Google Scholar]
  9. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dutton, Tom
    2003 A Dictionary of Koiari, Papua New Guinea: with grammar notes. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett, Gary Holton, Marian Klamer, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
    2013 Conditions on pronominal marking in the Alor-Pantar languages. Linguistics51(1). 33–74. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0002.
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
    2014 Variation in pronominal indexing: Lexical stipulation vs. referential properties in Alor-Pantar languages. Studies in Language38(1). 44–79. 10.1075/sl.38.1.02fed.
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.1.02fed [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn, Michael J.
    1999 A Grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Huddleston, Rodney D. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Haspelmath, Martin
    2019 Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo, 62(1). 93–115. 10.17617/2.3168042
     https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3168042 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hofling, Charles A.
    2000 Itzaj Maya Grammar. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Grimm, Nadine
    2021 A grammar of Gyeli (Comprehensive Grammar Library 2). Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ingram, Andrew
    2001 Anamuxra: A language of Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. University of Sydney PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Komen, Erwin R., Zarina Molochieva & Johanna Nichols
    2021 Chechen and Ingush. InMaria Polinsky (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Languages of the Caucasus, 317–365. 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190690694.013.10.
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190690694.013.10 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liljegren, Henrik
    2016 A grammar of Palula. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_611690
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_611690 [Google Scholar]
  21. Loughnane, Robyn
    2009 A grammar of Oksapmin. University of Melbourne PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mihas, Elena
    2015 A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak) (Mouton Grammar Library). Vol.691. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Molochieva, Zarina, Pegah Faghiri & Eva van Lier
    2022 Bi-absolutive constructions in Chechen. Folia Linguistica56(2). 325–349. doi:10.1515/flin2022‑2036.
     https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/flin2022-2036 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya
    2001 A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110849035.
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849035 [Google Scholar]
  25. Payne, Thomas
    2006 Grammatical relations. InThomas Payne (ed.), Exploring language structure, 210–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511806483.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806483.010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarvasy, Hannah
    2017 A Grammar of Nungon: A Papuan Language of Northeast New Guinea. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Schrock, Terrill
    2014 A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód): Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language (LOT 374). Amsterdam: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Schapper, Antoinette
    2014 Kamang. InAntoinette Schapper (ed.), The Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Volume 1: Sketch Grammars (Pacific Linguistics 644), 285–350. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Seržant, Ilja. A. & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    2018 Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. InIlja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.1219168
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1219168 [Google Scholar]
  30. Shimelman, Aviva
    2017 A grammar of Yauyos Quechua (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 9). Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Siewierska, Anna
    2013 Alignment of verbal person marking. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.13950591 (Available online atwals.info/chapter/100, Accessed on2025-03-03)
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591
  32. Stenzel, Kristine
    2013 A Reference Grammar of Kotiria (Wanano). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2015 More on switch-reference in Kotiria (Wanano, East Tukano). InRik van Gijn & Jeremy Hammond (eds.), Switch Reference 2.0 (Typological Studies in Langauge 114), 425–452. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.114.12ste.
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.114.12ste [Google Scholar]
  34. Walker, Katherine
    2024 Conditional indexing. Amsterdam: LOT dissertations series. https://lotschool.nl/lot-678-conditional-indexing/
  35. Walker, Katherine & Eva van Lier
    . Under review. A cross-linguistic study of conditional argument indexing.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zariquiey, Roberto
    2018 A grammar of Kakataibo. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110765816
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110765816 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
Loading
TAM splits in conditional argument indexing
Nota Bene 2, 289 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00034.wit
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): alignment; argument indexing; aspect; split ergativity; TAMEP; tense; typology

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error