The prosodic structure of Turkish accent patterns

References

1. Barker, Chris
   1989 Extrametricality and the cycle: Word stress in Turkish. InJunko Ito & Jeffrey Runner (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz11, 1–33.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Booij, Geert
   2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fukumori, Takahiro
   2010 Torukogo no akusento ni tsuite (‘On the accent in Turkish’). Gengo Kenkyu1371, 41–63.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake
   2005 Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Göksel, Aslı
   2010 Focus in words with truth values. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics2(1), 89–112.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Güneș, Güliz
   2015 Deriving prosodic structures. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
7. Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
   1987 An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hameed, Jumah K.
   1985 Lexical phonology and morphology of modern standard Turkish. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa141, 71–95.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hayes, Bruce
   1995 Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Inkelas, Sharon
    1999 Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: representations versus the grammar. InRené Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface, 134–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627729.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627729.006 [Google Scholar]
11. Inkelas, Sharon & Cemil Orhan Orgun
    1998 Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. InSteven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & Patrick Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 360–392. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Inkelas, Sharon & Orhan Orgun
    2003 Turkish stress: a review. Phonology201. 139–161. 10.1017/S0952675703004482
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675703004482 [Google Scholar]
13. Johanson, Lars
    1998 The structure of Turkic. InLars Johanson & Éva Á. Csató (eds.), The Turkic languages, 30–66. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Johanson, Lars
    2021 Turkic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139016704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016704 [Google Scholar]
15. Kabak, Barış & Irene Vogel
    2001 The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology181. 315–360. 10.1017/S0952675701004201
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004201 [Google Scholar]
16. Kabak, Barış & Irene Vogel
    2011 Exceptions to stress and harmony: cophonologies or prespecification?InH. Simon & H. Weise (eds.), Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, 59–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219098.59
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219098.59 [Google Scholar]
17. Kabak, Barış & Janne Lorenzen
    2020 Paradigm leveling and regularization derive variation in stress: A corpus study on Turkish non-final stress at the morphology-phonology interface. InAslı Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen & Balkız Öztürk (eds.), Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries: In honour of Aslı Göksel, 193–210. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.215.07kab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.215.07kab [Google Scholar]
18. Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan & Jaklin Kornfilt
    2011 The syntax and prosody of Turkish ‘pre-stressing’ suffixes. InR. Folli & C. Ulbrick (eds.), Interfaces in linguistics: New research perspectives, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kaisse, Ellen M.
    1985 Some theoretical consequences of stress rules in Turkish. CLS211, 199–209. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kaisse, Ellen M.
    1986 Toward a lexical phonology of Turkish. Brame, Michael, Heles Conteras & Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds.), A Festschrift for Sol Saporta, 231–239. Seattle, WA: Noit Amrofer.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kamali, Beste
    2011 Topics at the PF interface of Turkish. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
22. Kardestuncer, Aino
    1983 Vowel harmony and gerundive compounds in Turkish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensa18(1), 55–64. 10.1080/03740463.1983.10416050
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1983.10416050 [Google Scholar]
23. Konrot, Ahmet K.
    1981 Towards understanding Turkish stress: An acoustic and perceptual study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
24. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    1997 Turkish. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Laks, Bernard
    1997 Phonologie accentuelle: Métrique, autosegmentalité et constituance. Paris: CNRS Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lees, Robert B.
    1961 The phonology of modern standard Turkish. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Levi, Susannah V.
    2005 Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association35(1), 73–97. 10.1017/S0025100305001921
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100305001921 [Google Scholar]
28. Lewis, Geoffrey
    2000 Turkish grammar. 2nd edition. Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton. First edition published in 1967. 10.1093/oso/9780198700364.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198700364.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Lightner, Theodore M.
    1978 The main stress rule in Turkish. InMohammad A. Jazayery (eds.), Linguistic and literary studies. Volume 2: Descriptive Linguistics, 267–270. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110800432.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800432.267 [Google Scholar]
30. Nauta, A. H.
    1973 Turks voor Nederlanders. Deventer: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Newell, Heather
    2005 The phonological phase. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics191. 21–64.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Özçelik, Öner
    2014 Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: the case of Turkish stress. Phonology31(2), 229–269. 10.1017/S0952675714000128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675714000128 [Google Scholar]
33. Özçelik, Öner
    2024 The phonology of Turkish. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192869722.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192869722.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Poser, William J.
    1984 The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
35. Prince, Alan S.
    1983 Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry14(1), 19–100.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Revithiadou, Anthi, Hasan Kaili, Sophia Prokou & Maria-Anna Tiliopoulou
    2006 Turkish accentuation revisited: a compositional approach to Turkish stress. InSemiramis Yağcıoğlu (eds.) Advances in Turkish linguistics, 37–50. Izmir: Dokuz Eylül Yayinla.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sebüktekin, Hikmet
    1986 Turkish word stress: some observations. InEser Erguvanli Taylan (ed.), Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference: August 9–10, 1984, 295–307. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sezer, Engin
    1981 On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies51. 61–69.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sezer, Engin
    2001 Finite inflection. InEser Erguvanlı Taylan (eds.), The verb in Turkish, 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.44.02sez
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.44.02sez [Google Scholar]
40. Swift, Lloyd B.
    1962 Some aspects of stress and pitch in Turkish syntactic patterns. InNicholas Poppe (ed.), American Studies in Altaic Linguistics, 331–341. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Swift, Lloyd B.
    1963 A reference grammar of modern Turkish. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Underhill, Robert
    1988 A lexical account of Turkish accent. InSabri Koç (ed.), Studies on Turkish Linguistics, 387–406. Ankara: METU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Van der Hulst, Harry & Jeroen van de Weijer
    1991 Topics in Turkish phonology. InHendrik E. Boeschoten & Ludo T. Verhoeven, Turkish Linguistics Today, 11–59. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004653474_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653474_004 [Google Scholar]
44. Zimmer, Karl E.
    1970 Some observations on non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of the American Oriental Society90(1). 160–162. 10.2307/598438
    https://doi.org/10.2307/598438 [Google Scholar]