1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2950-189X
  • E-ISSN: 2950-1881

Abstract

Abstract

Coaching is a fast-growing learning and development format. While its overall effectiveness is empirically established in psychological research, there is little linguistic research on how particular discursive practices are used in coaching interactions to co-construct such effectiveness. This paper focusses on modal particles and investigates their use in workplace coaching in German. Drawing on four coaching processes from the QueSCo corpus, it specifically analyses coaches’ particle use across various sentence types. Results show that coaches construct themselves as neutral process managers by using particular modal particles: in questions, they mainly use the most neutral particles and , in orders, they mainly use softening particles such as , and in declaratives, particles such as that mark common ground dominate.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00039.sch
2025-10-31
2025-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nb.00039.sch.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00039.sch&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Autenrieth, Tanja
    2002Heterosemie und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110960907
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110960907 [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchholz, Michael
    2013 Die Herausbildung psychotherapeutischer Kompetenz. InStefan Busse & Bettina Hausinger (eds.), Supervisions- und Coachingprozesse erforschen, 77–108. Göttingen: Hogrefe. 10.13109/9783666403576.77
    https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666403576.77 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brünjes, Lena
    2014Das Paradigma deutscher Modalpartikeln. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110375350
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375350 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox, Elaine, Tatiana Bachkirova & David Clutterbuck
    (eds.) 2023The Complete Handbook of Coaching (4th ed.). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2009 Verstehensdefizit als Antwortverpflichtung. InSusanne Günthner & Jörg Bücker (eds), Grammatik im Gespräch, 23–56. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213638.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213638.21 [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew, Paul & John Heritage
    (eds) 1992Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliot, Robert
    2010 Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research20(2). 123–135. 10.1080/10503300903470743
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903470743 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fillery-Travis, Annette & Elaine Cox
    2018 Researching coaching. InElaine Cox, Tatiana Bachkirova & David Clutterbuck (eds.), The Complete Handbook of Coaching (3rd ed.), 518–536). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischer, Madeleine
    2017 Modalpartikeln in Therapiegesprächen. Unpublished MA thesis, Universität Mannheim
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
    2024a New Ways of Investigating Coaching: Linguistic Research on Executive, Business and Workplace Coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice17(1). 90–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2024b A Closer Look into the “Black Box” of Coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 17(1). 119–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graf, Eva-Maria
    2019The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.303
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.303 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2022 Helfen im Führungskräfte-Coaching als kommunikativer Aushandlungsprozess in verschiedenen Spannungsfeldern. InDaniela Böhringer, Sarah Hitzler & Martina Richter (eds.), Helfen: Situative und organisationale Ausprägungen einer unbestimmten Praxis, 133–162. Bielefeld: Transkript. 10.14361/9783839454992‑007
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839454992-007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Graf, Eva-Maria & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
    2018 Helfende Berufe — Helfende Interaktionen. InKarin Birkner & Nina Janich (eds.). Handbuch Text und Gespräch, 418–442. Amsterdam: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110296051‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296051-017 [Google Scholar]
  15. Graf, Eva-Maria & Frédérick Dionne
    2021a Coaching Research in 2020 — About Destinations, Journeys and Travelers (Part I). International Coaching Psychology Review16(1). 36–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2021b Coaching Research in 2020 — About Destinations, Journeys and Travelers (Part II). International Coaching Psychology Review16(2). 6–21. 10.53841/bpsicpr.2021.16.2.6
    https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2021.16.2.6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Graf, Eva-Maria, Melanie Fleischhacker & Frédérick Dionne
    . (under review). Questioning Sequences in Coaching (QueSCo): Results from an interdisciplinary research project. Coaching. An International Journal of Theory, Research & Practice.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Graf, Eva-Maria, Claudio Scarvaglieri & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
    (eds.) 2019Pragmatik der Veränderung. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grant, Anthony & Steve O’Connor
    2019 A brief primer for those new to coaching research and evidence-based practice. The Coaching Psychologist15(1). 3–10. 10.53841/bpstcp.2019.15.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2019.15.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gülich, Elisabeth
    2003 Conversational Techniques Used in Transferring Knowledge between Medical Experts and Non-experts. Discourse Studies5(2). 235–263. 10.1177/1461445603005002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hentschel, Elke
    1986Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111371221
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111371221 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, John
    2012 Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1). 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jautz, Sabine
    2017 Immer auf Augenhöhe? Ein Blick in den sprachlichen Werkzeugkoffer im Coaching. InMarcel Dräger & Martha Kuhnhenn (eds.). Sprache in Rede, Gespräch und Kommunikation, 47–64. Berlin: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller, Sonja
    2014Modalpartikeln. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Oben, Bert & Geert Brône
    2016 Explaining interactive alignment: A multimodal and multifactorial account. Journal of Pragmatics1041. 32–51. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schermuly, Carsten C.
    2019Erfolgreiches Business-Coaching. Weinheim: Beltz.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schmidt, Thomas & Wilfried Schütte
  28. Schöffler, Marta & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
    2012ja m_hm Patientenreaktionen auf prädiagnostische Mitteilungen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik571. 1–32. 10.1515/zfal‑2012‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2012-0009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schoonjans, Steven
    2022Schwierige Wörtchen leicht übersetzt!Wien: Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2025 Modal particles in German. InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics 2nd edition, 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1479.pub2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1479.pub2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sidnell, Jack
    2010Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Thurmair, Maria
    1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111354569
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111354569 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1993 Äußerungsform oder Äußerungsfunktion? Zu den Bedingungen für das Auftreten von Modalpartikeln. Deutsche Sprache21(1). 22–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Viesel, Yvonne & Constantin Freitag
    2019 Wer kann denn schon ja sagen? Natural and experimental data on German discourse particles in rhetorical questions. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft38(2). 243–298. 10.1515/zfs‑2019‑2003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-2003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Waltereit, Richard
    2006Abtönung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110948295
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110948295 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00039.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/nb.00039.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): coaches’ use; German; modal particles; workplace coaching
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error